The design of more sustainable products can be best accomplished in a tradeoff-based design process that methodically handles conflicting objectives. Such conflicts are often seen between, environmental impact, cost, and product performance. To support such a process, this paper proposes the development of an environment where sustainability considerations are explicitly introduced early into the design process. This explicitness is provided by integrating the requirements information of sustainability standards and regulations directly into the design process. The emergence of the semantic web provides an interoperable environment in which the context and meaning of knowledge about the relationships among various domains can be shared. This work presents an ontological framework designed to represent both the objectives that pertain to sustainable design and the applicable sustainability standards and regulations. This integrated approach not only can ease the adoption of the standards and regulations during a design process but can also influence a design toward sustainability considerations. The usefulness of this model integration is demonstrated by an illustrative brake disk rotor and pads case study. The results show that both the standards and criteria may be considered at early design stages by using this methodology. Furthermore, it can be used to capture, reveal, and propagate the design intent transparently to all design participants.

References

1.
Ramani
,
K.
,
Ramanujan
,
D.
,
Bernstein
,
W. Z.
,
Zhao
,
F.
,
Sutherland
,
J.
,
Handwerker
,
C.
,
Choi
,
J. K.
,
Kim
,
H.
, and
Thurston
,
D.
,
2010
, “
Integrated Sustainable Life Cycle Design: A Review
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
132
(
9
), p.
091004
.10.1115/1.4002308
2.
Brown
,
A. S.
,
2009
, “
Conflict on the Green
,”
Mech. Eng.
,
131
(
3
), pp.
42
45
.
3.
Eddy
,
D. C.
,
Krishnamurty
,
S.
,
Grosse
, I
. R.
,
Wileden
,
J. C.
, and
Lewis
,
K. E.
,
2012
, “
A Normative Decision Analysis Method for the Sustainability-Based Design of Products
,”
J. Eng. Des.
,
8
, pp.
1
21
.10.1080/09544828.2012.745931
4.
Schwarz
,
J.
,
Beloff
,
B.
, and
Beaver
,
E.
,
2002
, “
Environmental Protection—Use Sustainability Metrics to Guide Decision-Making—Sustainability Provides a Framework for Integrating Environmental, Social and Economic Interests Into Effective Business Strategies
,”
Chem. Eng. Prog.
,
98
(
7
), pp.
58
63
.
5.
Hermann
,
B. G.
,
Kroeze
,
C.
, and
Jawjit
,
W.
,
2007
, “
Assessing Environmental Performance by Combining Life Cycle Assessment, Multi-Criteria Analysis and Environmental Performance Indicators
,”
J. Cleaner Prod.
,
15
(
18
), pp.
1787
1796
.10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.04.004
6.
Tanzil
,
D.
, and
Beloff
,
B. R.
,
2006
, “
Assessing Impacts: Overview on Sustainability Indicators and Metrics
,”
Environ. Qual. Manage.
,
15
(
4
), pp.
41
56
.10.1002/tqem.20101
7.
Sustainable Standards Guide
,
2011
,
website
, http://spi.ncms.org/standards/
8.
Yang
,
Q. Z.
, and
Song
,
B.
,
2009
, “
Semantic Knowledge Management to Support Sustainable Product Design
,”
International Association of Computer Science and Information Technology-Spring Conference, IACSITSC'09, IEEE
, pp.
419
423
.
9.
Rachuri
,
S.
,
Sriram
,
R.
,
Narayanan
,
A.
,
Sarkar
,
P.
,
Lee
,
J.
,
Lyons
,
K.
, and
Kemmerer
,
S.
,
2010
, “
Sustainable Manufacturing: Metrics, Standards, and Infrastructure—NIST Workshop Report
,” National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, MD, NIST Interagency/Internal report (NISTIR) 7683.
10.
Narayanan
,
A.
,
Lee
,
J.
,
Witherell
,
P.
,
Sarkar
,
P.
, and
Rachuri
,
S.
,
2011
, “
An Information Modeling Methodology for Sustainability Standards
,” ASME 2011 IDETC/CIE.
11.
D’Alessio
,
A. E.
,
Witherell
,
P.
, and
Rachuri
,
S.
,
2012
, “
Modeling Gaps and Overlaps of Sustainability Standards
,”
Leveraging Technol. Sustainable World
, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, pp.
443
448
.10.1007/978-3-642-29069-5
12.
Chandrasegaran
,
S. K.
,
Ramani
,
K.
,
Sriram
,
R. D.
,
Horvath
, I
.
,
Bernard
,
A.
,
Harik
,
R. F.
, and
Gao
,
W.
,
2013
, “
The Evolution, Challenges, and Future of Knowledge Representation in Product Design Systems
,”
Comput.-Aided Des.
,
45
(
2
), pp.
204
228
.10.1016/j.cad.2012.08.006
13.
Ahmed
,
S.
,
Kim
,
S.
, and
Wallace
,
K. M.
,
2007
, “
A Methodology for Creating Ontologies for Engineering Design
,”
ASME J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng.
,
7
(
2
), pp.
132
140
.10.1115/1.2720879
14.
Grosse
, I
. R.
,
Milton-Benoit
,
J. M.
, and
Wileden
,
J. C.
,
2005
, “
Ontologies for Supporting Engineering Analysis Models
,”
Artif. Intell. Eng. Des., Analysis Manuf.
,
19
(
1
), pp.
1
18
.10.1017/S0890060405050018
15.
Witherell
,
P.
,
Krishnamurty
,
S.
, and
Grosse
,
I. R.
,
2007
, “
Ontologies for Supporting Engineering Design Optimization
,”
ASME J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng.
,
7
(
2
), pp.
141
150
.10.1115/1.2720882
16.
Li
,
Z.
,
Raskin
, V
.
, and
Ramani
,
K.
,
2008
, “
Developing Engineering Ontology for Information Retrieval
,”
ASME J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng.
,
8(1)
, p.
0110031
.10.1115/1.2830851
17.
Witherell
,
P.
,
Krishnamurty
,
S.
,
Grosse
, I
. R.
, and
Wileden
,
J.
,
2008
, “
FIDOE: A Framework for Intelligent Distributed Ontologies in Engineering
,” ASME 2008 IDETC/CIE.
18.
Rockwell
,
J. A.
,
Witherell
,
P.
,
Fernandes
,
R.
,
Grosse
, I
.
,
Krishnamurty
,
S.
, and
Wileden
,
J.
,
2008
, “
A Web-Based Environment for Documentation and Sharing of Engineering Design Knowledge
,” ASME 2008 IDETC/CIE.
19.
Fernandes
,
R.
,
Grosse
, I
. R.
,
Krishnamurty
,
S.
, and
Wileden
,
J. C.
,
2007
, “
Design and Innovative Methodologies in a Semantic Framework
,” ASME 2007 IDETC/CIE.
21.
Protégé Ontology Editor
,
2012
, http://protege.stanford.edu/
22.
Auer
,
S.
,
Dietzold
,
S.
, and
Riechert
,
T.
,
2006
, “
OntoWiki—A Tool for Social, Semantic Collaboration
,”
Lect. Notes Comput. Sci.
,
4273
, pp.
736
749
.10.1007/11926078
23.
Rockwell
,
J. A.
,
Grosse
, I
. R.
,
Krishnamurty
,
S.
, and
Wileden
,
J. C.
,
2010
, “
A Semantic Information Model for Capturing and Communicating Design Decisions
,”
ASME J. Comput. Inform. Sci. Eng.
,
10
(
3
), p.
031008
.10.1115/1.3462926
24.
Rockwell
,
J. A.
,
2009
, “
A Semantic Framework for Reusing Decision Making Knowledge in Engineering Design
,” ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst, http://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses/329
25.
Hazelrigg
,
G. A.
,
1998
, “
A Framework for Decision-Based Engineering Design
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
120
(
4
), pp.
653
658
.10.1115/1.2829328
26.
Thurston
,
D. L.
,
2001
, “
Real and Misconceived Limitations to Decision Based Design With Utility Analysis
,”
J. Mech. Des.
,
123
(
2
), pp.
176
182
.10.1115/1.1363610
27.
Thurston
,
D. L.
,
2006
, “
Multi-Attribute Utility Analysis of Conflicting Preferences
,”
Decision Making in Engineering Design
,
K.
Lewis
,
W.
Chen
, and
L.
Schmidt
, eds.,
ASME Press
,
New York
, pp.
125
133
.
28.
Gurnani
,
A.
, and
Lewis
,
K.
,
2005
, “
Robust Multiattribute Decision Making Under Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Design
,”
Eng. Optim.
,
37
(
8
), pp.
813
830
.10.1080/03052150500340520
29.
Krishnamurty
,
S.
,
2006
, “
Normative Decision Analysis in Engineering Design
,”
Decision Making in Engineering Design
,
K.
Lewis
,
W.
Chen
, and
L.
Schmidt
, eds.,
ASME Press
,
New York
, pp.
21
33
.
30.
Kulok
,
M.
, and
Lewis
,
K.
,
2007
, “
A Method to Ensure Preference Consistency in Multi-Attribute Selection Decisions
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
129
(
10
) pp.
1002
1011
.10.1115/1.2761921
31.
Thurston
,
D. L.
, and
Srinivasan
,
S.
,
2003
, “
Constrained Optimization for Green Engineering Decision-Making
,”
Environ. Sci. Technol.
,
37
(
23
) pp.
5389
5397
.10.1021/es0344359
33.
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory
, Semantic Web for Earth and Environmental Terminology (SWEET), 2012, http://sweet.jpl.nasa.gov/ontology/
34.
Shigley
,
J. E.
, and
Mischke
,
C. R.
,
1996
,
Standard Handbook of Machine Design
,
McGraw-Hill
,
New York
.
35.
Maleque
,
M. A.
,
Dyuti
,
S.
, and
Rahman
,
M. M.
,
2010
, “
Material Selection Method in Design of Automotive Brake Disc
,”
Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering 2010, Vol. III, WCE 2010
, June 30–July 2, 2010,
London
.
36.
PTC MathCAD
,
2012
, website, http://www.ptc.com/product/mathcad/
37.
38.
Pre SimaPro LCA software
,
2012
, website, http://www.pre-sustainability.com/simapro-lca-software
39.
OSHA
, US Department of Labor, Standards—29 CFR, Standard Number: 1910.1001 App F, 2012, http://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=STANDARDS&p_id=10001
You do not currently have access to this content.