0
Research Papers

Nonlinear Adaptive Magneto-Thermal Analysis at Bushing Regions of a Transformers Cover Using Finite Difference Method

[+] Author and Article Information
Mohammad Zia Zahedi

Physics Department,
Electro-Mechanic Faculty,
Kabul Polytechnic University,
Kabul 1001, Afghanistan;
Electrical and Electronics
Engineering Department,
Engineering Faculty,
Gazi University,
Ankara 06570, Turkey
e-mail: mzzahedi@gmail.com

I. Iskender

Professor
Electrical and Electronics
Engineering Department,
Engineering Faculty,
Çankaya University,
Ankara 06790, Turkey
e-mail: ires@cankaya.edu.tr

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Heat Transfer Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF THERMAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS. Manuscript received February 21, 2018; final manuscript received July 23, 2018; published online October 15, 2018. Assoc. Editor: Matthew R. Jones.

J. Thermal Sci. Eng. Appl 11(1), 011010 (Oct 15, 2018) (8 pages) Paper No: TSEA-18-1098; doi: 10.1115/1.4041345 History: Received February 21, 2018; Revised July 23, 2018

In this study, losses analysis at bushing regions of a transformer covers is done using finite difference method (FDM), considering that FDM being more flexible to deal with the nonlinear constitutive law and easier to be implemented than finite element (FE) and analytical methods. The analysis is performed based on a 2-level adaptive mesh solution of Maxwell equations and Ohm law at the cross section area in the axial symmetry page of a steel disk, taking account the nonlinear magnetic permeability of the steel. The losses density obtained, as a heat source, is imported into an alternating direction implicit (ADI) approach of heat conduction equation. Therefore, a finite difference (FD) solution algorithm for magneto-thermal analysis on cover plate is obtained by combination of adaptive mesh refinement and ADI-FDM, which improves the accuracy and decreases the computational time without losing accuracy. The reliability of the proposed technique is confirmed by experimental and FE method (FEM) results, considering the temperature distribution of the cover. The comparison of the results with those obtained from FEM and experiments shows the efficiency and capability of the method.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2019 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Maximov, S. , Escarela-Perez, R. , Olivares-Galvan, J. C. , Guzman, J. , and Campero-Littlewood, E. , 2016, “ New Analytical Formula for Temperature Assessment on Transformer Tanks,” IEEE Trans. Power Delivery, 31(3), pp. 1122–1131. [CrossRef]
Lopez-Fernandez, X. M. , Penabad-Duran, P. , and Turowski, J. , 2012, “ Three Dimensional Methodology for the Overheating Hazard Assessment on Transformer Covers,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., 48(5), pp. 1549–1555. [CrossRef]
Kulkarni, S. V. , and Khaparde, S. A. , 2004, Transformer Engineering: Design and Practice, CRC Press, New York.
Kulkarni, S. V. , Olivares, J. C. , Escarela-Perez, R. , Lakhiani, V. K. , and Turowski, J. , 2004, “ Evaluation of Eddy Current Losses in the Cover Plates of Distribution Transformers,” IEE Proc. Sci. Meas. Technol., 151(5), pp. 313–318. [CrossRef]
Lopez-Fernandez, X. M. , Penabad-Duran, P. , Turowski, J. , and Ribeiro, P. M. , 2012, “ Non-Linear Heating Hazard Assessment on Transformer Covers and Tank Walls,” Przeglad Elektrotech. (Elect. Rev.), 88(2), pp. 28–31.
Maximov, S. , Olivares-Galvan, J. C. , Magdaleno-Adame, S. , Escarela-Perez, R. , and Campero-Littlewood, E. , 2015, “ New Analytical Formulas for Electromagnetic Field and Eddy Current Losses in Bushing Regions of Transformers,” IEEE Trans. Magn., 51(4), p. 6300710.
Maximov, S. , Escarela Perez, R. , Magdaleno-Adame, S. , Olivares-Galvan, J. C. , and Campero-Littlewood, E. , 2015, “ Calculation of Nonlinear Electromagnetic Fields in the Steel Wall Vicinity of Transformer Bushings,” IEEE Trans. Magn., 51(6), p. 6300811.
Turowski, J. , and Pelikant, A. , 1997, “ Eddy Currents Losses and Hot-Spot Evaluation in Cover Plates of Power Transformers,” Proc. Inst. Elect. Eng. Elect. Power Appl., 144(6), pp. 435–440. [CrossRef]
Del Vecchio, R. M. , Poulin, B. , Feghali, P. T. , Shah, D. M. , and Ahuja, R. , 2010, Transformer Design Principles: With Applications to Core-Form Power Transformers, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Zahedi, M. Z. , and Iskender, I. , 2016, “ 3D FEM Optimal Design of Transformer Cover Plates to Decrease Stray Losses and Hot Spot Temperature,” Int. J. Tech. Phys. Probl. Eng. (IJTPE), 8(3), pp. 56–60. http://www.iotpe.com/IJTPE/IJTPE-2016/IJTPE-2016.html
Zahedi, M. Z. , and Iskender, I. , 2018, “ Fdm Electromagnetic Analysis in Bushing Regions OF Transformer,” Int. J. Tech. Phys. Probl. Eng. (IJTPE), 10(34), pp. 27–33. http://www.iotpe.com/IJTPE/IJTPE-2018/IJTPE-2018.html
Penabad-Durana, P. , Lopez-Fernandez, X. M. , and Turowski, J. , 2015, “ 3D Non-Linear Magneto-Thermal Behavior on Transformer Covers,” Electric Power Syst. Res., 121, pp. 333–340. [CrossRef]
Turowski, J. , 2014, Engineering Electodynamics: Electric Machine, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Olivares, J. C. , Escarela-Perez, R. , Kulkarni, S. V. , de Leon, F. , and Venegas-Vega, M. A. , 2004, “ 2D Finite-Element Determination of Tank Wall Losses in Pad-Mounted Transformers,” Electr. Power Syst. Res., 71(2), pp. 179–185. [CrossRef]
Olivares, J. C. , Escarela-Perez, R. , Kulkarni, S. V. , de Leon, F. , Melgoza-Vasquez, E. , and Hernandez-Anaya, O. , 2004, “ Improved Insert Geometry for Reducing Tank-Wall Losses in Pad-Mounted Transformers,” IEEE Trans. Power Delivery, 19(3), pp. 1120–1126. [CrossRef]
Del Vecchio, R. M. , and Ahuja, R. , 2013, “ Analytic Nonlinear Correction to the Impedance Boundary Condition,” IEEE Trans. Magn., 49(12), pp. 5687–5691. [CrossRef]
Sadiku, M. N. O. , 2011, Elements of Electromagnetics, Oxford University Press, New York.
He, Z. Z. , Xue, X. , and Liu, J. , 2013, “ An Effective Finite Difference Method for Simulation of Bioheat Transfer in Irregular Tissues,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 135(7), p. 071003. [CrossRef]
Srinivasa, N. A. , 2006, Adaptive Mesh Refinement for a Finite Difference Scheme Using a Quadtree Decomposition Approach, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
Chen, H. , Min, C. , and Gibou, F. , 2007, “ A Supra-Convergent Finite Difference Scheme for the Poisson and Heat Equations on Irregular Domains and Non-Graded Adaptive Cartesian Grids,” J. Sci. Comput., 31(1–2), pp. 19–60. [CrossRef]
Buljak, V. , 2011, Inverse Analyses With Model Reduction: Proper Orthogonal Decomposition in Structural Mechanics, Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin.
Holman, J. P. , 2010, Heat Transfer, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Patankar, S. , 1980, Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow, CRC Press, New York.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Illustration of two level local adaptive mesh

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

B–H curve for steel 1010 compared with a linear characteristics of μr = 900

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

(a) Idealized geometry and parameters at the cross section area near the bushing region of the cover plate used in the adaptive 2D FDM and (b) the computational stencil for the nonuniform FD scheme

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

The thermal BCs of the cover plate

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

The magnetic field Dirichlet BCs of the cover plate

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Waveforms of eddy losses distribution of the cover plate at steady-state conditions. Adaptive 2D FDM: (a) 500 A and (b) 1000 A.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Flux boundaries of the tank cover model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Calibration flowchart of the FDM magneto-thermal link models

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

The ADI-FDM, FEM and experimental results of temperature distribution on the top surface of the disk, z = 6 mm, for (a) 500A and (b) 1000 A

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Waveforms of magnetic field intensity of the cover plate at steady-state conditions. Adaptive 2D FDM: (a) 500 A and (b) 1000 A.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Waveforms of magnetic flux density of the cover plate at steady-state conditions. Adaptive 2D FDM: (a) 500 A and (b) 1000 A.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Alternating direction implicit transient solution of hot spot temperature of the cover plate at z = 6 mm

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

The steady-state temperature distribution on the cover plate cross section area. ADI-FDM: (a) 500 A and (b) 1000 A.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

The steady-state temperature distribution on the selected section of the cover plate. 3D FEM: (a) 500 A and (b) 1000 A.

Tables

Errata

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In