The flow through a high-bypass ratio fan stage during engine-out conditions is investigated, with the objective of quantifying the internal losses when the rotor is at “windmill.” An analysis of altitude test data at various simulated flight Mach numbers shows that the fan rotational speed scales with the engine mass flow rate. Making use of the known values of the nozzle coefficients, we deduce the stagnation pressure loss of the fan stage, which rises significantly as the mass flow rate increases. In order to better understand this behavior, numerical simulations of the fan stage were carried out. The calculated losses agree well with the test data, and it is found that the bulk of the stagnation pressure loss occurs in the stator. A detailed examination of the flow field reveals that the relative flow leaves the rotor at very nearly the metal angle. Moreover, the rotational speed of the fan is such that the inboard sections of the fan blade add work to the flow, while the outboard sections extract work from it. The overall work is essentially zero so that the absolute swirl angle at the rotor exit is small, causing the stator to operate at a severely negative incidence. A gross separation ensues, and the resulting blockage of the stator passage accelerates the flow to high Mach numbers. The highly separated flow in the vane, together with the mixing of the large wakes behind it are responsible for the high losses in the vane. Based on the simulation results for the flow behavior, a simple physical model to estimate the windmill speed of the rotor is developed and is found to be in good agreement with the test data. The utility of this model is that it enables the development of a procedure to predict the internal drag at engine-out conditions, which is discussed.

1.
Daggett
,
D. L.
,
Brown
,
S. T.
, and
Kawai
,
R. T.
, 2003, “
Ultra-Efficient Engine Diameter Study
,”
NASA
Report No. CR 2003-212309.
2.
Walsh
,
P. P.
, and
Fletecher
,
P.
, 2004,
Gas Turbine Performance
,
Blackwell Science
,
Oxford, UK
.
3.
Anderson
,
B. A.
,
Messih
,
D.
, and
Plybon
,
R. C.
, 1997, “
Engine-Out Performance Characteristics
,” ISABE Paper No. 97–7216.
4.
Braig
,
W.
,
Schulte
,
H.
, and
Riegler
,
C.
, 1999, “
Comparative Analysis of the Windmilling Performance of Turbojet and Turbofan Engines
,”
J. Propul. Pow.
,
15
, pp.
326
333
.
5.
Davis
,
R. L.
,
Ni
,
R. -H.
, and
Carter
,
J. E.
, 1986, “
Cascade Viscous Flow Analysis Using the Navier–Stokes Equations
,” AIAA Paper No. 86–0033.
6.
Ni
,
R. -H.
, 1982, “
A Multiple-Grid Scheme for Solving the Euler Equations
,”
AIAA J.
0001-1452,
20
, pp.
1565
1571
.
7.
Wilcox
,
D. C.
, 1998,
Turbulence Modeling for CFD
,
DCW Industries, Inc.
,
La Canada, CA
.
8.
Giles
,
M. B.
, 1990, “
Non-Reflecting Boundary Conditions for Euler Equation Calculations
,”
AIAA J.
0001-1452,
28
, pp.
2050
2058
.
9.
Ni
,
R. -H.
and
Bogoian
,
H.
, 1989, “
Predictions of 3-D Multi-Stage Turbine Flow Fields Using a Multiple-Grid Euler Solver
,” AIAA Paper No. 89-0233.
10.
Ni
,
R. -H.
and
Sharma
,
O. P.
, 1990, “
Using a 3-D Euler Flow Simulation to Assess Effects of Periodic Unsteady Flow Through Turbines
,” AIAA Paper No. 90-2357.
11.
Prasad
,
D.
, and
Feng
,
J.
, 2005, “
Propagation and Decay of Shock Waves in Turbofan Engine Inlets
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
127
, pp.
118
127
.
12.
Pianko
,
M.
and
Wazelt
,
F.
, 1983, “
Suitable Averaging Techniues in Non-Uniform Internal Flows
,” Propulsion and Energetics Panel Working Group 14, Paper No. AGARD AR 182.
13.
Prasad
,
A.
, 2005, “
Calculation of the Mixed-Out State in Turbomachine Flows
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
127
, pp.
564
572
.
14.
Greitzer
,
E. M.
,
Tan
,
C. S.
, and
Graf
,
M. B.
, 2004,
Internal Flow: Concepts and Applications
,
Cambridge University Press
,
Cambridge, UK
.
15.
Cumpsty
,
N. A.
, 1989,
Compressor Aerodynamics
,
Longman
,
Harlow, UK
.
You do not currently have access to this content.