Research Papers

Numerical Modeling of Two-Phase Flow Distribution Inside Evaporator Headers

[+] Author and Article Information
Miad Yazdani, Abbas A. Alahyari, Hailing Wu, Thomas D. Radcliff

Thermal & Fluid Sciences Department,
United Technologies Research Center,
East Hartford, CT 06108

Manuscript received July 23, 2013; final manuscript received December 11, 2013; published online February 26, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Jovica R. Riznic.

J. Thermal Sci. Eng. Appl 6(3), 031006 (Feb 26, 2014) (7 pages) Paper No: TSEA-13-1120; doi: 10.1115/1.4026309 History: Received July 23, 2013; Revised December 11, 2013

Two-phase flow distribution inside evaporator headers has been a challenging problem for a long time and having a robust predictive tool could substantially alleviate the costs associated with experimentation with different concepts and configurations. The use of a two-phase CFD model to predict flow distribution inside the header and at the discharge ports is demonstrated in this paper. The numerical domain is comprised of an inlet pipe and a distributor tube representing the header with a series of discharge ports. The flow distribution was initially verified using an air–water experiment, where the two-phase modeling approach, mesh requirements, and discretization schemes were defined. Next, the model was used to predict distribution of R134a in a typical heat exchanger distributor. The flow distribution across the discharge ports was provided to a discretized correlation-based heat exchanger model to predict the temperature and quality distribution along the length of the heat exchanger. The resultant temperature distribution is validated against IR imaging results for various operating conditions and header orientations.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Choi, J. M., Payne, V., and Domanski, P. A., 2003, “Effects of Non-Uniform Refrigerant and Air Flow Distribution on Finned-Tube Evaporator Performance,” International Congress Refrigeration.
Bergles, A. E., and Kandlikar, S., 2005, “On the Nature of Critical Heat Flux in Microchannels,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 127, pp. 101–107. [CrossRef]
Hrnjak, P., 2003, “Two Phase Flow Distribution in Headers of Parallel Flow Heat Exchangers and Its Effect on Performance,” 2nd International Conference on Heat Transfer, Fluid Mechanics and Thermodynamics.
Flynn, R. D., and Fogg, D. W., 2006, “Boiling Flow Interaction Between Two Parallel Channels,” Proceedings of 2006 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Chicago, IL.
Vist, S., and Pettersen, J., 2004, Two-Phase Flow Distribution in Compact Heat Exchangers Manifolds, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Watanabe, M., Katsuta, M., and Nagata, K., 1995, “Two-Phase Flow Distribution in Multi-Pass Tube Modeling Serpentine Type Evaporator,” Proceedings of the ASME/JSME Thermal Engineering Conference, 2, pp. 35–42.
Webb, R., and Chung, K., 2005, “Two-Phase Flow Distribution to Tubes or Parallel Flow Aircooled Heat Exchangers,” Technical Report, Department of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering, Penn State University, University Park, PA.
Lee, J., and Lee, S., 2004, “Distribution of Two-Phase Annular Flow at Header-Channel Junctions,” Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci., 28, pp. 217–222. [CrossRef]
Kakac, S., and Bon, B., 2008, “A Review of Two-Phase Flow Dynamic Instabilities in Tube Boiling System,” Int. J Heat Mass Transfer, 51, pp. 399–433. [CrossRef]
Zhang, T., and Wen, J., 2008, “Stability Analysis and Maldistribution Control of Two-Phase Flow in Parallel Evaporating Channels,” Int. J Heat Mass Transfer, 54, pp. 5298–5305. [CrossRef]
Jiao, A., and Baek, S., 2005, “Effects of Distributor Configuration on Flow Maldistribution in Plate-Fin Heat Exchangers,” Heat Transfer Eng., 26, pp. 19–25. [CrossRef]
Ahmad, M., Berthoud, G., and Mercier, P., 2009, “General Characteristics of Two-Phase Flow Distribution in a Compact Heat Exchanger,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 52, pp. 442–450. [CrossRef]
Lemmon, E. W., McLinden, M. O., and Huber, M. L., 2002, “Nist Reference Fluid Theromodynamic and Transport Properties (REFPROP),” NIST Standard Reference Database 23 v7.0, National Institute of Standard and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD.
Carey, V. P., and Mandrusiak, G. D., 1989, “Convective Boiling in Vertical Channels With Different Offset Fin Strip Geometries,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 111, pp. 156–166. [CrossRef]
Manglik, R. M., and Bergles, A. E., 1995, “Heat Transfer and Pressure Drop Correlations for the Rectangular Offset-Strip Fin Compact Heat Exchangers,” Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci., 10, pp. 171–180. [CrossRef]
Baroczy, C. J., 1965, “Correlation of Liquid Fraction in Two-Phase Flow with Application to Liquid Metals,” Chem. Eng. Prog. Symp. Ser., 61, pp. 179–191.
ANSYS, Inc., 2008, “fluent V12.0 User's Guide,” Lebanon, NH.
Youngs, D. L., 1982, “Time-Dependent Multi-Material Flow With Large Fluid Distortion,” Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics, Academic Press, New York.
Berger, M., and Colella, P., 1989, “Local Adaptive Mesh Refinement for Shock Hydrodynamics,” J. Comput. Phys., 82(1), pp. 64–84. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic of discretization and energy balance calculation in the reduced-order correlation-based model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Flow-chart representation of the HX model algorithm

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Schematic of 2D representation of HDRw header used for water/air header experiment (not to scale)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Schematic of the heat-exchanger testing facility

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Evaporator operational space flow of gas and liquid velocities. Filled circles and squares correspond to desired and tested operating conditions.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Schematic of 3D representation of HDRref header used for heat-exchanger experiment (not to scale)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Summary of water flow-rate distribution among the header ports for different configurations

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Comparison between CFD/HX integrated model and IR imaging results for HX with R-134a as working fluid: CFD prediction of port flow-rate distribution (left), HX model prediction of HX temperature distribution (middle), and IR imaging of front face of HX (right). The right axis on the middle figure corresponds to level of discretization in HX model.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Instantaneous liquid distribution inside the HDRref for different port orientations; from top to bottom: 0 deg, 45 deg, and 90 deg

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Normalized capacity calculation from the CFD/HX integrated model and its comparison against experiment's measured capacity for different header configurations



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In