While the area of functional safety for industry has evolved over the years by developing well-renowned standards and methods proven in use, such standards are not present in the field of equipment protection for complex research facilities. Research facilities in particular do typically not apply global, systematic approaches for functional equipment protection, but rather rely on system expert judgment for the individual systems, often leaving out the emergent properties of complex systems of systems. With the increasing demands on research facilities to be highly reliable and available, comparable to industrial facilities, a holistic and systematic method for equipment protection is, if not necessary, highly beneficial. This paper describes the development of a risk management method named functional protection, and benchmarks its lifecycle steps toward the IEC 61508 functional safety standard as well as the ISO 31000 risk management standard. The functional protection method is currently applied for the design and construction of the European Spallation Source in Lund, Sweden.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
September 2019
Research-Article
A Functional Protection Method for Availability and Cost Risk Management of Complex Research Facilities
R. Andersson,
R. Andersson
Protection Systems Group,
European Spallation Source ERIC,
Lund 22100, Sweden;
Department of Physics,
University of Oslo,
Oslo 0316, Norway
e-mail: riccard.andersson@esss.se
European Spallation Source ERIC,
Lund 22100, Sweden;
Department of Physics,
University of Oslo,
Oslo 0316, Norway
e-mail: riccard.andersson@esss.se
Search for other works by this author on:
E. Bargalló,
E. Bargalló
Protection Systems Group,
European Spallation Source ERIC,
Lund 22100, Sweden
European Spallation Source ERIC,
Lund 22100, Sweden
Search for other works by this author on:
A. Nordt
A. Nordt
Protection Systems Group,
European Spallation Source ERIC,
Lund 22100, Sweden
European Spallation Source ERIC,
Lund 22100, Sweden
Search for other works by this author on:
R. Andersson
Protection Systems Group,
European Spallation Source ERIC,
Lund 22100, Sweden;
Department of Physics,
University of Oslo,
Oslo 0316, Norway
e-mail: riccard.andersson@esss.se
European Spallation Source ERIC,
Lund 22100, Sweden;
Department of Physics,
University of Oslo,
Oslo 0316, Norway
e-mail: riccard.andersson@esss.se
E. Bargalló
Protection Systems Group,
European Spallation Source ERIC,
Lund 22100, Sweden
European Spallation Source ERIC,
Lund 22100, Sweden
A. Nordt
Protection Systems Group,
European Spallation Source ERIC,
Lund 22100, Sweden
European Spallation Source ERIC,
Lund 22100, Sweden
Manuscript received May 28, 2017; final manuscript received March 26, 2019; published online June 10, 2019. Assoc. Editor: James Lambert.
ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B. Sep 2019, 5(3): 031002 (9 pages)
Published Online: June 10, 2019
Article history
Received:
May 28, 2017
Revised:
March 26, 2019
Citation
Andersson, R., Bargalló, E., and Nordt, A. (June 10, 2019). "A Functional Protection Method for Availability and Cost Risk Management of Complex Research Facilities." ASME. ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B. September 2019; 5(3): 031002. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4043409
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
The ASME Ayyub-Wiechel Risk Analysis Award
ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B (December 2024)
Uncertainty Quantification In The Prediction of Remaining Useful Life Considering Multiple Failure Modes
ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B
A data driven black box approach for the inverse quantification of set-theoretical uncertainty
ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B
Identification of crashworthy designs combining active learning and the solution space methodology
ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B
Related Articles
Risk Assessment Methodology for Electric-Current Induced Drowning Accidents
ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B (September,2016)
Dr. Romney B. Duffey on His 80th Birthday
ASME J of Nuclear Rad Sci (July,2022)
A Blended Learning Approach to Project Risk Management: Developing Requirements and Evaluating the Student Learning Experience
J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng (September,2011)
Identifying Structural Breaks in Stochastic Mortality Models
ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B (June,2015)
Articles from Part A: Civil Engineering
Vulnerability Analysis of Interdependent Infrastructure Systems Based on Inoperability Input–Output Models
ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering (September,2021)
Mental Models of Navigation Safety to Inform Risk Management Decisions: Case Study on the Houston Ship Channel
ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering (September,2018)
Asset Risk Management and Resilience for Flood Control, Hydropower, and Waterways
ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering (December,2016)
Probabilistic Risk Management Framework for Tolerance-Related Issues in Modularized Projects: Local and Global Perspectives
ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering (March,2020)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Introduction
Managing Risks in Design & Construction Projects
Identification and Analysis of Risk
Managing Risks in Design & Construction Projects
Occupational Risk and Health System Design Process
International Conference on Instrumentation, Measurement, Circuits and Systems (ICIMCS 2011)