0
research-article

Heat Transfer Enhancement in Ferrofluids Flow in Micro and Macro Parallel Plate Channels: A Comparative Numerical Study

[+] Author and Article Information
Aditi Sengupta

Churchill College, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0DS, United Kingdom
dolaaditi@gmail.com

P.S. Ghoshdastidar

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur, U.P. 208016, India
psg@iitk.ac.in

1Corresponding author.

ASME doi:10.1115/1.4038483 History: Received August 09, 2016; Revised September 05, 2017

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative numerical study of heat transfer enhancement in steady, laminar, hydrodynamically fully developed flow of water-based ferrofluids under no magnetic field in micro and macro parallel plate channels subjected to constant equal heat fluxes on its top and bottom, considering Brownian diffusion and thermophoresis of ferroparticles in the base fluid. While the microchannel results match very well with the experimental data for water in an equivalent microtube [18], the numerically predicted enhancement factor in ferrofluids is much below that for microtube. However, the parametric study points to possible inaccuracies in the experimental results of Kurtoglu et al. [18] for ferrofluids. The nanoparticle concentration profiles in the microchannel flow reveal that (a) the nanoparticle concentration at the wall increases with axial distance; (b) the wall nanoparticle concentration decreases with increasing heat flux; and (c) the concentration profile of nanoparticles is parabolic at the exit. A comparison of thermally developing flow in microchannel and macrochannel of the same length (0.025 m) indicates that the enhancement factor at the microchannel exit is 1.089 which is only marginally higher than that at the macrochannel exit in the heat flux range of 20 - 80 kW/m2. On the other hand, for the thermally fully developed flow in both microchannel and macrochannel of the same length (0.54 m) the maximum enhancement factor for the macrochannel is 1.7, as compared to 1.1 for the microchannel, in the heat flux range of 1 - 4 kW/m2.

Copyright (c) 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In