For any undercut region of a plastic molded part, a side core has to be designed to form the complex geometry while avoiding the interference between the injection mold and the plastic molded part (molding). Viewing undercuts as features in the context of injection mold design, this paper presents a new method to recognize both isolated and interacting undercut features extracted from a mold cavity or core. With the introduction of the face property and the EAFEG representation scheme, an undercut feature can be precisely defined by an undercut subgraph. Unlike conventional graph-based methods, which recognize features by graph matching, the proposed algorithm recognizes undercut features by searching the cut-sets of subgraphs. After recognizing undercut features, a Boolean operation is used to generate a side core for each undercut. Rules to eliminate the side core intersection are also presented for implementation.

1.
Shin
,
K. H.
, and
Lee
,
K. W.
,
1993
, “
Design of Side Cores of Injections Moulds from Automatic Detection of Interference Faces
,”
Journal of Design and Manufacturing
,
3
, pp.
225
236
.
2.
Zhang, Y. F., Lee, K. S., Wang, Y., Fuh, J. Y. H., and Nee, A. Y. C., 1997, “Automatic Side Core Creation for Designing Slider/Lifter of Injection Moulds,” Proc. of CIRP International Conference and Exhibition on Design and Production of Dies and Molds, Istanbul, Turkey, pp. 33–38.
3.
Shah
,
J. J.
,
1991
, “
Assessment of Feature Technology
,”
Comput.-Aided Des.
,
23
(
5
), pp.
331
343
.
4.
Wu
,
M. C.
, and
Liu
,
C. R.
,
1996
, “
Analysis on Machined Feature Recognition Techniques Based on B-rep
,”
Comput.-Aided Des.
,
28
(
8
), pp.
603
616
.
5.
Chen
,
L. L.
,
Chou
,
S. Y.
, and
Woo
,
T. C.
,
1993
, “
Parting Directions for Mold and Die design
,”
Comput.-Aided Des.
,
25
(
12
), pp.
762
768
.
6.
Weinstein
,
M.
, and
Manoocheri
,
S.
,
1996
, “
Geometric Influence of Molded Part on the Draw Direction Range and Parting Line Location
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
118
, pp.
29
39
.
7.
Rosen
,
D. W.
,
1994
, “
Towards Automated Construction of Moulds and Dies
,”
ASME Computers in Engineering
,
1
, pp.
317
323
.
8.
Fu
,
M. W.
,
Fuh
,
J. Y. H.
, and
Nee
,
A. Y. C.
,
1999
, “
Undercut Feature Recognition in an Injection Mould Design System
,”
Comput.-Aided Des.
,
31
(
12
), pp.
777
790
.
9.
Farin, G., 1990, Curves and Surfaces for Computer Aided Geometric Design, 2nd edition, Academic Press, Inc, Boston.
10.
Deo, N., 1974, Graph Theory with Applications to Engineering and Computer Science, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
11.
Vandenbrande
,
J. H.
, and
Requicha
,
A. A. G.
,
1993
, “
Spatial Reasoning for the Automatic Recognition of Machinable Features in Solid Models
,”
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.
,
15
(
12
), pp.
1269
1285
.
12.
Joshi
,
S.
, and
Chang
,
T. C.
,
1988
, “
Graph-Based Heuristics for Recognition of Machined Features from a 3D Solid Model
,”
Comput.-Aided Des.
,
20
(
2
), pp.
58
66
.
13.
Chen
,
L. L.
, and
Woo
,
T. C.
,
1992
, “
Computational Geometry on the Sphere With Application to Automated Machining
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
114
, pp.
288
295
.
14.
Unigraphics, 1997, UG/Open API Reference, Volume 1 to Volume 4, Unigraphics Solution Co., Maryland Heights, MO.
You do not currently have access to this content.