Abstract

The random process model, also known as the multi-asperity contact model or statistical model, is one of the dominant methodologies for analyzing the contact between nominally flat rough surfaces. In 1975, Bush, Gibson, and Thomas developed a complete random process model (known as the BGT model) assuming that solid–solid contacts occur on the summits of the asperities, which are semi-ellipsoids uniquely described by three random variables (the asperity height and two principal peak curvatures). The Hertzian elliptic contact theory states that the contact area and normal load are implicit functions of the random variables, which results in an original BGT model with a complex formulation. In this study, we used an adapted Hertzian elliptic contact theory to simplify the formulation of the BGT model. The relative contact area to normal load relation predicted by the simplified BGT model perfectly agrees with that of the original formulation. It is anticipated that rough surface contact models with complex asperity interactions can be effectively built under the framework of this simplified BGT model.

Graphical Abstract Figure
Graphical Abstract Figure
Close modal

References

1.
Barber
,
J.
,
2003
, “
Bounds on the Electrical Resistance Between Contacting Elastic Rough Bodies
,”
Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A: Math. Phys. Eng. Sci.
,
459
(
2029
), pp.
53
66
.
2.
Persson
,
B. N.
,
2001
, “
Theory of Rubber Friction and Contact Mechanics
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
,
115
(
8
), pp.
3840
3861
.
3.
Greenwood
,
J. A.
, and
Williamson
,
J. P.
,
1966
, “
Contact of Nominally Flat Surfaces
,”
Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A.
,
295
(
1442
), pp.
300
319
.
4.
Wang
,
G.
,
Liang
,
X.-M.
, and
Yan
,
D.
,
2021
, “
An Incremental Equivalent Circular Contact Model for Rough Surfaces
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
143
(
8
), p.
081503
.
5.
Bush
,
A.
,
Gibson
,
R.
, and
Thomas
,
T.
,
1975
, “
The Elastic Contact of a Rough Surface
,”
Wear
,
35
(
1
), pp.
87
111
.
6.
Greenwood
,
J.
,
2006
, “
A Simplified Elliptic Model of Rough Surface Contact
,”
Wear
,
261
(
2
), pp.
191
200
.
7.
Carbone
,
G.
,
2009
, “
A Slightly Corrected Greenwood and Williamson Model Predicts Asymptotic Linearity Between Contact Area and Load
,”
J. Mech. Phys. Solids
,
57
(
7
), pp.
1093
1102
.
8.
Carbone
,
G.
, and
Bottiglione
,
F.
,
2008
, “
Asperity Contact Theories: Do They Predict Linearity Between Contact Area and Load?
J. Mech. Phys. Solids
,
56
(
8
), pp.
2555
2572
.
9.
Johnson
,
K. L.
, and
Johnson
,
K. L.
,
1987
,
Contact Mechanics
,
Cambridge University Press
,
Cambridge
.
10.
Greenwood
,
J.
,
1997
, “
Analysis of Elliptical Hertzian Contacts
,”
Tribol. Int.
,
30
(
3
), pp.
235
237
.
11.
Nayak
,
P. R.
,
1971
, “
Random Process Model of Rough Surfaces
,”
ASME J. Lubr. Technol.
,
93
(
3
), pp.
398
407
.
12.
Manners
,
W.
, and
Greenwood
,
J.
,
2006
, “
Some Observations on Persson’s Diffusion Theory of Elastic Contact
,”
Wear
,
261
(
5–6
), pp.
600
610
.
13.
Brown
,
S. R.
, and
Scholz
,
C. H.
,
1985
, “
Closure of Random Elastic Surfaces in Contact
,”
J. Geophys. Res.: Solid Earth
,
90
(
B7
), pp.
5531
5545
.
14.
Wen
,
J.
,
He
,
H.
,
Niu
,
C.
,
Rong
,
M.
,
Huang
,
Y.
, and
Wu
,
Y.
,
2022
, “
An Improved Equivalent Capacitance Model of the Triboelectric Nanogenerator Incorporating Its Surface Roughness
,”
Nano Energy
,
96
, p.
107070
.
15.
Xu
,
Y.
,
2017
, “Statistical Models of Nominally Flat Rough Surface Contact,” PhD thesis, Auburn University, Auburn, AL.
You do not currently have access to this content.