Abstract

Determination of the present condition of grade 91 steels commonly used in fossil plants presents an ongoing challenge for the industry. Current individual methods of nondestructive evaluations (NDEs) are challenged to reliably determine steel microstructures and are impractical for deployment over large areas such as piping systems. This work investigates the discriminatory potential of an integral assessment combining multiple NDE techniques: magnetic methods (including coercive field, incremental permeability, and Barkhausen noise), thermoelectric power, and ultrasonic methods (including attenuation, backscatter, and absorption). Using a sample inventory of manufactured representative microstructure conditions in thin-walled tubes, five of the eight microstructure conditions could be identified by data fusion. Combined magnetic methods appeared as a primary technique, as this can identify four out of the eight conditions, while the ultrasonic methods can be seen as complimentary tests to increase confidence in classification and identify a fifth condition.

References

1.
EPRI
,
2013
,
Life Management of Creep-Strength-Enhanced Grade 91 Steels—Atlas of Microstructures: Base Metal
,
EPRI
,
Palo Alto, CA
.
2.
Huanes-Alvan
,
G.
,
Seuaciuc-Osorio
,
T.
, and
Chakrapani
,
S. K.
,
2021
, “
Ultrasonic Characterization of Grade 91 and 92 Steel With Different Heat Treatments
,”
Presented at the ASME 2021 QNDE
,
July 28–30
, Virtual Conference (QNDE2021-75091).
3.
Wilson
,
J.
, and
Peyton
,
A.
,
2021
, “
Magnetic Methods for the Identification of Incorrect Microstructures in Grade 91 Power Station Steels
,”
2021 48th Annual Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation
,
July 28–30
.
4.
Nagy
,
P. B.
, and
Robinson
,
E.
,
2021
, “
Microstructure Characterization in Martensitic Steels Using Thermoelectric NDE
,”
Presented at the ASME 2021 QNDE
,
July 28–30
, Virtual Conference (QNDE2021-74544).
5.
EPRI
,
2021
,
Nondestructive Microstructure Characterization of Temperate Martensitic Steels
,
EPRI
,
Palo Alto, CA
.
6.
Virtanen
,
P.
,
Gommers
,
R.
,
Oliphant
,
T. E.
,
Haberland
,
M.
,
Reddy
,
T.
,
Cournapeau
,
D.
,
Burovski
,
E.
, et al
,
2020
, “
SciPy 1.0: Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python
,”
Nat. Methods
,
17
(
3
), pp.
261
272
.
7.
Pedregosa
,
F.
,
Varoquaux
,
G.
,
Gramfort
,
A.
,
Michel
,
V.
,
Thirion
,
B.
,
Grisel
,
O.
,
Blondel
,
M.
, et al
,
2011
, “
Scikit-Learn: Machine Learning in Python
,”
J. Mach. Learn. Res.
,
12
(
85
), pp.
2825
2830
.
8.
McInnes
,
L.
,
Healy
,
J.
, and
Melville
,
J.
,
2018
, “
UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reduction
,” [Online], https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.03426v3, Accessed September 21, 2021.
9.
Rousseeuw
,
P. J.
,
1987
, “
Silhouettes: A Graphical Aid to the Interpretation and Validation of Cluster Analysis
,”
J. Comput. Appl. Math.
,
20
(
C
), pp.
53
65
.
10.
Yuan
,
C.
, and
Yang
,
H.
,
2019
, “
Research on K-Value Selection Method of K-Means Clustering Algorithm
,”
Multidiscipl. Sci. J.
,
2
(
2
), pp.
226
235
.
You do not currently have access to this content.