Research Papers

Optimal Arrangement of Combined-Hole for Improving Film Cooling Effectiveness

[+] Author and Article Information
Chang Han, Zhongran Chi, Hongde Jiang

Department of Thermal Engineering,
Tsinghua University,
Beijing 100084, China

Jing Ren

Department of Thermal Engineering,
Tsinghua University,
Beijing 100084, China
e-mail: renj@tsinghua.edu.cn

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Heat Transfer Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF THERMAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS. Manuscript received July 11, 2013; final manuscript received October 27, 2014; published online November 25, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Srinath V. Ekkad.

J. Thermal Sci. Eng. Appl 7(1), 011010 (Mar 01, 2015) (8 pages) Paper No: TSEA-13-1113; doi: 10.1115/1.4028976 History: Received July 11, 2013; Revised October 27, 2014; Online November 25, 2014

Film cooling technique is widely used to protect the components from being destroyed by hot mainstream in a modern gas turbine. Combining round-holes is a promising way of improving film cooling effectiveness. A DoE (design of experiment) simulation of 396 cases focusing on the arrangement of the combined-hole with double holes for improving film cooling performance is carried out in this work, and the influence of an aerodynamic parameter, blowing ratio is considered as well. The dimensionless lateral distance (PoD) and compound angle (CA) of the double holes have relative influence on the film cooling performance of the combined-hole unit. At the low blowing ratio, increasing symmetrical compound angle (SCA) has positive influence on the area-average effectiveness (EFF) of the combined-hole. But at the intermediate and large blowing ratio, the influence of SCA on the area-average EFF depends on the range of PoD. At the small PoD, the area-average EFF ascends basically along SCA axis. However, the area-average EFF first ascends and subsequently descends along SCA axis at the large PoD. Asymmetrical compound angle (ACA) is also considered to fit the antikidney vortexes produced in the combined-hole film cooling compared to their ideal schematic. However, the film cooling effect of the cases with ACA is not as good as expected. The area-average EFF of ACA cases locates in the level between that of the adjacent SCA cases. The optimal arrangement of combined-hole unit for improving film cooling effectiveness is relative to the local flow field. The optimal arrangement of PoD and CA for improving the combined-hole film cooling performance is different at different blowing ratios.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Goldstein, R. J., 1971, “Film Cooling,” Advances in Heat Transfer, Vol. 7, Academic Press, New York, pp. 321–379.
Walters, D. K., and Leylek, J. H., 2000, “A Detailed Analysis of Film-Cooling Physics—Part 1: Streamwise Injection With Cylindrical Holes,” ASME J. Turbomach., 122(1), pp. 102–112. [CrossRef]
Mayhew, J. E., Baughn, J. W., and Byerley, A. R., 2003, “The Effect of Freestream Turbulence on Film Cooling Adiabatic Effectiveness,” Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 24(5), pp. 669–679. [CrossRef]
Drost, U., and Bolcs, A., 1999, “Investigation of Detailed Film Cooling Effectiveness and Heat Transfer Distributions on a Gas Turbine Airfoil,” ASME J. Turbomach., 121(2), pp. 233–242. [CrossRef]
Zhang, L. J., and Pudupaty, R., 2000, “The Effects of Injection Angle and Hole Exit Shape on Turbine Nozzle Pressure Side Film Cooling,” ASME Paper No. 2000-GT-0247. [CrossRef]
Ahn, J., Schobeiri, M. T., Han, J. C., and Moon, H. K., 2005, “Film cooling Effectiveness on the Leading Edge of a Rotating Film-Cooled Blade Using Pressure Sensitive Paint,” ASME Paper No. GT2005-68344. [CrossRef]
McGovern, K. T., and Leylek, J. H., 2000, “A Detailed Analysis of Film Cooling Physics: Part II Compound-Angle Injection With Cylindrical Holes,” ASME J. Turbomach., 122(1), pp. 113–121. [CrossRef]
Hyams, D. G., and Leylek, J. H., 2000, “A Detailed Analysis of Film Cooling Physics: Part III Streamwise Injection With Shaped Holes,” ASME J. Turbomach., 122(1), pp. 122–132. [CrossRef]
Gritsch, M., Schulz, A., and Wittig, S., 1998, “Adiabatic Wall Effectiveness Measurements of Film Cooling Holes With Expanded Exits,” ASME J. Turbomach., 120(3), pp. 549–556. [CrossRef]
Schmidt, D. L., Sen, B., and Bogard, D. G., 1996, “Film Cooling With Compound Angle Holes: Adiabatic Effectiveness,” ASME J. Turbomach., 118(4), pp. 807–813. [CrossRef]
McGrath, E. L., Leylek, J. H., and Buck, F. A., 2002, “Film Cooling on a Modern HP Turbine Blade Part 4: Compound-Angle Shaped Holes,” ASME Paper No. GT2002-30521. [CrossRef]
Kusterer, K., Bohn, D., Sugimoto, T., and Tanaka, R., 2007, “Double-Jet Ejection of Cooling Air for Improved Film Cooling,” ASME J. Turbomach., 129(4), pp. 809–815. [CrossRef]
Heidmann, J. D., 2008, “A Numerical Study of Anti-Vortex Film Cooling Designs at High Blowing Ratio,” ASME Paper No. GT2008-50845. [CrossRef]
Han, C., Ren, J., and Jiang, H. D., 2012, “Multi-Parameter Influence on Combined-Hole Film Cooling System,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 55(15–16), pp. 4232–4240. [CrossRef]
Kusterer, K., Elyas, A., Bohn, D., Sugimoto, T., Tanaka, R., and Kazari, M., 2010, “Film Cooling Effectiveness Comparison Between Shaped- and Double Jet Film Cooling Holes in a Row Arrangement,” ASME Paper No. GT-2010-22604. [CrossRef]
Li, X. Y., Ren, J., and Jiang, H. D., 2011, “Algebraic Anisotropic Eddy-Viscosity Modeling Application to the Turbulent Film Cooling Flows,” ASME Paper No. GT2011-45791. [CrossRef]
Li, X. Y., Ren, J., and Jiang, H. D., 2012, “Full Field Algebraic Anisotropic Eddy Viscosity Model,” ASME Paper No. GT2012-68667. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Formation of antikidney vortexes [14]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Schematic of basic configuration

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Domain grid of the basic configuration

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Illustration of duct and hole geometry

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Grid-independency verification

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Experimental validation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

The schematic of the average zone

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

PoD influences on the area-average EFF

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Vortex structure on X/D = 3 and M = 1.0

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

SCA influences on the area-average EFF in different conditions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Illustration of asymmetrical vortexes

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Comparison between the results of SCAs and ACAs

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

General evaluation for the film cooling performance of different arrangements of the combined-hole



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In