Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) has been used to study the seabed boundary layer flow around monopile and gravity-based offshore wind turbine foundations. The gravity-based foundation has a hexagonal bottom slab (bottom part). The objective of the present study is to investigate the formation of horseshoe vortex and flow structures around two different bottom-fixed offshore wind turbine foundations in order to provide an assessment of potential scour for engineering design. Three-dimensional CFD simulations have been performed using Spalart–Allmaras delayed detached eddy simulation (SADDES) at a Reynolds number 4 × 106 based on the freestream velocity and the diameter of the monopile foundation, D. A seabed boundary layer flow with a boundary layer thickness D is assumed for all the simulations. Vortical structures, time-averaged results of velocity distributions and bed shear stresses are computed. The numerical results are discussed by studying the difference in flows around the monopile and the gravity-based foundations. A distinct horseshoe vortex is found in front of the monopile foundation. Two small horseshoe vortices are found in front of the hexagonal gravity-based foundation, i.e., one is on the top of the bottom slab and one is near the seabed in front of the bottom slab. The horseshoe vortex size for the hexagonal gravity-based foundation is found to be smaller than that for the monopile foundation. The effects of different foundation geometries on destroying the formation of horseshoe vortices (which is the main cause of scour problems) are discussed.

References

1.
DHI Group
,
2012
, “
Predicting Scour in Offshore Wind Turbines—Now a Breeze
,” DHI Group, Denmark, accessed June 10, 2015, http://worldwide.dhigroup.com/
2.
European Wind Energy Association
,
2015
, “
The European Offshore Wind Industry—Key Trends and Statistics 2014
,” EWEA, Brussels, Belgium, accessed June 10, 2015, http://www.ewea.org/fileadmin/fles/library/publications/statistics/EWEA-European-Offshore-Statistics-2014.pdf
3.
Sumer
,
B. M.
, and
Fredsøe
,
J.
,
2002
,
The Mechanics of Scour in the Marine Environment
,
World Scientific
,
Singapore
, Chap. 3.
4.
Roulund
,
A.
,
Sumer
,
B. M.
,
Fredsøe
,
J.
, and
Michelsen
,
J.
,
2005
, “
Numerical and Experimental Investigation of Flow and Scour Around a Circular Pile
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
,
534
, pp.
351
401
.
5.
Dargahi
,
B.
,
1989
, “
The Turbulent Flow Field Around a Circular Cylinder
,”
Exp. Fluids
,
8
(1), pp.
1
12
.
6.
Baker
,
C. J.
,
1979
, “
The Laminar Horseshoe Vortex
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
,
95
(
2
), pp.
347
367
.
7.
O'Riordan
,
N. J.
, and
Clare
,
D. G.
,
1990
, “
Geotechnical Considerations for the Installation of Gravity Base Structures
,”
22nd Offshore Technology Conference
(
OTC
), Houston, TX, May 7–10, Paper No. OTC 6381.
8.
Wilms
,
M.
,
Stahlmann
,
A.
, and
Schlurmann
,
T.
,
2012
, “
Investigations on Scour Development Around a Gravity Foundation for Offshore Wind Turbines
,”
Coastal Eng. Proc.
,
1
(
33
), p.
35
.
9.
Jeppsson
,
J.
,
Larsen
,
P. E.
, and
Larsson
,
Å.
,
2008
, “
Technical Description Lillgrund Wind Power Plant
,” Lillgrund Pilot Project, Vattenfall Vindkraft AB, Sweden, Report No.
21858-1
.
10.
Weller
,
H. G.
,
Tabor
,
G.
,
Jasak
,
H.
, and
Fureby
,
C.
,
1998
, “
A Tensorial Approach to Computational Continuum Mechanics Using Object-Oriented Techniques
,”
Comput. Phys.
,
12
(
6
), pp.
620
631
.
11.
Gainer
,
T. G.
,
Morrison
,
J. H.
,
Rivers
,
S. M.
,
Mysko
,
S. J.
, and
Witkowski
,
D. P.
,
2001
, “
CFD Sensitivity Analysis of a Modern Civil Transport Near Buffet-Onset Conditions
,” NASA, Hanover, VA, Report No.
TM-2001-211263
.
12.
Spalart
,
P. R.
,
Deck
,
S.
,
Shur
,
M. L.
,
Squires
,
K. D.
,
Strelets
,
M. K.
, and
Travin
,
A.
,
2006
, “
A New Version of Detached-Eddy Simulation, Resistant to Ambiguous Grid Densities
,”
Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn.
,
20
(
3
), pp.
181
195
.
13.
Ong
,
M. C.
,
Utnes
,
T.
,
Holmedal
,
L. E.
,
Myrhaug
,
D.
, and
Pettersen
,
B.
,
2010
, “
Numerical Simulation of Flow Around a Circular Cylinder Close to a Flat Seabed at High Reynolds Numbers Using a k–ε Model
,”
Coastal Eng.
,
57
(
10
), pp.
931
947
.
14.
Sumer
,
B. M.
, and
Fredsøe
,
J.
,
2006
,
Hydrodynamics Around Cylindrical Structures
(Advanced Series on Ocean Engineering), Revised Edition, Vol.
26
,
World Scientific
,
Singapore
, Chap. 2.
15.
Ong
,
M. C.
,
Utnes
,
T.
,
Holmedal
,
L. E.
,
Myrhaug
,
D.
, and
Pettersen
,
B.
,
2009
, “
Numerical Simulation of Flow Around a Smooth Circular Cylinder at Very High Reynolds Numbers
,”
Mar. Struct.
,
22
(
2
), pp.
142
153
.
16.
Jeong
,
J.
, and
Hussain
,
F.
,
1995
, “
On the Identification of a Vortex
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
,
285
, pp.
69
94
.
17.
Petersen
,
T. U.
,
Sumer
,
B. M.
,
Fredsøe
,
J.
,
Raaijmakers
,
T. C.
, and
Schouten
,
J.
,
2015
, “
Edge Scour at Scour Protections Around Piles in the Marine Environment—Laboratory and Field Investigation
,”
Coastal Eng.
,
106
, pp.
42
72
.
You do not currently have access to this content.