Full three-dimensional (3D) computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations are carried out using ANSYS cfx to obtain the detailed flow field and to estimate the rotordynamic coefficients of a labyrinth seal for various inlet swirl ratios. Flow fields in the labyrinth seal with the eccentricity of the rotor are observed in detail and the detailed mechanisms that increase the destabilizing forces at high inlet swirl ratios are discussed based on the fluid governing equations associated with the flow fields. By evaluating the contributions from each term of the governing equation to cross-coupled force, it is found that circumferential velocity and circumferential distribution of axial mass flow rate play key roles in generating cross-coupled forces. In the case that circumferential velocity is high and decreases along the axial direction, all contributions from each term are positive cross-coupled force. On the other hand, in the case that circumferential velocity is low and increases along the axial direction, one contribution is positive but the other is negative. Therefore, cross-coupled force can be negative in the local chamber depending on the balance even if circumferential velocity is positive. CFD predictions of cross-coupled stiffness coefficients and direct damping coefficients show better agreement with experimental results than a bulk flow model does by considering the force on the rotor in the inlet region. Cross-coupled stiffness coefficients derived from the force on the rotor in the seal section agree well with those of the bulk flow model.

References

1.
Iwatsubo
,
T.
,
1980
, “
Evaluation of Instability Forces of Labyrinth Seals in Turbines or Compressors
,”
Workshop on Rotordynamic Instability Problems in High Performance Turbomachinery
, College Station, TX, May 12–14, Report No.
NASA CP-2133.
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19800021214
2.
Childs
,
D. W.
, and
Scharrer
,
J. K.
,
1986
, “
Iwatsubo Based Solution for Labyrinth Seals: Comparison to Experimental Results
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbine Power
,
108
(
2
), pp.
325
331
.
3.
Scharrer
,
J.
,
1987
, “Theory Versus Experiment for the Rotordynamic Coefficients of Labyrinth Gas Seals—Part I: A Two Control Volume Model,”
ASME J. Vib., Acoust., Stress, and Reliab.
,
110
(3), pp. 270–280.
4.
Childs
,
D. W.
, and
Scharrer
,
J. K.
,
1987
, “Theory Versus Experiment for the Rotordynamic Coefficients of Labyrinth Gas Seals—Part II: A Comparison to Experiment,”
ASME J. Vib., Acoust., Stress, and Reliab.
,
110
(3), pp. 281–287.
5.
Kirk
,
R. G.
,
1988
, “
Evaluation of Aerodynamic Instability Mechanisms for Centrifugal Compressors—Part II: Advanced Analysis
,”
J. Vib., Acoust., Stress Reliab.
,
110
(
2
), pp.
207
212
.
6.
Kirk
,
R. G.
,
1990
, “
A Method for Calculating Labyrinth Seal Inlet Swirl Velocity
,”
ASME J. Vib. Acoust.
,
112
(
3
), pp.
380
383
.
7.
Kirk
,
R. G.
,
Raju
,
K. V. S.
, and
Ramesh
,
K.
,
1999
, “
PC-Based Analysis of Turbomachinery Vibration
,”
Shock Vib. Dig.
,
31
(
6
), pp.
449
454
.
8.
Rhode
,
D. L.
,
Hensel
,
S. J.
, and
Guidry
,
M. J.
,
1992
, “
Labyrinth Seal Rotordynamic Forces Using a Three-Dimensional Navier-Stokes Code
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
114
(
4
), pp.
683
689
.
9.
Rhode
,
D. L.
,
Hensel
,
S. J.
, and
Guidry
,
M. J.
,
1993
, “
Three-Dimensional Computations of Rotordynamic Force Distribution I a Labyrinth Seal
,”
STLE Tribol. Trans.
,
36
(
3
), pp.
461
469
.
10.
Ishii
,
E.
,
Kato
,
C.
,
Kikuchi
,
K.
, and
Ueyama
,
Y.
,
1997
, “
Prediction of Rotordynamic Forces in a Labyrinth Seal Based on Three-Dimensional Turbulent Flow Computation
,”
JSME Int. J. Ser. C
,
40
(
4
), pp.
743
748
.
11.
Kwanka
,
K.
,
Sobotzik
,
J.
, and
Nordman
,
R.
,
2000
, “Dynamic Coefficients of Labyrinth Gas Seals: A Comparison of Experimental Results and Numerical Calculations,”
ASME
Paper No. 2000-GT-403.
12.
Moore
,
J. J.
,
2001
, “Three-Dimensional CFD Rotordynamic Analysis of Gas Labyrinth Seals,”
ASME J. Vib. Acoust.
,
125
(4), pp. 427–433.
13.
Hirano
,
T.
,
Guo
,
Z.
, and
Kirk
,
R. G.
,
2005
, “
Application of Computational Fluid Dynamics Analysis for Rotating Machinery—Part II: Labyrinth Seal Analysis
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines and Power
,
127
(
4
), pp.
820
826
.
14.
Benckert
,
H.
, and
Wachter
,
J.
,
1980
, “Flow Induced Spring Coefficients of Labyrinth Seals for Application in Rotor Dynamics,” Workshop on Rotordynamic Instability Problems in High-Performance Turbomachinery, College Station, TX, May 12–14, Report No.
NASA CP-2133
.https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19800021216
15.
Picardo
,
A.
, and
Childs
,
D. W.
,
2005
, “
Rotordynamic Coefficients for a Tooth-on-Stator Labyrinth Seal at 70 Bar Supply Pressures: Measurements Versus Theory and Comparisons to a Hole-Pattern Stator Seal
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
127
(
4
), pp.
843
855
.
16.
Pugachev
,
A.
, and
Degen
,
H.
, 2012, “CFD-Predicted Rotordynamic Coefficients for a 20-Teeth-on-Stator Labyrinth Seal at High Supply Pressure Conditions,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2012-68381.
17.
Mehta
,
N. J.
, and
Childs
,
D. W.
, 2013, “Measured Comparison of Leakage and Rotordynamic Characteristics for a Slanted-Tooth and a Straight-Tooth Labyrinth Seal,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2013-94035.
18.
Mehta
,
N. J.
,
2012
, “Comparison of a Slanted-Tooth See-Through Labyrinth Seal to a Straight-Tooth See-Through Labyrinth Seal For Rotordynamic Coefficients and Leakage,”
M.Sc. thesis
, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.http://oaktrust.library.tamu.edu/handle/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2012-05-10825
19.
Moore
,
J. J.
, and
Palazzolo
,
A. B.
,
1999
, “
CFD Comparison to 3D Laser Anemometer and Rotordynamic Force Measurements for Grooved Liquid Annular Seals
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
121
(
2
), pp.
307
314
.
20.
Williams
,
B. P.
, and
Flack
,
R. D.
,
1998
, “
Calculation of Rotor Dynamic Coefficients for Labyrinth Seal
,”
Int. J. Rotating Mach.
,
4
(
4
), pp.
257
269
.
21.
Williams
,
B. P.
,
1992
, “The Calculation of Rotordynamic Coefficients for Labyrinth Seals,”
M.S. thesis
, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/ijrm/1998/540124.pdf
You do not currently have access to this content.