Reaching a balance between product form and function is one of the main challenges of design teams. When users make choices among products with similar functionality and price, esthetics becomes a decisive factor, and understanding how they are perceived through the product form can allow designers to create new designs with more appealing shapes. Gestalt principles explain how subjects group elements of a shape and devise them as a whole, and recent research has proposed their quantification for evaluation of esthetics. This work examines a previous methodology to quantify Gestalt principles of 2D product representations, in particular, expressions to measure the principles of symmetry, parallelism, and continuity are applied to parameterized forms, with a generic bottle silhouette as case study. First, the representation is divided into key atomistic elements, which are generated through cubic Bézier curves. Then, the quantifications of symmetry, parallelism, and continuity, in conjunction with gradient-based optimization, are used on these forms to generate bottle silhouettes with combinations of high and low levels of each principle. The resulting designs were submitted to a discrete choice study in which respondents selected the bottle silhouettes they found more appealing. The preference data were analyzed with both fixed and random coefficients multinomial logistic regression (mixed logit) to determine the part-worth utility of each Gestalt principle over esthetic preferences. In conclusion, the results show differences in the utility estimates of symmetry, parallelism, and continuity, and implications for designers are discussed.

References

1.
Sylcott
,
B.
,
Cagan
,
J.
, and
Tabibnia
,
G.
,
2013
, “
Understanding Consumer Tradeoffs Between Form and Function Through Metaconjoint and Cognitive Neuroscience Analyses
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
135
(
10
), p.
101002
.
2.
Hsiao
,
S.-W.
,
Chiu
,
F.-Y.
, and
Chen
,
C. S.
,
2008
, “
Applying Aesthetics Measurement to Product Design
,”
Int. J. Ind. Ergon.
,
38
(
11–12
), pp.
910
920
.
3.
Lugo
,
J. E.
,
Schmiedeler
,
J. P.
,
Batill
,
S. M.
, and
Carlson
,
L.
,
2016
, “
Relationship Between Product Aesthetic Subject Preference and Quantified Gestalt Principles in Automobile Wheel Rims
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
138
(
5
), p.
051101
.
4.
MacDonald
,
E.
,
Lubensky
,
A.
,
Sohns
,
B.
, and
Papalambros
,
P. Y.
,
2008
, “
Product Semantics and Wine Portfolio Optimisation
,”
Int. J. Prod. Dev.
,
7
(
1–2
), pp.
73
98
.
5.
Reid
,
T. N.
,
Gonzalez
,
R. D.
, and
Papalambros
,
P. Y.
,
2010
, “
Quantification of Perceived Environmental Friendliness for Vehicle Silhouette Design
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
132
(
10
), p.
101010
.
6.
Kelly
,
J.
, and
Papalambros
,
P.
,
2007
, “
Use of Shape Preference Information in Product Design
,”
16th International Conference on Engineering Design
, ICED, The Design Society, Paris, France, pp. 803–804.
7.
Orsborn
,
S.
,
Cagan
,
J.
, and
Boatwright
,
P.
,
2009
, “
Quantifying Aesthetic Form Preference in a Utility Function
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
131
(
6
), p.
061001
.
8.
Widiyati
,
K.
, and
Aoyama
,
H.
,
2011
, “
A Study of Kansei Engineering in PET Bottle Silhouette
,”
ASME
Paper No. DETC2011-48066.
9.
Sylcott
,
B.
,
Michalek
,
J. J.
, and
Cagan
,
J.
,
2013
, “
Towards Understanding the Role of Interaction Effects in Visual Conjoint Analysis
,”
ASME
Paper No. DETC2013-12622.
10.
Tovares
,
N.
,
Boatwright
,
P.
, and
Cagan
,
J.
,
2014
, “
Experiential Conjoint Analysis: An Experience-Based Method for Eliciting, Capturing, and Modeling Consumer Preference
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
136
(
10
), p.
101404
.
11.
Orbay
,
G.
,
Fu
,
L.
, and
Kara
,
L. B.
,
2015
, “
Deciphering the Influence of Product Shape on Consumer Judgments Through Geometric Abstraction
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
137
(
8
), p.
081103
.
12.
Lugo
,
J. E.
,
Batill
,
S. M.
, and
Carlson
,
L.
,
2012
, “
Modeling Product Form Preference Using Gestalt Principles, Semantic Space, and Kansei
,”
ASME
Paper No. DETC2012-70434.
13.
Wertheimer
,
M.
,
1923
, “
Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt, II
,”
Psychologische Forschung
,
4
(
1
), pp.
71
88
.
14.
Nan
,
L.
,
Sharf
,
A.
,
Xie
,
K.
,
Wong
,
T.-T.
,
Deussen
,
O.
,
Cohen-Or
,
D.
, and
Chen
,
B.
,
2011
, “
Conjoining Gestalt Rules for Abstraction of Architectural Drawings
,”
2011 ACM SIGGRAPH Asia Conference
, p.
185
.
15.
Kimball
,
M. A.
,
2013
, “
Visual Design Principles: An Empirical Study of Design Lore
,”
J. Tech. Writing Commun.
,
43
(
1
), pp.
3
41
.
16.
Durgee
,
J. F.
,
1988
, “
Product Drama
,”
J. Advertising Res.
,
28
(
1
), pp.
42
49
.
17.
Lugo
,
J. E.
,
Schmiedeler
,
J. P.
,
Batill
,
S. M.
, and
Carlson
,
L.
,
2015
, “
Quantification of Classical Gestalt Principles in Two-Dimensional Product Representations
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
137
(
9
), p.
094502
.
18.
Farin
,
G.
,
1997
,
Curves and Surfaces for Computer-Aided Geometric Design: A Practical Guide
,
Academic Press
,
San Diego, CA
.
19.
Oya
,
T.
,
Kimura
,
F.
, and
Aoyama
,
H.
,
2012
, “
Style Design System Based on Class A Bézier Curves for High-Quality Aesthetic Shapes
,”
ASME
Paper No. DETC2012-70859.
20.
Chang
,
K.-H.
,
2014
,
Product Design Modeling Using CAD/CAE
(The Computer Aided Engineering Design Series),
Academic Press
,
Waltham, MA
.
21.
Zwerina
,
K.
,
1997
,
Discrete Choice Experiments in Marketing
(Contributions to Management Science),
Physica-Verlag HD
,
Heidelberg, Germany
.
22.
Train
,
K. E.
,
2009
,
Discrete Choice Methods With Simulation
, 2nd ed.,
Cambridge University Press
,
New York
.
23.
Raghavarao
,
D.
,
Wiley
,
J. B.
, and
Chitturi
,
P.
,
2010
,
Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis: Models and Designs
,
CRC Press
, Boca Raton, FL.
24.
Kuhfeld
,
W. F.
,
2010
,
Marketing Research Methods in SAS: Experimental Design, Choice, Conjoint, and Graphical Techniques
,
SAS Institute
, Cary, NC.
25.
Louviere
,
J. J.
,
Flynn
,
T. N.
, and
Carson
,
R. T.
,
2010
, “
Discrete Choice Experiments Are Not Conjoint Analysis
,”
J. Choice Modell.
,
3
(
3
), pp.
57
72
.
26.
Wagemans
,
J.
,
Elder
,
J. H.
,
Kubovy
,
M.
,
Palmer
,
S. E.
,
Peterson
,
M. A.
,
Singh
,
M.
, and
von der Heydt
,
R.
,
2012
, “
A Century of Gestalt Psychology in Visual Perception: I. Perceptual Grouping and Figure-Ground Organization
,”
Psychol. Bull.
,
138
(
6
), pp.
1172
1217
.
27.
Wagemans
,
J.
,
Feldman
,
J.
,
Gepshtein
,
S.
,
Kimchi
,
R.
,
Pomerantz
,
J. R.
,
van der Helm
,
P. A.
, and
van Leeuwen
,
C.
,
2012
, “
A Century of Gestalt Psychology in Visual Perception: II. Conceptual and Theoretical Foundations
,”
Psychol. Bull.
,
138
(
6
), pp.
1218
1252
.
28.
Köhler
,
W.
,
2015
,
The Task of Gestalt Psychology
,
Princeton University Press
, Princeton, NJ.
29.
Koffka
,
K.
,
1935
,
Principles of Gestalt Psychology
,
Lund Humphries
,
London
.
30.
Pomerantz
,
J. R.
, and
Kubovy
,
M.
,
1981
, “
Perceptual Organization: An Overview
,”
Perceptual Organization
, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp.
423
456
.
31.
Ware
,
C.
,
2013
,
Information Visualization: Perception for Design
(Interactive Technologies),
Morgan Kaufmann
,
Waltham, MA
.
32.
Singh
,
M.
,
Seyranian
,
G. D.
, and
Hoffman
,
D. D.
,
1999
, “
Parsing Silhouettes: The Short-Cut Rule
,”
Percept. Psychophysics
,
61
(
4
), pp.
636
660
.
33.
Prats
,
M.
,
Earl
,
C.
,
Garner
,
S.
, and
Jowers
,
I.
,
2006
, “
Shape Exploration of Designs in a Style: Toward Generation of Product Designs
,”
AIE EDAM: Artif. Intell. Eng. Des., Anal., Manuf.
,
20
(03), pp.
201
215
.
34.
Pizlo
,
Z.
,
2008
,
3D Shape: Its Unique Place in Visual Perception
,
MIT Press
, London, UK.
35.
Jacobs
,
D.
,
2000
, “
What Makes Viewpoint Invariant Properties Perceptually Salient?: A Computational Perspective
,”
Perceptual Organization for Artificial Vision Systems
(The Kluwer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science), Vol.
546
,
K.
Boyer
, and
S.
Sarkar
, eds.,
Springer
, New York, NY, pp.
121
138
.
36.
Tversky
,
T.
,
Geisler
,
W. S.
, and
Perry
,
J. S.
,
2004
, “
Contour Grouping: Closure Effects are Explained by Good Continuation and Proximity
,”
Vision Res.
,
44
(
24
), pp.
2769
2777
.
37.
Desolneux
,
A.
,
Moisan
,
L.
, and
Morel
,
J.-M.
,
2004
, “
Gestalt Theory and Computer Vision
,”
Seeing, Thinking and Knowing
, A. Carsetti, ed.,
Springer
, Dordrecht, Netherlands, pp.
71
101
.
38.
Albert
,
M. K.
,
1993
, “
Parallelism and the Perception of Illusory Contours
,”
Perception
,
22
(
5
), pp.
589
595
.
39.
Onwubiko
,
C. O.
,
1989
,
Foundations of Computer-Aided Design
,
West Publishing Company
, St. Paul, MN.
40.
Sedivy
,
J.
, and
Hubalovsky
,
S.
,
2012
, “
Mathematical Foundations and Principles in Practice of Computer Aided Design Simulation
,”
Int. J. Math. Comput. Simul.
,
6
(
1
), pp.
230
237
.
41.
Manski
,
C. F.
,
2001
, “
Daniel McFadden and the Econometric Analysis of Discrete Choice
,”
Scand. J. Econ.
,
103
(2), pp.
217
229
.
42.
McFadden
,
D.
,
1974
, “
Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior
,”
Frontiers in Econometrics
,
P.
Zarembka
, ed.,
Academic Press
, New York, NY, pp.
105
142
.
43.
Rao
,
V. R.
,
2014
,
Applied Conjoint Analysis
,
Springer
, Berlin, Germany.
44.
Ben-Akiva
,
M.
,
McFadden
,
D.
, and
Train
,
K.
,
2015
, “
Foundations of Stated Preference Elicitation
,” working paper, Department of Economics, University of California, Berkeley, http://eml.berkeley.edu/~train/foundations.pdf
45.
Orsborn
,
S.
, and
Cagan
,
J.
,
2009
, “
Multiagent Shape Grammar Implementation: Automatically Generating Form Concepts According to a Preference Function
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
131
(
12
), p.
121007
.
46.
Reid
,
T. N.
,
MacDonald
,
E. F.
, and
Du
,
P.
,
2013
, “
Impact of Product Design Representation on Customer Judgment
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
135
(
9
), p.
091008
.
47.
DiSalvo
,
C.
, and
Gemperle
,
F.
,
2003
, “
From Seduction to Fulfillment: The Use of Anthropomorphic Form in Design
,”
2003 International Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces
, ACM, Pittsburgh, PA, pp.
67
72
.
48.
Cronin
,
C.
,
2009
, “
Genius in a Bottle: Perfume, Copyright, and Human Perception
,” 56 J. Copyright Soc'y 427, 2009; USC Law Legal Studies Paper No. 14-33. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2459258
49.
Lindsey
,
B.
,
2009
, “
Bottle Typing (Typology) and Diagnostic Shapes
,” Historic Glass Bottle Identification and Information, http://www.sha.org/bottle/typing.htm
50.
Kelly
,
J. C.
,
Maheut
,
P.
,
Petiot
,
J. F.
, and
Papalambros
,
P. Y.
,
2011
, “
Incorporating User Shape Preference in Engineering Design Optimisation
,”
J. Eng. Des.
,
22
(
9
), pp.
627
650
.
51.
Horton
,
J. J.
, and
Chilton
,
L. B.
,
2010
, “
The Labor Economics of Paid Crowdsourcing
,”
11th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce
, ACM, Cambridge, MA, pp.
209
218
.
52.
Train
,
K.
, and
Sonnier
,
G.
,
2005
, “
Mixed Logit With Bounded Distributions of Correlated Partworths
,”
Applications of Simulation Methods in Environmental and Resource Economics
, Vol.
6
,
R.
Scarpa
, and
A.
Alberini
, eds.,
Springer
, Dordrecht, Netherlands, pp.
117
134
.
53.
Train
,
K. E.
,
2006
, “
MATLAB Code to Estimate a Mixed Logit Model With Hierarchical Bayes Procedures
,” Department of Economics, University of California, Berkeley, Available at http://eml.berkeley.edu/Software/abstracts/train1006mxlhb.html
54.
Reid
,
T. N.
,
Frischknecht
,
B. D.
, and
Papalambros
,
P. Y.
,
2012
, “
Perceptual Attributes in Product Design: Fuel Economy and Silhouette-Based Perceived Environmental Friendliness Tradeoffs in Automotive Vehicle Design
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
134
(
4
), p.
041006
.
You do not currently have access to this content.