Abstract

Hydrogen energy is a kind of clean secondary energy sources. Mixed hydrogen natural gas transportation technology is a new scheme of hydrogen transportation. Using natural gas pipe to transport hydrogen is expected to further promote its application. In order to study the mechanical properties of buried steel pipe under seismic waves, a numerical model is established. The time history and stress distribution of pipe section under seismic wave are analyzed. Effects of seismic intensity, surrounding soil, buried depth and seismic wave type on pipe's mechanical properties are discussed. The results show that the pipe section stress fluctuates under seismic wave, and the stress shifting effect occurs. The maximum stress is located in the directions of 45 deg, 135 deg, 225 deg, and 315 deg. Stress increases with the increasing of seismic intensity, and the stress distribution of pipe section is also changed. Stress responses of the pipe in different soil are different, and the stress distribution of pipe section at the maximum stress time is similar. The deeper the buried depth is, the greater the pipe stress is. Pipe stress is related to the maximum acceleration of the seismic wave and spectrum characteristics. Those results can provide a basis for the design and safety evaluation of mixed hydrogen natural gas pipes.

References

1.
Bo
,
M.
,
2016
,
Investigation on Material Property Degradation and Failure Consequence of the High-Pressure Natural Gas/Hvdrogen Blends Pipe
, Zhe
Jiang University
, Hang Zhou, China.
2.
Ziliang
,
L.
,
Sijiang
,
X.
, and
Jingyang
,
Z.
,
2020
, “
Comparative Analysis of Hydrogen Pipeline and Natural Gas Pipeline
,”
Pressure Vessel Technol.
,
37
(
2
), pp.
56
63
.
3.
Chengshang
,
Z. H.
, and
Tongwen
,
L.
,
2021
, “
Research Progress of Hydrogen Transport Technology for Blended Hydrogen Natural Gas
,”
J. Central South Univ.
,
52
(
1
), pp.
31
43
.
4.
Wu
,
Y.
,
Meng
,
B.
,
Wang
,
L.
, and
Qin
,
G.
,
2020
, “
Seismic Vulnerability Analysis of Buried Polyethylene Pipeline Based on Finite Element Method
,”
Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping
,
187
, p.
104167
.10.1016/j.ijpvp.2020.104167
5.
Jiantao
,
H.
,
Huaifa
,
M.
, and
Boyan
,
Z.
,
2010
, “
Method and Realization of Seismic Motion Input of Viscous-Spring Boundary
,”
J. Hydraul. Eng.
,
41
(
8
), pp.
960
969
.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/291234298_Method_and_realization_of_seismic_motion_input_of_viscous-spring_boundary
6.
Liyun
,
L.
,
Xiaoxiao
,
L.
, and
Xiuli
,
D.
,
2015
, “
Analysis on Numerical Simulation Model for Seismic Response of a Buried Pipeline
,”
Earthquake Eng. Eng. Dyn.
,
35
(
6
), pp.
106
113
.
7.
Runlin
,
L.
,
2018
,
Seismic Response Analysis of Buried Pipeline in Slope Conditions
,
Harbin Institute of Technology
, Harbin, China.
8.
Jingqi
,
H.
,
2015
,
Study on Nonlinear Seismic Response of Rock Tunnels
,
Beijing University of Technology
, Beijing, China.
9.
Hao
,
Z.
,
2015
,
Response of Buried Elbow Pipeline Under Oblique Incidence Seismic Wave
,
Harbin Institute of Technology
, Harbin, China.
10.
Houqun
,
C.
,
2016
, “
Discussion on Seismic Input Mechanism at Dam Site
,”
J. Hydraul. Eng.
, 37(12), pp.
1417
1423
.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/292290036_Discussion_on_seismic_input_mechanism_at_dam_site
11.
Xiuli
,
D.
, and
Mi
,
Z.
,
2006
, “
Analysis Method for Seismic Response of Arch Dams in Time Domain Based on Viscous-Spring Artificial Boundary Condition
,”
J. Hydraul. Eng.
, 37(9), pp.
1063
1069
.
12.
Zigang
,
X.
,
Xiuli
,
D.
, and
Chengshun
,
X.
,
2019
, “
Comparison of Determination Methods of Site Rayleigh Damping Coefficients in Seismic Responses Analysis of Underground Structures
,”
Rock Soil Mech.
,
40
(
12
), pp.
4838
4847
.10.16285/j.rsm.2018.1913
13.
Sheng
,
H.
,
2010
,
Research on Failure Mechanism and Aseismic Measures for Unergound Engineering Under High Intensity Earthquake
, Wuhan Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics,
Chinese Academy of Sciences
,
Beijing, China
.
14.
Polynikis
,
V.
,
Spyros A
,
K.
, and
Panos
,
D.
,
2010
, “
Finite Element Analysis of Buried Steel Pipelines Under Strike-Slip Fault Displacements
,”
Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng.
,
30
(
11
), pp.
1361
1376
.10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.06.011
15.
Jie
,
Z.
,
Yao
,
X.
, and
Zheng
,
L.
,
2018
, “
Mechanical Behaviors and Failure Mechanisms of Buried Polyethylene Pipes Crossing Active Strike-Slip Faults
,”
Compos. Part B
,
154
, pp.
449
466
.10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.09.006
16.
Feng
,
G.
, and
Fengbing
,
Z.
,
2011
, “
Study on Transformation Method for Artificial Boundaries in Static-Dynamic Analysis of Underground Structure
,”
J. Vib. Shock
,
30
(
11
), pp.
165
170
.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/294714202_Study_on_transformation_method_for_artificial_boundaries_in_static-dynamic_analysis_of_underground_structure
17.
Wenran
,
C.
,
Ningning
,
S.
, and
Haifeng
,
D.
,
2018
, “
Experimental Study on Dynamic Interaction Between Pipe and Soil Under Earthquake Excitation
,”
Pet. Eng. Constr.
,
43
(
4
), pp.
1
6
.
You do not currently have access to this content.