Abstract

Uncertainty and sensitivity methods are increasingly used in safety analyzes of nuclear power plants to address the unreliability of input data, numerical models, and, in general, the lack of knowledge regarding certain physical phenomena, in determining safety margins and acceptance criteria. The ASYST code, developed as part of an international nuclear technology ASYST Development and Training Program (ADTP) managed by Innovative Systems Software (ISS), is used to perform an uncertainty analysis of the QUENCH-02 experiment conducted at the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology. The code uses a probabilistic methodology based on the propagation of input uncertainties. The QUENCH facility contains electrically heated PWR fuel rod simulators and the aim of the experiment is to examine hydrogen generation and the behavior of the fuel rod cladding during core reflood. For selected input parameters, such as steam/water flow, electrical power, and other relevant boundary conditions, it is necessary to define their probability density functions. Input databases are then prepared for individual calculations based on the selected confidence level and confidence interval. The number of performed calculations is 60, large enough to ensure at least 95% coverage of expected output results and uncertainty limits. The results of the calculations are compared with the experimental measurements. The Pearson correlation coefficient is used to obtain correlation between the input uncertain parameters and the output data. Sensitivity analyses cover the influence of variations in the heater's electrical power and the steam flow rate on the hydrogen production and the maximum cladding temperature.

References

1.
ASYST
,
2020
,
ASYST THA VER 3 Manuals
,
Innovative Systems Software
, Idaho Falls, ID.
2.
Hofmann
,
P.
,
Homann
,
C.
,
Leiling
,
W.
,
Miassoedov
,
A.
,
Piel
,
D.
,
Schanz
,
G.
,
Schmidt
,
L.
,
Sepold
,
L.
, and
Steinbrueck
,
M.
,
2000
,
Experimental and Calculational Results of the Experiments. QUENCH-02 and QUENCH-03
,
Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe
, Karlsruhe, Germany, Report No. FZKA 6295.
3.
Schanz
,
G.
,
Hagen
,
S.
,
Hofmann
,
P.
,
Schumacher
,
G.
, and
Sepold
,
L.
,
1992
, “
Information on the Evolution of Severe LWR Fuel Element Damage Obtained in the CORA Program
,”
J. Nucl. Mater.
,
188
, pp.
131
145
.10.1016/0022-3115(92)90462-T
4.
Šadek
,
S.
,
Grgić
,
D.
,
Allison
,
C.
, and
Perez-Ferragut
,
M.
,
2022
, “
Uncertainty Study of the in-Vessel Phase of a Severe Accident in a Pressurized Water Reactor
,”
Energies
,
15
(
5
), p.
1842
.10.3390/en15051842
5.
Perez
,
M.
,
Reventos
,
F.
,
Wagner
,
R.
, and
Allison
,
C.
,
2009
, “
Integrated Uncertainty Analysis Using RELAP/SCDAPSIM/MOD4.0
,” Proceedings of the 13th International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Reactor Thermal Hydraulics (
NURETH-13
), Kanazawa City, Ishikawa Prefecture, Japan, Sept. 27–Oct. 2, Paper No. N13P1252.https://inis.iaea.org/search/search.aspx?orig_q=RN:43036728
6.
Allison
,
C. M.
,
Hohorst
,
J. K.
,
Ezzidi
,
A.
,
Naitoh
,
M.
, and
Pericas
,
R.
,
2020
, “
Development and Preliminary Assessment of the New ASYST - ISA Integral Analysis BEPU Code Using the PBF SFD-ST Bundle Heating and Melting Experiment, a Typical BWR Under Fukushima-Daiichi-Accident-Like Thermal Hydraulic Conditions and PWR for a Steam Line Break in the Containment
,”
Proceedings of ICAPP 2020
, Abu Dhabi, UAE, Mar. 15–19, Paper No. 20221.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338281786_Development_and_Preliminary_Assessment_of_the_new_ASYST_-_ISA_Integral_Analysis_BEPU_Code_using_the_PBF_SFD-ST_Bundle_Heating_and_Melting_Experiment_a_Typical_BWR_Under_Fukushima-Daiichi-Accident-Like
7.
Trivedi
,
A. K.
,
Perez-Ferragut
,
M.
,
Hohorst
,
J. K.
, and
Allison
,
C.
,
2018
, “
Integrated Uncertainty Analysis of LBLOCA in AP1000 Using RELAP/SCDAPSIM
,”
Proceedings of the 12th International Conference of the Croatian Nuclear Society
, Zadar, Croatia, June 3–6, Paper No. 139.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325694276_Integrated_uncertainty_analysis_of_LBLOCA_in_AP1000_using_RELAPSCDAPSIM
8.
Allison
,
C.
,
Le
,
B. T.
,
Gerova
,
G.
,
Spasov
,
I.
,
Perez-Ferragut
,
M.
, and
Hohorst
,
J.
,
2018
, “
QUENCH-06 Experiment Post-Test Calculations and Integrated Uncertainty Analysis With RELAP/SCDAPSIM/MOD3.4 and MOD3.5
,”
ASME
Paper No. ICONE26-81912.10.1115/ICONE26-81912
9.
Špalj
,
S.
,
Šadek
,
S.
, and
Honaiser
,
E.
,
2002
, “
Analysis of International Standard Problem ISP-45 on QUENCH Facility Using RELAP5/SCDAPSIM/MOD3.2 Computer Code
,”
Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Nuclear Option in Countries With Small and Medium Electricity Grids
, Dubrovnik, Croatia, June 16–20, Paper No. S5-15.
10.
Šadek
,
S.
,
Debrecin
,
N.
, and
Špalj
,
S.
,
2008
, “
QUENCH-11 Experiment Analysis With RELAP5/SCDAPSIM Code
,”
Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Nuclear Option in Countries With Small and Medium Electricity Grids
, Dubrovnik, Croatia, May 25–29, Paper No. S5-66.https://inis.iaea.org/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/39/122/39122967.pdf
11.
Hering
,
W.
,
Homann
,
C.
,
Lamy
,
J.-S.
,
Miassoedov
,
A.
,
Schanz
,
G.
,
Sepold
,
L.
, and
Steinbrueck
,
M.
,
2002
,
Comparison and Interpretation Report of the OECD International Standard Problem No. 45 Exercise (QUENCH-06 Experiment)
,
OECD Publishing
,
Paris
, Report No. NEA/CSNI/R(2002)23, FZKA 6722.
12.
Wilks
,
S. S.
,
1941
, “
Determination of Sample Sizes for Setting Tolerance Limits
,”
Ann. Math. Stat.
,
12
(
1
), pp.
91
96
.10.1214/aoms/1177731788
13.
Hering
,
W.
,
Homann
,
C.
, and
Lamy
,
J.-S.
,
2002
,
Comparison Report on the Blind Phase of the OECD International Standard Problem No. 45 Exercise (QUENCH-06)
,
Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe
, Karlsruhe, Germany, Report No. FZKA 6677.
14.
SCDAP/RELAP5 Development Team
,
1997
, “
SCDAP/RELAP5/MOD3.2 Code Manual, Volume 4: MATPRO – A Library of Materials Properties for LWR Accident Analysis
,” Idaho National Engineering Laboratory, Idaho Falls, ID, Report No. NUREG/CR-6150, INEL-96/0422, Rev. 1.
You do not currently have access to this content.