This paper describes probabilistic fracture mechanics calculations that simulate fatigue crack growth, flaw detection, flaw sizing accuracy, and the impacts of flaw acceptance criteria. The numerical implementation of the model is based on a Latin hypercube approach. Calculations have been performed for a range of parameters. For representative values of flaw detection probability, flaw sizing errors, and flaw acceptance criteria, detection capability is the most limiting factor with regard to the ability of the inservice inspections to reduce leak probabilities. However, gross sizing errors or significant relaxations of current flaw acceptance standards could negate the benefits of outstanding probability of detection capabilities.

Issue Section:
Research Papers
Topics:
Errors, Pipes, Reliability, Vessels, Acceptance criteria, Probability, Flaw detection, Fatigue cracks, Fracture mechanics, In-service inspection, Leakage
1.
Cowfer, C. D., 1989, “Basis/Background for ASME Code Section XI Proposed Appendix VIII: Ultrasonic Examination Performance Demonstration,” ASME NDE-Vol. 5, pp. 1–5.
2.
Electric Power Research Institute, 1989, “Accuracy of Ultrasonic Flaw Sizing Techniques for Reactor Pressure Vessels,” Report NP-6273.
3.
Harris, D. O., and Dedhia, D. D., 1991, “Theoretical and User’s Manual for pc-PRAISE, A Probabilistic Fracture Mechanics Computer Code for Piping Reliability Analysis,” NUREG/CR-5864, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington DC.
4.
Khaleel
M. A.
, and
Simonen
F. A.
,
1994
a, “
A Parametric Approach to Predicting the Effects of Fatigue on Piping Reliability
,”
ASME PVP
-Vol.
288
, Service Experience and Reliability Improvement: Nuclear, Fossil and Petrochemical Plants, Vol. 1, pp.
117
–
125
.
5.
Khaleel
M. A.
, and
Simonen
F. A.
,
1994
b, “
The Effects of Initial Flaw Sizes and Inservice Inspection on Piping Reliability
,”
ASME PVP
-Vol.
288
, Service Experience and Reliability Improvement: Nuclear, Fossil and Petrochemical Plants, Vol. 1, pp.
95
–
107
.
6.
Khaleel
M. A.
, and
Simonen
F. A.
,
1995
, “
A Model for Predicting Vessel Failure Probabilities Due to Fatigue Crack Growth
,”
ASME PVP
-Vol.
304
, Fatigue and Fracture Mechanics in Pressure Vessels and Piping, pp.
401
–
416
.
7.
Khaleel, M. A., Simonen, F. A., Harris, D. O., and Dedhia, D., 1995, “The Impact of Inspection on Intergranular Stress Corrosion Cracking for Stainless Steel Piping,” ASME PVP-Vol. 266/SERA-Vol. 3, Risk and Safety Assessment: Where is the Balance, pp. 411–422.
8.
Nichols, R. W., and Crutzen, S., eds., 1988, Ultrasonic Inspection of Heavy Section Steel Components: The PISC-II Final Report, Elsevier Applied Science Publishers, London and New York.
9.
Simonen, F. A., 1990, “An Evaluation of the Impact of Inservice Inspection on Stress Corrosion Cracking of BWR Piping,” Codes and Standards and Applications for Design and Analysis of Pressure Vessel and Piping Components, ASME PVP-Vol. 186, NDE-Vol. 7, pp. 187–193.
10.
Woo, H. H., and Simonen, F. A., 1984, “The Impact of Inservice Inspection on the Reliability of Nuclear Piping,” ASME PVP-Vol. 92, Advances in Probabilistic Fracture Mechanics.
This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright © 1998
 by The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
You do not currently have access to this content.