The efficiency of a cooled turbine stage has been discussed in the literature. All proposed definitions compare the actual power output with an ideal output, which has to be determined; but usually, one of two definitions has been used by turbine designers. In the first, the so-called Hartsel efficiency, the mainstream gas flow, and the various coolant flows to rotor and stator are assumed to expand separately and isentropically to the backpressure. In the second, it is assumed that these flows mix at constant (mainstream) gas pressure before expanding isentropically (sometimes, the rotor coolant flow is ignored in this definition). More recently, it has been suggested that a thermodynamically sounder definition is one in which the gas and coolant flows mix reversibly and adiabatically before isentropic expansion to the backpressure. In the current paper, these three efficiencies are compared, for a typical stage—the first cooled stage of a multistage industrial gas turbine. It is shown that all the efficiencies fall more or less linearly with increase of the fractional (total) coolant flow. It is also shown that the new definition of efficiency gives values considerably lower than the other two efficiencies, which are more widely used at present. Finally, the various irreversibilities associated with the flow through a cooled turbine are calculated. Although all these irreversibilities increase with the fractional coolant flow, it is shown that the “thermal” irreversibility associated with film cooling is higher than the other irreversibilities at large fractional coolant flow.

1.
Young
,
J. B.
, and
Horlock
,
J. H.
, 2006, “
Defining the Efficiency of a Cooled Turbine
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
128
, pp.
658
667
.
2.
Torbidoni
,
L.
, and
Horlock
,
J. H.
, 2006, “
Calculation of the Expansion Through a Cooled Gas Turbine
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
128
, pp.
555
563
.
3.
Hartsel
,
J. E.
, 1972, “
Prediction of Effects of Mass-Transfer Cooling on the Blade-Row Efficiency of Turbine Airfoils
,”
AIAA Tenth Aerospace Sciences Meeting
,
San Diego
, Paper AIAA-72–11.
4.
Kurzke
,
J.
, 2002, “
Performance Modelling Methodology: Efficiency Definitions for Cooled Single and Multistage Turbines
,” ASME Paper No. 2002-GT-30497.
5.
Young
,
J. B.
, and
Wilcock
,
R. C.
, 2002a, “
Modelling the Air-Cooled Gas Turbine—Part 1: General Thermodynamics
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
124
, pp.
207
213
.
6.
Young
,
J. B.
, and
Wilcock
,
R. C.
, 2002b, “
Modelling the Air-Cooled Gas Turbine—Part 2: Coolant Flows and Losses
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
124
, pp.
214
221
.
7.
Wilcock
,
R. C.
,
Young
,
J. B.
, and
Horlock
,
J. H.
, 2005, “
The Effect of Turbine Blade Cooling on the Cycle Efficiency of Gas Turbine Power Plants
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
127
, pp.
109
120
.
8.
Horlock
,
J. H.
,
Watson
,
D. T.
, and
Jones
,
T. V.
, 2001, “
Limitations on Gas Turbine Performance Imposed by Large Turbine Cooling Flows
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
123
, pp.
487
494
.
9.
Timko
,
L. P.
, 1980, “
Energy Efficient Engine: High Pressure Turbine Component Test Perfomance Report
,” NASA Report No. CR-168289.
You do not currently have access to this content.