Gas turbine off design performance prediction is strictly dependent on the accuracy of compressor and turbine map characteristics. Experimental data regarding component maps are very difficult to find in literature, since it is undisclosed proprietary information of the engine manufacturers. To overcome this limitation, gas turbine engineers use available generic component maps and modify them to reach the maximum adherence with the experimental measures. Different scaling and adaptation techniques have been employed to this aim; these methodologies are usually based upon analytic regression models which minimize the deviation from experimental data. However, since these models are built mainly for a specific compressor or turbine map, their generalization is quite difficult: in fact, regression is highly shape-dependent and, therefore, requires a different model for each different specific component. This paper proposes a solution to the problem stated above: a new method for map adaptation is investigated to improve steady-state off design prediction accuracy of a generic gas turbine component. The methodology does not employ analytical regression models; its main principle relies in performing map modifications in an appropriate neighborhood of the multiple experimental points used for the adaptation. When using gas turbine simulation codes, component maps are usually stored in a data matrix and are ordered in a format suitable for 2D interpolation. A perturbation of the values contained in the matrix results in component map morphing. An optimization algorithm varies the perturbation intensity vector in order to minimize the deviation between experimental and predicted points. The adaptation method is integrated inside TSHAFT, the gas turbine prediction code developed at the University of Padova. The assessment of this methodology will be exposed by illustrating a case study carried out upon a turbojet engine.

References

1.
Li
,
Y. G.
,
Abdul Ghafir
,
M. F.
,
Wang
,
L.
,
Singh
,
R.
,
Huang
,
K.
,
Feng
,
X.
, and
Zhang
,
W.
,
2012
, “
Improved Multiple Point Non-Linear Genetic Algorithm Based Performance Adaptation Using Least Square Method
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
134
(3), p.
031701
.10.1115/1.4004395
2.
Stamatis
,
A.
,
Mathioudakis
,
K.
, and
Papailiou
,
K. D.
,
1990
, “
Adaptive Simulation of Gas Turbine Performance
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
112
(
2
), pp.
168
175
.10.1115/1.2906157
3.
Lambiris
,
B.
,
Mathioudakis
,
K.
, and
Papailiou
,
K. D.
,
1994
, “
Adaptive Modeling of Jet Engine Performance With Application to Condition Monitoring
,”
J. Propul. Power
,
10
(
6
), pp.
890
896
.10.2514/3.23828
4.
Li
,
Y. G.
,
Pilidis
,
P.
, and
Newby
,
M.
,
2005
, “
An Adaptation Approach for Gas Turbine Design-Point Performance Simulation
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
128
(4), pp.
789
795
.10.1115/1.2136369
5.
Li
,
Y. G.
, and
Pilidis
,
P.
,
2010
, “
GA-Based Design-Point Performance Adaptation and Its Comparison With ICM-Based Approach
,”
Appl. Energy
,
87
(1), pp.
340
348
.10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.05.034
6.
Li
,
Y. G.
,
Marinai
,
L.
,
Lo Gatto
,
E.
,
Pachidis
,
V.
, and
Pilidis
,
P.
,
2009
, “
Multiple-Point Adaptive Performance Simulation Tuned to Aeroengine Test-Bed Data
,”
J. Propul. Power
,
25
(
3
), pp.
635
641
.10.2514/1.38823
7.
Li
,
Y. G.
,
Abdul Ghafir
,
M. F.
,
Wang
,
L.
,
Singh
,
R.
,
Huang
,
K.
, and
Feng
,
X.
,
2011
, “
Nonlinear Multiple Points Gas Turbine Off-Design Performance Adaptation Using a Genetic Algorithm
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
133
(7), p.
071701
.10.1115/1.4002620
8.
Kong
,
C.
, and
Ki
,
J.
,
2007
, “
Components Map Generation of Gas Turbine Engine Using Genetic Algorithms and Engine Performance Deck Data
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
129
(2), pp.
312
317
.10.1115/1.2436561
9.
Tsoutsanis
,
E.
,
Li
,
Y. G.
,
Pilidis
,
P.
, and
Newby
,
M.
,
2012
, “
Part-Load Performance of Gas Turbines: Part I—A Novel Compressor Map Generation Approach Suitable for Adaptive Simulation
,”
ASME 2012 Gas Turbine India Conference
,
Mumbai, India
, December 1,
ASME
Paper No. GTINDIA2012-9580. 10.1115/GTINDIA2012-9580
10.
Tsoutsanis
,
E.
,
Li
,
Y. G.
,
Pilidis
,
P.
, and
Newby
,
M.
,
2012
, “
Part-Load Performance of Gas Turbines: Part II—Multi-Point Adaptation With Compressor Map Generation and GA Optimization
,”
Proceedings of the ASME 2012 Gas Turbine India Conference
,
Mumbai, India
, December 1,
ASME
Paper No. GTINDIA2012-9581. 10.1115/GTINDIA2012-9581
11.
Jones
,
G.
,
Pilidis
,
P.
, and
Curnock
,
B.
,
2001
, “
Compressor Characteristics in Gas Turbine Performance Modelling
,”
ASME Turbo Expo 2001
,
New Orleans, LA
, June 4–7, ASME Paper No. 2001-GT-0384.
12.
Kurzke
,
J.
,
1996
, “
How to Get Component Maps for Aircraft Gas Turbine Performance Calculations
,” Birmingham, UK, June 10–13, ASME Paper No. 96-GT-164.
13.
Misté
,
G. A.
, and
Benini
,
E.
,
2012
, “
Improvements in Off-Design Aeroengine Performance Predictions Using Analytic Compressor Map Interpolation
,”
Int. J. Turbo Jet Eng.
,
29
(1), pp.
69
77
.10.1515/tjj-2012-0012
14.
Walsh
,
P. P.
, and
Fletcher
,
P.
,
2004
,
Gas Turbine Performance
,
Blackwell Publishing
,
Oxford, UK
.
15.
Saravanamuttoo
,
H. I. H.
,
1992
, “
Overview on Basis and Use of Performance Prediction Methods
,” Steady and Transient Performance Prediction of Gas Turbine Engines, (AGARD Lecture Series 183), Advisory Group for Aerospace Research & Development, Neuilly sur Seine, France.
16.
Lagarias
,
J. C.
,
Reeds
,
J. A.
,
Wright
,
M. H.
, and
Wright
,
P. E.
,
1998
, “
Convergence Properties of the Nelder-Mead Simplex Method in Low Dimensions
,”
SIAM J. Optim.
,
9
(
1
), pp.
112
147
.
You do not currently have access to this content.