Metallic sandwich panels subject to underwater blast respond in a manner dependent on the relative time scales for core crushing and water cavitation. This article examines the response at impulses representative of an (especially relevant) domain: wherein the water cavitates before the core crushes. Three core topologies (square honeycomb, I-core, and corrugated) have been used to address fundamental issues affecting panel design. Their ranking is based on three performance metrics: the back-face deflection, the tearing susceptibility of the faces, and the loads transmitted to the supports. The results are interpreted by comparing with analytic solutions based on a three-stage response model. In stage I, the wet face acquires its maximum velocity with some water attached. In stage II, the core crushes and all of the constituents (wet and dry face and core) converge onto a common velocity. In stage III, the panel deflects and deforms, dissipating its kinetic energy by plastic bending, stretching, shearing, and indentation. The results provide insight about three aspects of the response. (i) Two inherently different regimes have been elucidated, designated strong (STC) and soft (SOC), differentiated by a stage II/III time scale parameter. The best overall performance has been found for soft-core designs. (ii) The foregoing analytic models are found to underestimate the kinetic energy and, consequently, exaggerate the performance benefits. The discrepancy has been resolved by a more complete model for the fluid/structure interaction. (iii) The kinetic energy acquired at the end of the second stage accounts fully for the plastic dissipation occurring in the third stage, indicating that the additional momentum acquired after the end of the second stage does not affect panel performance.

1.
Xue
,
Z.
, and
Hutchinson
,
J. W.
, 2003, “
Preliminary Assessment of Sandwich Plates Subject to Blast Loads
,”
Int. J. Mech. Sci.
0020-7403,
45
, pp.
687
705
.
2.
Xue
,
Z.
, and
Hutchinson
,
J. W.
, 2004, “
A Comparative Study of Impulse-Resistant Metallic Sandwich Plates
,”
Int. J. Impact Eng.
0734-743X,
30
, pp.
1283
1305
.
3.
Fleck
,
N. A.
, and
Deshpande
,
V. S.
, 2004, “
The Resistance of Clamped Sandwich Beams to Shock Loading
,”
ASME J. Appl. Mech.
0021-8936,
71
, pp.
386
401
.
4.
Deshpande
,
V. S.
, and
Fleck
,
N. A.
, 2005, “
One-Dimensional Shock Response of Sandwich Plates
,”
J. Mech. Phys. Solids
0022-5096,
53
, pp.
2347
2383
.
5.
Hutchinson
,
J. W.
, and
Xue
,
Z.
, 2005, “
Metal Sandwich Plates Optimized for Pressure Impulses
,”
Int. J. Mech. Sci.
0020-7403,
47
, pp.
545
569
.
6.
Qiu
,
X.
,
Deshpande
,
V. S.
, and
Fleck
,
N. A.
, 2003, “
Finite Element Analysis of the Dynamic Response of Clamped Sandwich Beams Subject to Shock Loading
,”
Eur. J. Mech. A/Solids
0997-7538,
22
, pp.
801
814
.
7.
Rabczuk
,
T.
,
Samaniego
,
E.
, and
Belytschko
,
T.
, 2005, “
Simplified Model for Predicting Impulse Loads on Submerged Structures to Account for Fluid-Structure Interaction
,” Int. J. Impact Engng., in press.
8.
Xue
,
Z.
, and
Hutchinson
,
J. W.
, 2005, “
Crush Dynamics of Square Honeycomb Sandwich Cores
,”
Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng.
0029-5981,
65
, pp.
2221
2245
.
9.
Cole
,
R. H.
, 1948,
Underwater Explosions
,
Princeton University Press
,
Princeton, NJ
.
10.
Hunter
,
K. S.
, and
Geers
,
T. L.
, 2004, “
Pressure and Velocity Fields Produced by an Underwater Explosion
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
0001-4966,
115
, pp.
1483
1496
.
11.
Shin
,
Y. S.
, 2004, “
Ship Shock Modeling and Simulation for Far-Field Underwater Explosion
,”
Comput. Struct.
0045-7949,
82
, pp.
2211
2219
.
12.
Klaseboer
,
E.
,
Hung
,
K. C.
,
Wang
,
C.
,
Wang
,
C. W.
,
Khoo
,
B. C.
,
Boyce
,
P.
,
Debono
,
S.
, and
Charlier
,
H.
, 2005, “
Experimental and Numerical Investigation of the Dynamics of an Underwater Explosion Bubble Near a Resilient/Rigid Structure
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
0022-1120,
537
, pp.
387
413
.
13.
Hayhurst
,
D. R.
,
Flores
,
S.
,
McMeeking
,
R. M.
, and
Evans
,
A. G.
, 2005, “
The Response of Metallic Panels to Water Blast: Deflections
,” submitted for publication.
14.
Deshpande
,
V. S.
, and
Fleck
,
N. A.
, 2005, private communication.
15.
Ashby
,
M. F.
,
Evans
,
A. G.
,
Fleck
,
N. A.
,
Gibson
,
L. J.
,
Hutchinson
,
J. W.
, and
Wadley
,
H. N. G.
, 2000,
Metal Foams: A Design Guide
,
Butterworth-Heinemann
,
Boston
.
16.
ABAQUS/Explicit User’s Manual, Version 6.4. Hibbitt, Karlsson and Sorensen Inc., 2003.
17.
Taylor
,
G. I.
, 1963, “
The Pressure and Impulse of Submarine Explosion Waves on Plates
,” in
The Scientific Papers of G.I. Taylor
, Vol.
III
,
Cambridge University Press
,
Cambridge
, UK, pp.
287
303
.
You do not currently have access to this content.