0
Research Papers

Nonboiling Heat Transfer and Friction of Air/Water Mist Flow in a Square Duct With Orthogonal Ribs

[+] Author and Article Information
Yi-Hsuan Huang

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
National Chiao-Tung University,
Hsinchu 30010, Taiwan
e-mail: john.me98@nctu.edu.tw

Chiao-Hsin Chen

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
National Chiao-Tung University,
Hsinchu 30010, Taiwan
e-mail: soybean.me98@gmail.com

Yao-Hsien Liu

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
National Chiao-Tung University,
Hsinchu 30010, Taiwan
e-mail: yhliu@mail.nctu.edu.tw

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Heat Transfer Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF THERMAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS. Manuscript received November 1, 2016; final manuscript received May 2, 2017; published online August 1, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Amir Jokar.

J. Thermal Sci. Eng. Appl 9(4), 041014 (Aug 01, 2017) (9 pages) Paper No: TSEA-16-1311; doi: 10.1115/1.4037132 History: Received November 01, 2016; Revised May 02, 2017

Heat transfer of air/water mist flow in a single-side heated vertical duct was experimentally investigated. The mist flow was produced by introducing fine dispersed water droplets into the air stream, and the water–air mass flow ratios were up to 15%. The Reynolds numbers of the air flow were 7900, 16,000, and 24,000. The rib spacing-to-height ratios were 10 and 20 in the current study. Mist flow cooling achieved higher heat transfer rates mainly because of the droplet deposition and liquid film formation on the heated surface. The heat transfer enhancement on the smooth surface by the mist flow was 4–6 times as high as the air flow. On the ribbed surface, a smaller rib spacing of 10 was preferred for air cooling, since the heat transfer enhancement by the flow reattachment was better utilized. However, the rib-induced secondary flow blew away the liquid films on the surface, and the heat transfer enhancement was degraded near the reattachment region for the mist cooling. A larger rib spacing-to-height ratio of 20 thus achieved higher heat transfer because of the liquid film formation beyond the reattachment region. The heat transfer enhancement on the ribbed surface using mist flow was 2.5–3.5 times as high as the air flow. The friction factor of the mist flow was two times as high as the air flow in the ribbed duct.

Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Experimental setup

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Ribbed surfaces and the measurement region

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Calibration results of the infrared camera

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Nusselt number distribution of the air cooling case

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Comparison of the average Nusselt number ratios of the smooth and ribbed cases with the literatures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Conceptual view of the mist flow cooling

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Nusselt number distribution of the mist flow over a smooth surface

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Nusselt number distribution of the mist flow over ribbed surfaces (P/e = 20)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Nusselt number distribution of the mist flow over ribbed surfaces (P/e = 10)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Heat transfer enhancement by mist flow over ribbed surfaces

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Spanwise-averaged Nusselt numbers

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Overall-averaged Nusselt numbers

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Friction factors for the ribbed cases

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In