0
research-article

The Effectiveness of the Unit Cell Method in Numerically Modelling and Designing Liquid Cooled Heatsinks

[+] Author and Article Information
Ali Cherom Kheirabadi

2329 West Mall Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4 Canada ali.cherom.k@gmail.com

Dominic Groulx

P.O.Box 15000 Halifax, NS B3H4R2 Canada dominic.groulx@dal.ca

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Heat Transfer Division of ASME for publication in the Journal of Thermal Science and Engineering Applications. Manuscript received July 3, 2018; final manuscript received March 9, 2019; published online xx xx, xxxx. Assoc. Editor: Samuel Sami.

ASME doi:10.1115/1.4043185 History: Received July 03, 2018; Accepted March 10, 2019

Abstract

This study compares two numerical strategies for modeling flow and heat transfer through mini- and micro- channel heatsinks, the unit cell approximation and the full 3D model, with the objective of validating the former approach. Conjugate heat transfer and laminar flow through a 2×2 cm2 copper-water heatsink are modelled using the finite element package COMSOL Multiphysics 5.0. Parametric studies showed that as the heatsink channels widths were reduced, and the total number of channels increased, temperature and pressure predictions from both models converged to similar values. Relative differences as low as 5.4 and 1.6 % were attained at a channel width of 0.25 mm for maximum wall temperature and channel pressure drop, respectively. Due to its computational efficiency and tendency to conservatively overpredict temperatures relative to the full 3D method, the unit cell approximation is recommended for parametric design of heatsinks with channels widths smaller than 0.5 mm. The unit cell method is then used to design an optimal heatsink for server liquid cooling applications. The heatsink has been fabricated and tested experimentally and its thermal performance is compared with numerical predictions. The unit cell method underestimated the maximum wall temperature relative to experimental results by 3.0 to 14.5 % as the flowrate rose from 0.3 to 1.5 gal/min (1.1 to 5.7 L/min).

Copyright © 2019 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Tables

Errata

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In