Research Papers

Computational Fluid Dynamics and Optimization of Flow and Heat Transfer in Coiled Tube-in-Tube Heat Exchangers Under Turbulent Flow Conditions

[+] Author and Article Information
Wael I. A. Aly

Department of Refrigeration
and Air Conditioning Technology,
Faculty of Industrial Education,
Helwan University,
Cairo 11282, Egypt
e-mail: aly_wael@helwan.edu.eg,

1Corresponding author.

Manuscript received April 7, 2013; final manuscript received November 25, 2013; published online January 31, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Arun Muley.

J. Thermal Sci. Eng. Appl 6(3), 031001 (Jan 31, 2014) (10 pages) Paper No: TSEA-13-1084; doi: 10.1115/1.4026120 History: Received April 07, 2013; Revised November 25, 2013

The present computational fluid dynamics (CFD) study was performed to investigate the 3D turbulent flow and heat transfer of coiled tube-in-tube heat exchangers (CTITHEs). The realizable k-ε model with enhanced wall treatment was used to simulate the turbulent flow and heat transfer in the heat exchangers. Temperature dependent thermophysical properties of water were used and heat exchangers are analyzed considering conjugate heat transfer from hot fluid in the inner-coiled tube to cold fluid in the annulus region. After simulations, Taguchi method was used for finding the optimum condition for some design parameters in the range of coil diameter from 0.18 to 0.3 m, tube and annulus flow rates from 2 to 4 and 10 to 20 LPM, respectively. Results show that the Gnielinski correlation used extensively for predicting Nusselt number for turbulent flow in ducts can be used to predict Nusselt number for both inner-coiled tube and annular coiled tube using the friction factor correlation for helical tubes of Mishra and Gupta. Contribution ratio obtained by Taguchi method shows that annulus side flow rate, tube side flow rate, coil diameter, and flow configuration are the most important design parameters in coiled tube-in-tube heat exchangers, respectively.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Yao, L. S., and Berger, S. A., 1978, “Flow in Heated Curved Pipes,” J. Fluid Mech, 88, pp. 339–354. [CrossRef]
Vashisth, S., Kumar, V., and Nigam, K. D. P., 2008, “A Review on the Potential Applications of Curved Geometries in Process Industry,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 47, pp. 3291–3337. [CrossRef]
Naphon, P., and Wongwises, S., 2006, “A Review of Flow and Heat Transfer Characteristics in Curved Tubes,” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 10, pp. 463–490. [CrossRef]
Garimella, S., Richards, D. E., and Chirstensen, R. N., 1988, “Experimental Investigation of Heat Transfer in Coiled Annular Ducts,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 110, pp. 329–336. [CrossRef]
Karahalios, G. T., and Panagopoulos, A. A., 1989, “Oscillatory Flow in a Curved Annular Pipe,” Phys. Fluids A, 1, pp. 1104–1111. [CrossRef]
Petrakis, M. A., and Karahalios, G. T., 1996, “Technical Note: Steady Flow in a Curved Pipe With a Coaxial Core,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, 22, pp. 1231–1237. [CrossRef]
Robertson, A. M., and Muller, S. J., 1996, “Flow of Oldroyd-B Fluids in Curved Pipes of Circular and Annular Cross-Section,” Int. J. Non-Linear Mech., 31, pp. l–20. [CrossRef]
Petrakis, M. A., and Karahalios, G. T., 1997, “Exponential-Decaying Flow in a Gently Curved Annular Pipe,” Int. J. Non-Linear Mech., 32, pp. 823–835. [CrossRef]
Xin, R. C., Awwad, A., Dong, Z. F., and Ebadian, M. A., 1997, “An Experimental Study of Single-Phase and Two-Phase Flow Pressure Drop in Annular Helicoidal Pipes,” Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 18, pp. 482–488. [CrossRef]
Petrakis, M. A., and Karahalios, G. T., 1999, “Fluid Flow Behavior in a Curved Annular Conduit,” Int. J. Non-Linear Mech., 34, pp. 13–35. [CrossRef]
Rennie, T. J., and Raghavan, V. G. S., 2005, “Experimental Studies of a Double Pipe Helical Heat Exchanger,” Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci., 29, pp. 919–924. [CrossRef]
Rennie, T. J., and Raghavan, V. G. S., 2006, “Numerical Studies of a Doublepipe Helical Heat Exchanger,” Appl. Therm. Eng., 26, pp. 1266–1273. [CrossRef]
Kumar, V., Saini, S., Sharma, M., and Nigam, K. D. P., 2006, “Pressure Drop and Heat Transfer Study in Tube in Tube Heat Exchanger,” Chem. Eng. Sci., 61, pp. 4403–4416. [CrossRef]
Kumar, V., Faizee, B., Mridha, M., and Nigam, K. D. P., 2008, “Numerical Studies of a Tube in Tube Helically Coiled Heat Exchanger,” Chem. Eng. Process., 47, pp. 2287–2295. [CrossRef]
Mandal, M. M., and Nigam, K. D. P., 2009, “Experimental Study on Pressure Drop and Heat Transfer of Turbulent Flow in Tube in Tube Helical Heat Exchanger,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 48, pp. 9318–9324. [CrossRef]
Wu, S., Chen, S., Xiao, L., and Li, Y., 2011, “Numerical Investigation on Developing Laminar Forced Convective Heat Transfer and Entropy Generation in an Annular Helicoidal Tube,” J. Mech Sci. Technol., 25, pp. 1439–1447. [CrossRef]
Gomaa, A., Aly, W. I. A., Omara, M., and Abdelmagied, M., 2012, “Heat Transfer and Pressure Drop Characteristics in a Double Helically Coiled Tube,” Eng. Res. J., 136, pp. M15–M38.
Shih, T., Liou, W. W., Shabbir, A., Yang, Z., and Zhu, J., 1995, “A New k-ε Eddy Viscosity Model for High Reynolds Number Turbulent Flows,” Comput. Fluids, 24, pp. 227–238. [CrossRef]
Jayakumar, J. S., Mahajani, S. M., Mandal, J. C., Iyer, K., and Vijayan, P. K., 2010, “CFD Analysis of Single-Phase Flows Inside Helically Coiled Tubes,” Comput. Chem. Eng., 34, pp. 430–446. [CrossRef]
Anonymous, 2011, “ansys fluent Theory Guide,” Release 14.0, ANSYS, Inc., Canonsburg.
Ranade, V. V., 2002, Computational Flow Modeling for Chemical Reaction Engineering, Academic Press, London, Chap. 3.
Wolfstein, M., 1969, “The Velocity and Temperature Distribution of One-Dimensional Flow With Turbulence Augmentation and Pressure Gradient,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 12, pp. 301–318. [CrossRef]
Jones, W. P., and Launder, B. E., 1972, “The Prediction of Laminarization With a Two-Equation Model of Turbulence,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 15, pp. 301–314. [CrossRef]
Patankar, S. V., 1980, Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow, Hemisphere, Washington, DC.
Xin, R. C., and Ebadian, M. A., 1997, “The Effects of Prandtl Numbers on Local and Average Convective Heat Transfer Characteristic in Helical Pipes,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 119, pp. 467–473. [CrossRef]
Aly, W. I. A., Inaba, H., Haruki, N., and Horibe, A., 2006, “Drag and Heat Transfer Reduction Phenomena of Drag-Reducing Surfactant Solutions in Straight and Helical Pipes,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 128, pp. 800–810. [CrossRef]
Taguchi, G., 1987, Taguchi Techniques for Quality Engineering, Quality Resources, New York.
Bilen, K., Yapici, J., and Celik, C., 2001, “A Taguchi Approach for Investigation of Heat Transfer From a Surface Equipped With Rectangular Blocks,” Energy Convers. Manage., 42, pp. 951–961. [CrossRef]
Yun, J. Y., and Lee, K. S., 2000, “Infuence of Design Parameters on the Heat Transfer and Flow Friction Characteristics of the Heat Exchanger With Slit,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 43, pp. 2529–2539. [CrossRef]
Gunes, S., Manay, E., Senyigit, E., and Ozceyhan, V., 2011, “A Taguchi Approach for Pptimization of Design Parameters in a Tube With Coiled Wire Inserts,” Appl. Therm. Eng., 31, pp. 2568–2577. [CrossRef]
Jamshidi, N., Farhadi, M., Sedighi, K., and Ganji, D. D., 2012, “Optimization of Design Parameters for Nanofluids Flowing Inside Helical Coils, “Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transfer, 39, pp. 311–317. [CrossRef]
Jamshidi, N., Farhadi, M., Ganji, D. D., and Sedighi, K., 2013, “Experimental Analysis of Heat Transfer Enhancement in Shell and Helical Tube Heat Exchangers.” Appl. Therm. Eng., 51, pp. 644–652. [CrossRef]
Mishra, P., and Gupta, S. N., 1979, “Momentum Transfer in Curved Pipes: Newtonian Fuids,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Des. Dev., 18, pp. 130–137. [CrossRef]
White, C. M., 1932, “Friction Factor and Its Relation to Heat Transfer,” Trans. Inst. Chem. Eng., 18, pp. 66–86.
Ito, H., 1959, “Friction Factors for Turbulent Flow in Curved Pipes,” J. Basic Eng., 81, pp. 123–134.
Konakov, P. K., 1946, “A New Correlation for the Friction Coefficient in Smooth Tubes,” Berichte der Akademie der Wissenschaften der UdSSR. Band LI, 51, pp. 503–506 (VDI Heat Atlas, 2010, Springer, p. 696).
Gnielinski, V., 1976, “New Equations for Heat and Mass Transfer in Turbulent Pipe and Channel Flow,” Int. Chem. Eng., 16, pp. 359–368.
Gnielinski, V., 2009, “Heat Transfer Coefficients for Turbulent Flow in Concentric Annular Ducts,” Heat Transfer Eng., 30, pp. 431–436. [CrossRef]
Gnielinski, V., 1986, “Heat Transfer and Pressure Drop in Helically Coiled Tubes,” Proceedings 8th International Heat Transfer Conference, San Francisco, Hemisphere, Washington DC, Vol. 6, pp. 2847–2854 (VDI Heat Atlas, Springer, 2010, p. 696).
Seban, R. A., and McLaughlin, E. F., 1963, “Heat Transfer in Tube Coils With Laminar and Turbulent Flow,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 6, pp. 387–395. [CrossRef]
Mori, Y., and Nakiyama, W., 1967, “Study on Forced Convective Heat Transfer in Curved Pipes: Part—III,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 10, pp. 681–695. [CrossRef]
Schmidt, E. F., 1967, “Wärmeübergang und Druckverlust in Rohrschlangen,” Chemie-Ingenieur - Technik, 39 Jahrgang, Heft 13, pp. 781–789. [CrossRef]
Piazza, I., and Ciofalo, M., 2009, “Numerical Prediction of Turbulent Flow and Heat Transfer in Helically Coiled Pipes,” Int. J. Therm. Sci., 49, pp. 653–663. [CrossRef]
Pethukov, B. S., 1970, “Heat Transfer and Friction in Turbulent Pipe Flow With Variable Physical Properties,” Adv. Heat Transfer, 6, pp. 1–69.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic diagram and coordinate system of the tube-in-tube heat exchanger

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Grid system for tube-in-tube heat exchanger

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Grid density versus Nu and f

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Developments of velocity and temperature fields for Coil B, Dni = 3200 and Dno = 3700 [((a) φ = 15 deg; (b) φ = 30 deg; (c) φ = 60 deg; (d) φ = 90 deg; (e) φ = 120 deg; (f) φ = 180 deg; (g) φ = 270 deg; (h) φ = 360 deg; (i) φ = 720 deg]). (a) Velocity fields for inner tube of the CTITHE; (b) velocity fields for outer tube of the CTITHE; (c) temperature fields for inner tube of the tube-in-tube heat exchanger; and (d) temperature fields for outer tube of the CTITHE.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Friction factor versus (a) inner Dean number and (b) outer Dean number.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Nusselt number versus (a) inner Dean number and (b) outer Dean number.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Nusselt number computed by CFD against that predicted by (a) Ginelinski correlation and (b) Pethukov correlation using computed values of f.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Nusselt number computed by CFD against that predicted by by (a) Ginelinski correlation using the values of f given by the Mishra and Gupta's correlation and (b) Pethukov correlation using the values of f given by the Ito's correlation.



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In