This paper presents a fully reversible blade parametric design methodology. The blades are for application in jet fans that ventilate and provide emergency smoke control in road tunnels. The blade design variables are tip solidity, twist, and camber distribution. The authors base the design methodology on a sensitivity analysis which they derived from a response surface approximation. They construct the latter using a computational analysis of four experimental cases which they generated using an experimental design approach. The sensitivity analysis calculates a rank and a weight for each design variable that affects the jet-fan performance parameters thrust and efficiency, and thus facilitates insight into each variable's relative importance. Finally, the authors present a redesign of an existing reversible jet-fan blade by following the design guidelines which they obtained from the sensitivity analysis. The authors study the aerodynamic characteristics of the redesigned blade and compare it to that of the baseline design configuration. They then manufacture a redesigned blade prototype. Finally, the authors present thrust and power measurements for both the baseline jet fan, and the baseline jet fan when fitted with a redesigned blade.

References

1.
Karki
,
K. C.
, and
Patankar
,
S. V.
,
2000
, “
CFD Model for Jet-Fan Ventilation Systems
,”
Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Aerodynamics and Ventilation of Vehicle Tunnels Principles, Analysis and Design
,
Boston
, November 1–3.
2.
Mutama
,
K. R.
, and
Hall
,
A. E.
,
1996
, “
The Experimental Investigation of Jet-Fan Aerodynamics Using Wind Tunnel Modeling
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
,
118
, pp.
322
328
.10.1115/1.2817380
3.
Giesen
,
B. J. M.
,
Penders
,
S. H. A.
,
Loomans
,
M. G. L. C.
,
Rutten
,
P. G. S.
, and
Hensen
,
J. L. M.
,
2011
, “
Modeling and Simulation of a Jet-Fan for Controlled Airflow in Large Enclosures
,”
Environ. Model. Software
,
26
, pp.
191
200
.10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.07.008
4.
Daneshkhah
,
K.
, and
Ghaly
,
W. S.
,
2007
, “
Aerodynamic Inverse Design for Viscous Flow in Turbomachinery Blading
,”
AIAA J. Propul. Power
,
23
, pp.
814
820
.10.2514/1.27740
5.
Mengistu
,
T.
, and
Ghaly
,
W. S.
,
2006
, “
Aerodynamic Optimization of Turbomachinery Blades Using Evolutionary Methods and ANN-Based Surrogate Models
,”
J. Opt. Eng.
,
9
(
3
), pp.
239
255
.10.1007/s11081-007-9031-1
6.
Mengistu
,
T.
,
Ghaly
,
W. S.
, and
Manour
,
T
,
2007
, “
Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of Turbine Blades Using a Design-Parameter-Based Shape Representation
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2007-28041.10.1115/GT2007-28041
7.
Lian
,
Y.
, and
Liou
,
M.
,
2004
, “
Multi-Objective Optimization Using Coupled Response Surface Model and Evolutionary Algorithm
,” AIAA Paper No. 2004-4323.
8.
Mansour
,
T.
, and
Ghaly
,
W. S.
,
2003
, “
An Implicit Geometric Representation of Turbine Blades Using NURBS
,”
Proceedings of the 11th CFD Conference of the Canadian Society of CFD
,
Vancouver, Canada
, May 28–30, Vol.
1
, pp.
238
243
.
9.
Beachkofski
,
B.
, and
Grandhi
,
R.
,
2002
, “
Improved Distributed Hypercube Sampling
,” AIAA Paper No. 2002-1274.
10.
ANSYS CFX, Commercial Release, Version 12.1, Ansys Inc., Canonsburg, PA.
You do not currently have access to this content.