Various types of tuned-mass dampers (TMDs), or dynamic vibration absorbers, have been proposed in literature, including the classic TMD, (parallel) multiple TMDs, multidegree-of-freedom (DOF) TMD, and three-element TMD. In this paper we study the characteristics and optimization of a new type of TMD system, in which multiple absorbers are connected to the primary system in series. Decentralized H2 and H control methods are adopted to optimize the parameters of spring stiffness and damping coefficients for random and harmonic vibration. It is found that series multiple TMDs are more effective and robust than all the other types of TMDs of the same mass ratio. The series two TMDs of total mass ratio of 5% can appear to have 31–66% more mass than the classical TMD, and it can perform better than the optimal parallel ten TMDs of the same total mass ratio. The series TMDs are also less sensitive to the parameter variance of the primary system than other TMD(s). Unlike in the parallel multiple TMDs where at the optimum the absorber mass is almost equally distributed, in the optimal series TMDs the mass of the first absorber is generally much larger than the second one. Similar to the 2DOF TMD, the optimal series two TMDs also have zero damping in one of its two connections, and further increased effectiveness can be obtained if a negative dashpot is allowed. The optimal performance and parameters of series two TMDs are obtained and presented in a form of ready-to-use design charts.

1.
Frahm
,
H.
, 1911, “
Device for Damping Vibrations of Bodies
,” U.S. Patent No. 989,958.
2.
Den Hartog
,
J. P.
, 1947,
Mechanical Vibration
,
McGraw-Hill
,
New York
.
3.
Warburton
,
G.
, 1982, “
Optimum Absorber Parameters for Various Combinations of Response and Excitation Parameters
,”
Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn.
0098-8847,
10
, pp.
381
401
.
4.
Asani
,
T.
,
Nishihara
,
O.
, and
Baz
,
A. M.
, 2002, “
Analytical Solutions to H∞ and H2 Optimization of Dynamic Vibration Absorber Attached to Damped Linear Systems
,”
ASME J. Vibr. Acoust.
0739-3717,
124
, pp.
67
78
.
5.
Zuo
,
L.
, and
Nayfeh
,
S.
, 2002, “
Design of Multi-Degree-of-Freedom Tuned-Mass Dampers: A Minimax Approach
,”
43rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference
, AIAA Paper No. 2002-1283.
6.
Zuo
,
L.
, and
Nayfeh
,
S.
, 2004, “
Minimax Optimization of Multi-Degree-of-Freedom Tuned-Mass Dampers
,”
J. Sound Vib.
0022-460X,
272
, pp.
893
908
.
7.
Zuo
,
L.
, and
Nayfeh
,
S.
, 2003, “
The Multi-dof Tuned-Mass Damper for Suppression of Single-Mode Vibration Under Random and Harmonic Excitation
,”
Proceedings of the 2003 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference
.
8.
Zuo
,
L.
, and
Nayfeh
,
S.
, 2006, “
The Two-Degree-of-Freedom Tuned-Mass Damper for Suppression of Single-Mode Vibration Under Random and Harmonic Excitation
,”
ASME J. Vibr. Acoust.
0739-3717,
128
, pp.
56
65
.
9.
Xu
,
K.
, and
Igusa
,
T.
, 1992, “
Dynamic Characteristics of Multiple Substructures With Closely Spaced Frequencies
,”
Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn.
0098-8847,
21
, pp.
1059
1070
.
10.
Yamaguchi
,
H.
, and
Hampornchai
,
N.
, 1993, “
Fundamental Characteristics of Multiple Tuned Mass Dampers for Suppressing Harmonically Forced Oscillations
,”
Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn.
0098-8847,
22
, pp.
51
62
.
11.
Abe
,
M.
, and
Fujino
,
Y.
, 1994, “
Dynamic Characterization of Multiple Tuned Mass Dampers and Some Design Formulas
,”
Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn.
0098-8847,
23
, pp.
813
835
.
12.
Joshi
,
A.
, and
Jangid
,
R.
, 1997, “
Optimum Parameters of Multiple Tuned Mass Dampers for Based-Excited Damped Systems
,”
J. Sound Vib.
0022-460X,
202
, pp.
657
667
.
13.
Li
,
C.
, 2002, “
Optimum Multiple Tuned Mass Dampers for Structures Under the Ground Acceleration Based on DDMF and ADMF
,”
Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn.
0098-8847,
31
, pp.
897
919
.
14.
Zuo
,
L.
, and
Nayfeh
,
S.
, 2003, “
Optimization of the Individual Stiffness and Damping Parameters in Multiple Tuned Mass Dampers
,”
Smart Structures and Materials 2003: Damping and Isolation, Proceedings of SPIE
,
K.-W.
Wang
, ed.
15.
Zuo
,
L.
, and
Nayfeh
,
S.
, 2005, “
Optimization of the Individual Stiffness and Damping Parameters in Multiple-Tuned-Mass-Damper Systems
,”
ASME J. Vibr. Acoust.
0739-3717,
127
(
1
), pp.
77
83
.
16.
Li
,
H.-N.
, and
Ni
,
X.-L.
, 2007, “
Optimization of Non-Uniformly Distributed Multiple Tuned Mass Damper
,”
J. Sound Vib.
0022-460X,
308
, pp.
89
97
.
17.
Zuo
,
L.
, and
Nayfeh
,
S.
, 2002, “
Design of Passive Mechanical Systems Via Decentralized Control Techniques
,”
43rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference
, AIAA Paper No. 2002-1282.
18.
Zhou
,
K.
,
Doyle
,
J. C.
, and
Glover
,
K.
, 1995,
Robust and Optimal Control
,
Prentice-Hall
,
Englewood Cliffs, NJ
.
19.
Graham
,
A.
, 1981,
Kronecker Products and Matrix Calculus: With Applications
,
Wiley
,
New York
.
20.
Bertsekas
,
D. P.
, 1995,
Nonlinear Programming
,
Athena Scientific
,
Belmont, MA
.
21.
Snowdon
,
J.
, 1974, “
Dynamic Vibration Absorbers That Have Increased Effectiveness
,”
ASME J. Eng. Ind.
0022-0817,
96
, pp.
940
945
.
22.
Asami
,
T.
, and
Nishihara
,
O.
, 2002, “
H2 Optimization of the Three-Element Type Dynamic Vibration Absorbers
,”
ASME J. Vibr. Acoust.
0739-3717,
112
(
4
), pp.
583
592
.
23.
Strasberg
,
M.
, and
Feit
,
D.
, 1996, “
Vibration Damping of Large Structures Induced by Attached Small Resonant Structures
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
0001-4966,
99
, pp.
335
344
.
24.
Akay
,
A.
,
Xu
,
Z.
,
Carcaterra
,
A.
, and
Koc
,
I.
, 2005, “
Experiments on Vibration Absorption Using Energy Sinks
,”
ASME J. Vibr. Acoust.
0739-3717,
118
(
5
), pp.
3043
3049
.
You do not currently have access to this content.