Abstract

The effect of tires on the overall aerodynamic drag in a car–tire assembly has been studied and deemed considerable from past studies. It has been shown that it is important to understand how the vehicle body and the tires influence the flow structures generated. Previous studies focused on the tire attributes that have an impact on the aerodynamic performance of the vehicle. These tire attributes, however, have not been studied extensively. This paper studies the impact that specific tire attributes have on the overall aerodynamic drag on the vehicle through a systematic sensitivity study. In this study, the DrivAer model is used due to the extensive research that has been done on the model. A baseline computational fluid dynamics model of the tire–vehicle assembly of the DrivAer model is simulated using ansysfluent in the open road domain to understand the flow structures around the body of the vehicle. Simulations are done on the fastback configuration of the DrivAer model with a smooth underbody. Coefficient of drag and coefficient of pressure results from the simulation are validated from experimental data. Data from the simulations and design of experiments are used to quantitatively compare the drag contribution of different parameters of the tire. The sensitivity analysis of the tire–vehicle assembly model performed gives a better insight into the modeling techniques that can be used on a car–tire assembly, as well as the impact of the parameters that could be selected for future tire model optimization.

References

1.
Hobeika
,
T.
, and
Sebben
,
S.
,
2018
, “
Tyre Pattern Features and Their Effects on Passenger Vehicle Drag
,”
SAE Int. J. Passenger Cars - Mech. Syst.
,
11
(
5
), pp.
401
413
.10.4271/2018-01-0710
2.
Heft
,
A. I.
,
Indinger
,
T.
, and
Adams
,
N. A.
,
2012
, “
Introduction of a New Realistic Generic Car Model for Aerodynamic Investigations
,”
SAE
Paper No. 2012-01-0168.10.4271/2012-01-0168
3.
Peters
,
B. C.
,
Uddin
,
M.
,
Bain
,
J.
,
Curley
,
A.
, and
Henry
,
M.
,
2015
, “
Simulating DrivAer With Structured Finite Difference Overset Grids
,”
SAE
Paper No. 2015-01-1536.10.4271/2015-01-1536
4.
Ashton
,
N.
, and
Revell
,
A.
,
2015
, “
Comparison of RANS and DES Methods for the DrivAer Automotive Body
,”
SAE
Paper No. 2015-01-1538.10.4271/2015-01-1538
5.
Ashton
,
N.
,
West
,
A.
,
Lardeau
,
S.
, and
Revell
,
A.
,
2016
, “
Assessment of RANS and DES Methods for Realistic Automotive Models
,”
Comput. Fluids
,
128
, pp.
1
15
.10.1016/j.compfluid.2016.01.008
6.
Soares
,
R. F.
, and
de Souza
,
F. J.
,
2015
, “
Influence of CFD Setup and Brief Analysis of Flow Over a 3D Realistic Car Model
,”
SAE
Paper No. 2015-36-0513.10.4271/2015-36-0513
7.
Kurachi
,
S.
,
Kawamata
,
H.
,
Hirose
,
K.
,
Suzuki
,
S.
, and
Oshima
,
M.
,
2020
, “
Aerodynamic Sensitivity Analysis of Tire Shape Factors
,”
SAE
Paper No. 2020-01-0669.10.4271/2020-01-0669
8.
Collin
,
C.
,
Mack
,
S.
,
Indinger
,
T.
, and
Mueller
,
J.
,
2016
, “
A Numerical and Experimental Evaluation of Open Jet Wind Tunnel Interferences Using the DrivAer Reference Model
,”
SAE Int. J. Passenger Cars - Mech. Syst.
,
9
(
2
), pp.
657
679
.10.4271/2016-01-1597
9.
Mercker
,
E.
,
Wickern
,
G.
, and
Weidemann
,
J.
,
1997
, “
Contemplation of Nozzle Blockage in Open Jet Wind-Tunnels in View of Different ‘Q’ Determination Techniques
,”
SAE
Paper No. 970136.10.4271/970136
10.
Young
,
A.
, and
Squire
,
H.
,
1945
, “
Blockage Correction in a Closed Rectangular Tunnel
,” Arc, R.&M., London, UK, Report No.
1984
.https://reports.aerade.cranfield.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1826.2/1449/arc-rm-1984.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
11.
Soares
,
R. F.
,
Garry
,
K. P.
, and
Holt
,
J.
,
2017
, “
Comparison of the Far-Field Aerodynamic Wake Development for Three DrivAer Model Configurations Using a Cost-Effective Rans Simulation
,”
SAE
Paper No. 2017-01-1514.10.4271/2017-01-1514
12.
Wittmeier
,
F.
, and
Kuthada
,
T.
,
2015
, “
Open Grille DrivAer Model—First Results
,”
SAE Int. J. Passenger Cars - Mech. Syst.
,
8
(
1
), pp.
252
260
.10.4271/2015-01-1553
13.
John
,
M.
,
Buga
,
S.-D.
,
Monti
,
I.
,
Kuthada
,
T.
,
Wittmeier
,
F.
,
Gray
,
M.
, and
Laurent
,
V.
,
2018
, “
Experimental and Numerical Study of the DrivAer Model Aerodynamics
,”
SAE
Paper No. 2018-01-0741.10.4271/2018-01-0741
14.
Wieser
,
D.
,
Schmidt
,
H.-J.
,
Stefan
,
M.
,
Strangfeld
,
C.
,
Nayeri
,
C.
, and
Paschereit
,
C.
,
2014
, “
Experimental Comparison of the Aerodynamic Behavior of Fastback and Notchback DrivAer Models
,”
SAE Int. J. Passenger Cars - Mech. Syst.
,
7
(
2
), pp.
682
691
.10.4271/2014-01-0613
15.
Mario
,
R.
,
Park
,
J.
, and
You
,
D.
,
2019
, “
Large-Eddy Simulation of Turbulent Flow Over the DrivAer Fastback Vehicle Model
,”
J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn.
,
186
, pp.
123
138
.10.1016/j.jweia.2019.01.003
16.
Ekman
,
P.
,
Wieser
,
D.
,
Virdung
,
T.
, and
Karlsson
,
M.
,
2020
, “
Assessment of Hybrid RANS-LES Methods for Accurate Automotive Aerodynamic Simulations
,”
J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn.
,
206
, p.
104301
.10.1016/j.jweia.2020.104301
17.
Fu
,
G.
, and
Untaroiu
,
A.
,
2020
, “
Effects of Tire Attributes on Aerodynamic Performance
,”
ASME
Paper No. IMECE2020-24615.10.1115/IMECE2020-24615
18.
Fu
,
G.
, and
Untaroiu
,
A.
,
2021
, “
Investigation of Tire Rotating Modeling Techniques Using Computational Fluid Dynamics
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
,
143
(
11
), p.
111206
.10.1115/1.4051311
You do not currently have access to this content.