Metallic sandwich panels subject to underwater blast respond in a manner dependent on the relative time scales for core crushing and water cavitation. This article examines the response at impulses representative of an (especially relevant) domain: wherein the water cavitates before the core crushes. Three core topologies (square honeycomb, I-core, and corrugated) have been used to address fundamental issues affecting panel design. Their ranking is based on three performance metrics: the back-face deflection, the tearing susceptibility of the faces, and the loads transmitted to the supports. The results are interpreted by comparing with analytic solutions based on a three-stage response model. In stage I, the wet face acquires its maximum velocity with some water attached. In stage II, the core crushes and all of the constituents (wet and dry face and core) converge onto a common velocity. In stage III, the panel deflects and deforms, dissipating its kinetic energy by plastic bending, stretching, shearing, and indentation. The results provide insight about three aspects of the response. (i) Two inherently different regimes have been elucidated, designated strong (STC) and soft (SOC), differentiated by a stage II/III time scale parameter. The best overall performance has been found for soft-core designs. (ii) The foregoing analytic models are found to underestimate the kinetic energy and, consequently, exaggerate the performance benefits. The discrepancy has been resolved by a more complete model for the fluid/structure interaction. (iii) The kinetic energy acquired at the end of the second stage accounts fully for the plastic dissipation occurring in the third stage, indicating that the additional momentum acquired after the end of the second stage does not affect panel performance.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
January 2007
Technical Papers
The Response of Metallic Sandwich Panels to Water Blast
Yueming Liang,
Yueming Liang
Mechanical Engineering Department, Materials Department,
University of California
, Santa Barbara, CA 93106
Search for other works by this author on:
Alexander V. Spuskanyuk,
Alexander V. Spuskanyuk
Mechanical Engineering Department, Materials Department,
University of California
, Santa Barbara, CA 93106
Search for other works by this author on:
Shane E. Flores,
Shane E. Flores
Mechanical Engineering Department, Materials Department,
University of California
, Santa Barbara, CA 93106
Search for other works by this author on:
David R. Hayhurst,
David R. Hayhurst
School of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering,
The University of Manchester
, Manchester, M60 1QD, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
John W. Hutchinson,
John W. Hutchinson
Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences,
Harvard University
, Pierce Hall, Cambridge, MA 02138
Search for other works by this author on:
Robert M. McMeeking,
Robert M. McMeeking
Mechanical Engineering Department, Materials Department,
University of California
, Santa Barbara, CA 93106
Search for other works by this author on:
Anthony G. Evans
Anthony G. Evans
Mechanical Engineering Department, Materials Department,
University of California
, Santa Barbara, CA 93106
Search for other works by this author on:
Yueming Liang
Mechanical Engineering Department, Materials Department,
University of California
, Santa Barbara, CA 93106
Alexander V. Spuskanyuk
Mechanical Engineering Department, Materials Department,
University of California
, Santa Barbara, CA 93106
Shane E. Flores
Mechanical Engineering Department, Materials Department,
University of California
, Santa Barbara, CA 93106
David R. Hayhurst
School of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering,
The University of Manchester
, Manchester, M60 1QD, UK
John W. Hutchinson
Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences,
Harvard University
, Pierce Hall, Cambridge, MA 02138
Robert M. McMeeking
Mechanical Engineering Department, Materials Department,
University of California
, Santa Barbara, CA 93106
Anthony G. Evans
Mechanical Engineering Department, Materials Department,
University of California
, Santa Barbara, CA 93106J. Appl. Mech. Jan 2007, 74(1): 81-99 (19 pages)
Published Online: December 2, 2005
Article history
Received:
June 9, 2005
Revised:
December 2, 2005
Citation
Liang, Y., Spuskanyuk, A. V., Flores, S. E., Hayhurst, D. R., Hutchinson, J. W., McMeeking, R. M., and Evans, A. G. (December 2, 2005). "The Response of Metallic Sandwich Panels to Water Blast." ASME. J. Appl. Mech. January 2007; 74(1): 81–99. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2178837
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Related Articles
The Underwater Blast Resistance of Metallic Sandwich Beams With Prismatic Lattice Cores
J. Appl. Mech (March,2007)
Underwater Impulsive Response of a Sandwich Structure With a Multilayer Foam Core
J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng (October,2024)
Application of a Dynamic Constitutive Law to Multilayer Metallic Sandwich Panels Subject to Impulsive Loads
J. Appl. Mech (July,2007)
The Resistance of Clamped Sandwich Beams to Shock Loading
J. Appl. Mech (May,2004)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
The Influence of Fluid-Structure Interaction on Cloud Cavitation About a Hydrofoil
Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Cavitation (CAV2018)
Antilock-Braking System Using Fuzzy Logic
International Conference on Mechanical and Electrical Technology, 3rd, (ICMET-China 2011), Volumes 1–3
Numerical Simulation of Unsteady Cavitation in a Submerged Water Jet by Compressible Bubbly Mixture Flow Method
Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Cavitation (CAV2018)