Cracking and delamination at the interfaces of different materials in plastic IC packages is a well-known failure mechanism. The investigation of local stress behavior, including characterization of stress singularities, is an important problem in predicting and preventing crack initiation and propagation. In this study, a three-dimensional finite element procedure is used to compute the strength of stress singularities at various three-dimensional corners in a typical Flip-Chip assembled Chip-on-Board (FCOB) package. It is found that the stress singularities at the three-dimensional corners are always more severe than those at the corresponding two-dimensional edges, which suggests that they are more likely to be the potential delamination sites. Furthermore, it is demonstrated that the stress singularity at the upper silicon die/epoxy fillet edge can be completely eliminated by an appropriate choice in geometry. A weak stress singularity at the FR4 board/epoxy edge is shown to exist, with a stronger singularity located at the internal die/epoxy corner. The influence of the epoxy contact angle and the FR4 glass fiber orientation on stress state is also investigated. A general result is that the strength of the stress singularity increases with increased epoxy contact angle. In addition, it is shown that the stress singularity effect can be minimized by choosing an appropriate orientation between the glass fiber in the FR4 board and the silicon die. Based on these results, several guidelines for minimizing edge stresses in IC packages are presented. [S1043-7398(00)00904-X]

1.
Tummala, R. R., Rymaszewski, E. J., and Klopfenstein, A. G., eds., 1997, Microelectronics Packaging Handbook, Chapman & Hall, New York.
2.
Hattori
,
T.
,
Sakata
,
S.
, and
Murakami
,
G.
,
1989
, “
A stress singularity parameter approach for evaluating the interfacial reliability of plastic encapsulated lsi devices
,”
ASME J. Electron. Packag.
,
111
, pp.
243
248
.
3.
Gradin
,
P. A.
,
1982
, “
A fracture criterion for edge-bonded bimaterial bodies
,”
J. Compos. Mater.
,
16
, pp.
448
456
.
4.
Groth
,
H. L.
,
1988
, “
Stress singularities and fracture at interface corners in bonded joints
,”
Int. J. Adhesion Adhesives
,
8
, pp.
107
113
.
5.
Reedy
, Jr.,
E. D.
, and
Guess
,
T. R.
,
1993
, “
Comparison of butt tensile strength data with interface corner stress intensity factor prediction
,”
Int. J. Solids Struct.
,
30
, No.
21
, pp.
2929
2936
.
6.
Yamada, Y. and Okumura, H., 1983, “Analysis of local stress in composite materials by the 3d finite element,” Kawata, K., and Akasaka, T., eds., Proc. of the Japan-U.S. Conference, 1981, pp. 55–64.
7.
Lehoucq, R. B., Sorensen, D. C., and Yang, C. 1997, ARPACK Users Guide: Solution of Large Scale Eigenvalue Problems by Implicitly Restarted Arnoldi Methods, http://www.caam.rice.edu/software/ARPACK/.
8.
Palmer, C. I., and Leigh, C. W., eds., 1925, Plane and Sperical Trigonometry, 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
You do not currently have access to this content.