Abstract

The contact zone between two steel components can be identified by utilizing a pressure measurement film in the contact between them. To reduce the number of necessary experiments, it is possible to simulate the contact situation using “finite element analysis.” This analysis requires material models for the contact partners and for the pressure measurement films. It is known that the pressure measurement film deforms not only elastically but also plastically. Taking this plastic deformation into account requires an appropriate material model such as the Drucker–Prager model. Based on published data of experiments with pressure measurement films that had been inserted between smooth and rough Hertzian bodies, we developed material models for three pressure measurement films. The roughness of a Hertzian body was studied by determining multiple pressure–clearance curves for three different surface roughnesses and for three different pressure measurement films. These curves were developed with micromodels, which represented a small section of the rough contact surface. An average curve for each material was then implemented in the macromodel for each roughness representing the contact situation. Subsequently, the resulting contact areas were compared with the published experimental data. This comparison showed that the material model for the smooth contact was able to emulate the experimentally determined contact areas. Including the pressure–clearance curves in the material model allowed the simulation of the rough contact situation. However, the deviation between the simulated and the experimental data was slightly larger for the rough surface than for the smooth surface.

References

1.
Dörner
,
F.
,
Bettinger
,
T.
, and
Schindler
,
C.
,
2017
, “
Sensitivity Analysis of the Wheel–Rail Normal Contact on the Basis of Continuous Factors
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part F J. Rail Rapid Transit
,
231
(
9
), pp.
1022
1034
.
2.
Wu
,
J. Z.
,
Herzog
,
W.
, and
Epstein
,
M.
,
1998
, “
Effects of Inserting a Pressensor Film Into Articular Joints on the Actual Contact Mechanics
,”
ASME J. Biomech. Eng.
,
120
(
5
), pp.
655
659
.
3.
Fujifilm Europe GmbH
,
n.d.
, “
Pressure Measuring Film FUJI PRESCALE FILM: Mono-Sheet Type for Medium Pressure
.” https://www.fujifilm.eu/fileadmin/products/prescale/media/Mono_Sheet_Type_for_Medium_Pressure_klein.pdf.
4.
Dörner
,
F.
,
Bettinger
,
T.
,
Lekue
,
J.
, and
Schindler
,
C.
,
2016
, “
Validation of Finite Element Simulations for Wheel–Rail Normal Contact
,”
Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Railway Technology: Research, Development and Maintenance
,
Cagliari, Sardinia, Italy
,
Apr. 5–8
,
Civil-Comp Press
,
Stirlingshire
.
5.
Kleiner
,
O.
, and
Schindler
,
C.
,
2012
, “
Geometry and Compressive Stresses in Wheel/Rail Contact
,”
Railway Tech. Rev.
,
52
, pp.
24
28
.
6.
Dörner
,
F.
,
2016
, “
Methode zur Verifizierung und Validierung von Finite-Elemente-Berechnungen des Rad-Schiene-Normalkontakts
,” Dissertation,
Technische Universität Kaiserslauter
,
Kaiserslautern
.
7.
Aymerich
,
F.
, and
Pau
,
M.
,
2004
, “
Assessment of Nominal Contact Area Parameters by Means of Ultrasonic Waves
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
126
(
4
), pp.
639
645
.
8.
Lekue
,
J.
,
Dörner
,
F.
, and
Schindler
,
C.
,
2021
, “
Calibration of a Finite Element Model of Prescale Film for Wheel–Rail Normal Contact Area Measurements
,”
Meccanica
,
56
(
12
), pp.
3097
3106
.
9.
Lekue
,
J.
,
2022
,
Error Estimation in Wheel–Rail Normal Contact Area Measurements Using Pressure Sensitive Film
, 1st ed.,
Apprimus Wissenschaftsverlag
,
Aachen
.
10.
Dörner
,
F.
,
Körblein
,
C.
, and
Schindler
,
C.
,
2014
, “
On the Accuracy of the Pressure Measurement Film in Hertzian Contact Situations Similar to Wheel–Rail Contact Applications
,”
Wear
,
317
(
1–2
), pp.
241
245
.
11.
Iwnicki
,
S.
,
Björklund
,
S.
, and
Enblom
,
R.
,
2009
, “Wheel–Rail Contact Mechanics,”
Wheel–Rail Interface Handbook
,
R.
Lewis
and
U.
Olofsson
, eds.,
CRC Press
,
Boca Raton, FL, Oxford
, pp.
58
92
.
12.
Greenwood
,
J. A.
,
Johnson
,
K. L.
, and
Matsubara
,
E.
,
1984
, “
A Surface Roughness Parameter in Hertz Contact
,”
Wear
,
100
(
1–3
), pp.
47
57
.
13.
Lekue
,
J.
,
Dörner
,
F.
, and
Schindler
,
C.
,
2018
, “
Multiscale Finite Element Modeling of Wheel–Rail Rough Normal Contact Measurements Using Pressure Measurement Film
,”
Tribol. Trans.
,
61
(
5
), pp.
972
978
.
14.
Lekue
,
J.
,
Dörner
,
F.
, and
Schindler
,
C.
,
2018
, “
On the Source of the Systematic Error of the Pressure Measurement Film Applied to Wheel–Rail Normal Contact Measurements
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
140
(
2
), p.
024501
.
15.
Drucker
,
D. C.
, and
Prager
,
W.
,
1952
, “
Soil Mechanics and Plastic Analysis or Limit Design
,”
Q. Appl. Math.
,
10
(
2
), pp.
157
165
.
16.
Haufe
,
A.
,
Bois
,
P.
,
Kolling
,
S.
, and
Feucht
,
M.
,
2005
, “
A Semi-Analytical Model for Polymers Subjected to High Strain Rates
,”
Fifth European LS-DYNA Users’ Conference, 2b-58
,
Birmingham, UK
,
May 25–26
.
17.
Alejano
,
L. R.
, and
Bobet
,
A.
,
2015
, “Drucker–Prager Criterion,”
The ISRM Suggested Methods for Rock Characterization, Testing and Monitoring: 2007–2014
,
R.
Ulusay
, ed.,
Springer International Publishing
,
Cham
, pp.
247
252
.
19.
Erlicher
,
S.
, and
Point
,
N.
,
2005
, “
On the Associativity of the Drucker–Prager Model
,”
Computational Plasticity: Fundamentals and Applications; Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Computational Plasticity
,
Barcelona, Spain
,
Sept. 5–7
,
International Center for Numerical Methods in Engineering (CIMNE)
,
Barcelona, Spain
.
20.
Daves
,
W.
, and
Fischer
,
F.
,
2002
, “
Modelling of the Plastification Near the Rough Surface of a Rail by the Wheel–Rail Contact
,”
Wear
,
253
(
1–2
), pp.
241
246
.
21.
Epee
,
A. F.
,
Lauro
,
F.
,
Bennani
,
B.
, and
Bourel
,
B.
,
2011
, “
Constitutive Model for a Semi-Crystalline Polymer Under Dynamic Loading
,”
Int. J. Solids Struct.
,
48
(
10
), pp.
1590
1599
.
You do not currently have access to this content.