This paper presents a method based on multiattribute utility theory (MAUT) that facilitates the selection of a product line. The method helps select the subset of products to manufacture based on criteria at the: (1) product level (e.g., manufacturing cost, profit); and (2) product family level (e.g., commonality, component reuse, variety, market coverage). An example involving a family of staplers is used to demonstrate the method and to provide a well-documented engineering application of MAUT in product family design.
Issue Section:
Technical Briefs
1.
Olewnik
, A.
, and Lewis
, K.
, 2006, “A Decision Support Framework for Flexible System Design
,” J. Eng. Design
0954-4828, 17
(1
), pp. 75
–97
.2.
Dai
, Z.
, and Scott
, M. J.
, 2006, “Effective Product Family Design Using Preference Aggregation
,” ASME J. Mech. Des.
1050-0472, 128
(4
), pp. 659
–667
.3.
Fellini
, R.
, Kokkolaras
, M.
, Papalambros
, P.
, and Perez-Duarte
, A.
, 2005, “Platform Selection Under Performance Loss Constraints in Optimal Design of Product Families
,” ASME J. Mech. Des.
1050-0472, 127
(4
), pp. 524
–535
.4.
Keeney
, R. L.
, and Raiffa
, H.
, 1993, Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs
, Cambridge University Press
, Cambridge, UK.5.
Keefer
, D. L.
, and Kirkwood
, C. W.
, 1978, “A Multiobjective Decision Analysis: Budget Planning for Product Engineering
,” Oper. Res. Q.
0030-3623, 29
(5
), pp. 435
–442
.6.
Gurnani
, A. P.
, and Lewis
, K.
, 2005, “Robust Multiattribute Decision Making Under Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Design
,” Eng. Optimiz.
0305-215X, 37
(8
), pp. 813
–830
.7.
Soelberg
, P. O.
, 1967, “Unprogrammed Decision Making
,” Industrial Management Review
, 8
(1
), pp. 19
–29
.8.
Seepersad
, C. C.
, Mistree
, F.
, and Allen
, J. K.
, 2002, Proceedings of the 2002 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Advances in Design Automation
, Montreal, Canada, ASME Paper No. DETC2002/DAC-34096.9.
Thevenot
, H. J.
, 2006, “A Method For Product Family Redesign Based on Component Commonality Analysis
,” Ph.D., The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.10.
Thevenot
, H. J.
, and Simpson
, T. W.
, 2006, “A Comprehensive Metric for Evaluating Component Commonality in a Product Family
,” Proceedings ASME 2006 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
, Philadelphia
, PA, ASME, Paper No. DETC2006-DAC99268.11.
Thevenot
, H. J.
, and Simpson
, T. W.
, 2006, “Commonality Indices for Product Family Design: A Detailed Comparison
,” J. Eng. Design
0954-4828, 17
(2
), pp. 99
–119
.12.
Kota
, S.
, Sethuraman
, K.
, and Miller
, R.
, 2000, A Metric for Evaluating Design Commonality in Product Families
,” ASME J. Mech. Des.
1050-0472, 122
(4
), pp. 403
–410
.13.
Kirkwood
, C. W.
, 1997, Strategic Decision Making: Multiobjective Decision Analysis with Spreadsheets
, Wadsworth Publishing Company
, Belmont
, CA.14.
Pratt
, J. W.
, 1964, “Risk Aversion in the Small and in the Large
,” Econometrica
0012-9682, 32
, pp. 122
–136
.15.
Porter
, M. E.
, 1985, Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance
, The Free Press
, New York, NY.16.
Desai
, P.
, Kekre
, S.
, Radhakrishnan
, S.
, and Srinivasan
, K.
, 2001, “Product Differentiation and Commonality in Design: Balancing Revenue and Cost Drivers
,” Manage. Sci.
0025-1909, 47
(1
), pp. 37
–51
.Copyright © 2007
by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
You do not currently have access to this content.