Fig. 1 Schematic of cable-harnessed plate structure with ( a ) zigzag and ( b ) diagonal wrapping patterns. The solid lines represent the segments of the cables on the top surface of the plate while the dashed lines represent the parts on the bottom surface. The wrapping is in the ... More about this image found in Schematic of cable-harnessed plate structure with ( a ) zigzag and ...

Fig. 2 Experimental setup More about this image found in Experimental setup

Fig. 3 Pictures of the tested cable-harnessed plate structures: ( a ) structure 1, ( b ) structure 2, ( c ) structure 3, and ( d ) structure 4 More about this image found in Pictures of the tested cable-harnessed plate structures: ( a ) stru...

Fig. 4 Frequency response functions associated with structure 1: ( a ) bare plate and cabled plate test, ( b ) bare plate and cabled plate model, ( c ) bare plate test and model, and ( d ) cabled plate test and model More about this image found in Frequency response functions associated with structure 1: ( a ) bar...

Fig. 5 Frequency response functions associated with structure 2: ( a ) bare plate and cabled plate test, ( b ) bare plate and cabled plate model, ( c ) bare plate test and model, and ( d ) cabled plate test and model More about this image found in Frequency response functions associated with structure 2: ( a ) bar...

Fig. 6 Frequency response functions associated with structure 3: ( a ) bare plate and cabled plate test, ( b ) bare plate and cabled plate model, ( c ) bare plate test and model, and ( d ) cabled plate test and model More about this image found in Frequency response functions associated with structure 3: ( a ) bar...

Fig. 7 Frequency response functions associated with structure 4: ( a ) bare plate and cabled plate test, ( b ) bare plate and cabled plate model, ( c ) bare plate test and model, and ( d ) cabled plate test and model More about this image found in Frequency response functions associated with structure 4: ( a ) bar...

Fig. 1 ( a ) Schematic of beam with a mode 1 crack, ( b ) equivalent model with a flexural spring modeling the crack, and ( c ) beam configurations A ( w , Y Y ( l , t ) > 0 ) and B ( w , Y Y ( l , t ) < 0 ) More about this image found in ( a ) Schematic of beam with a mode 1 crack, ( b ) equivalent model with a ...

Fig. 2 ω n ( i ) ( α , e ) for ( a ) first, ( b ) second, ( c ) third, and ( d ) fourth mode for δ → 0 and α A , B = α More about this image found in ω n ( i ) ( α , e ) for ( a ) first, ( b ) second, ( c ) t...

Fig. 3 ω n ( i ) ( α , e ) for ( a ) first, ( b ) second, ( c ) third, and ( d ) fourth mode for δ = 0.1 and α A , B = α More about this image found in ω n ( i ) ( α , e ) for ( a ) first, ( b ) second, ( c ) t...

Fig. 4 Algorithm to find the response of cracked beam modeled by incorporating PWL spring More about this image found in Algorithm to find the response of cracked beam modeled by incorporating PWL...

Fig. 5 ( a ) Response of the free end of a cracked beam (case 4: α A = 0 , α B = 0.125 , e = 0.5 , δ = 0.1 ) for initial condition corresponding to the first mode of beam (case 1) in configuration A and ( b ) FFT of response shown in ( a ) More about this image found in ( a ) Response of the free end of a cracked beam (case 4: α A = 0 ...

Fig. 6 ( a ) Response of the free end of a cracked beam (case 4: α A = 0 , α B = 0.125 , e = 0.5 , δ = 0.1 ) for initial condition corresponding to the second mode of beam (case 1) in configuration A and ( b ) FFT of response shown in ( a ) More about this image found in ( a ) Response of the free end of a cracked beam (case 4: α A = 0 ...

Fig. 7 ( a ) Response of the free end of a cracked beam (case 4: α A = 0 , α B = 0.125 , e = 0.5 , δ → 0 ) for the initial condition corresponding to the third mode of beam (case 1) in configuration A and ( b ) FFT of response shown in ( a ) More about this image found in ( a ) Response of the free end of a cracked beam (case 4: α A = 0 ...