Research Papers

A New Mathematical Model to Understand the Convective Heat Transfer Mechanism in Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage Process

[+] Author and Article Information
Zhaoxiang Zhang

MOE Key Laboratory of Petroleum Engineering,
China University of Petroleum,
Beijing 102249, China
e-mail: zhangzhaoxiang2008@126.com

Huiqing Liu

MOE Key Laboratory of Petroleum Engineering,
China University of Petroleum,
Beijing 102249, China
e-mail: 540213951@qq.com

Xiaohu Dong

MOE Key Laboratory of Petroleum Engineering,
China University of Petroleum,
Beijing 102249, China
e-mail: donghu820@163.com

Huanli Jiang

Drilling Company 3 of Sinopec Zhongyuan
Petroleum Engineering Co., Ltd.,
Puyang 457000, China
e-mail: sdqh119@163.com

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Heat Transfer Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF THERMAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS. Manuscript received October 7, 2016; final manuscript received January 21, 2017; published online July 6, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Giulio Lorenzini.

J. Thermal Sci. Eng. Appl 10(1), 011006 (Jul 06, 2017) (8 pages) Paper No: TSEA-16-1287; doi: 10.1115/1.4036789 History: Received October 07, 2016; Revised January 21, 2017

Steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) process has been an optimized method to explore heavy oil reservoirs in the world. The oil viscosity reduction and gravity force near the interface of steam–chamber are the main development mechanisms. In classical models, conductive heat transfer plays the only or dominant role in the heat transmission from high-temperature steam to low-temperature oil sands. Although some mathematical studies have paid attention to the convective heat transfer, the role of heat transfer by flowable oil normal to the steam–chamber interface has been given little attention. In SAGD, the viscosity of bitumen can be reduced by several orders of magnitude by the release of latent heat from injected steam. In this study, an analytical model is developed for the heat transfer process induced by flowable oil. Also, in order to accurately simulate the oil viscosity characteristics in steam–chamber, a correlation between oil viscosity and pressure is proposed. Results indicate that the oil mobility plays an important role on the flow normal to interface when the distance is smaller than 6 m. Even under the most extreme circumstances (μw = 0.1127 cp), the flowing of oil normal to steam–chamber interface also cannot be ignored. Comparing to Irani and Ghannadi model, it can be easy to draw the conclusion that the new model consists with the underground test facility (UTF) field data much better. This new analytical model will benefit to understanding the convective heat transfer mechanism in SAGD process.

Copyright © 2018 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Liu, Y. M. , Zhang, L. , Ren, S. R. , Ren, B. , Wang, S. T. , and Xu, G. R. , 2016, “ Injection of Nitrogen Foam for Improved Oil Recovery in Viscous Oil Reservoirs Offshore Bohai Bay China,” SPE Improved Oil Recovery Conference (IOR), Tulsa, OK, Apr. 11–13, SPE Paper No. SPE-179584-MS.
Shi, H. F. , Zhou, H. Y. , Hu, Y. , He, Y. F. , Fu, R. , and Ren, B. , 2016, “ A New Method to Design and Optimize the ICD for Horizontal Wells,” Offshore Technology Conference (OTC), Houston, TX, May 2–5, SPE Paper No. OTC-26905-MS.
Butler, R. M. , and Stephens, D. J. , 1981, “ The Gravity Drainage of Steam-Heated Heavy Oil to Parallel Horizontal Wells,” J. Can. Pet. Technol., 20(2), pp. 90–96. [CrossRef]
Butler, R. M. , 1985, “ A New Approach to the Modelling of Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage,” J. Can. Pet. Technol., 24(3), pp. 42–51. [CrossRef]
Butler, R. M. , 1987, “ Rise of Interfering Steam Chambers,” J. Can. Pet. Technol., 26(3), pp. 70–75. [CrossRef]
Butler, R. M. , 1991, Thermal Recovery of Oil and Bitumen, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Butler, R. M. , 1994, “ Horizontal Wells for the Recovery of Oil, Gas and Bitumen, Petroleum Society Monograph,” Vol. 2, Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum, Westmount, QC, Canada.
Butler, R. M. , 1994, “ Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage, Concept, Development, Performance and Future,” J. Can. Pet. Technol., 33(2), pp. 44–50. [CrossRef]
Chen, Q. , Gerritsen, M. G. , and Kovscek, A. R. , 2007, “ Effects of Reservoir Heterogeneities on the Steam-Assisted Gravity-Drainage Process,” SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Anaheim, CA, Nov. 11–14, SPE Paper No. SPE-109873-MS.
Reis, J. C. , 1992, “ A Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage Model for Tar Sands: Linear Geometry,” J. Can. Pet. Technol., 31(10), pp. 14–20. [CrossRef]
Reis, J. C. , 1993, “ A Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage Model for Tar Sands: Radial Geometry,” J. Can. Pet. Technol., 32(8), pp. 43–48. [CrossRef]
Montgomery, W. , Court, R. W. , Rees, A. C. , and Sephton, M. A. , 2013, “ High Temperature Reactions of Water With Heavy Oil and Bitumen: Insights Into Aquathermolysis Chemistry During Steam-Assisted Recovery,” Fuel, 113, pp. 426–434. [CrossRef]
Gates, I. D. , and Larter, S. R. , 2014, “ Energy Efficiency and Emissions Intensity of SAGD,” Fuel, 115, pp. 706–713. [CrossRef]
Keshavarz, M. , Okuno, R. , and Babadagli, T. , 2015, “ A Semi-Analytical Solution to Optimize Single-Component Solvent Coinjection With Steam During SAGD,” Fuel, 144, pp. 400–414. [CrossRef]
Ji, D. Q. , Zhong, H. , and Dong, M. , 2015, “ Study of Heat Transfer by Thermal Expansion of Connate Water Ahead of a Steam Chamber Edge in the Steam-Assisted-Gravity-Drainage Process,” Fuel, 150, pp. 592–601. [CrossRef]
Hashemi-Kiasari, H. , Hemmati-Sarapardeh, A. , Mighani, S. , Mohammadi, A. H. , and Sedaee-Sola, B. , 2014, “ Effect of Operational Parameters on SAGD Performance in a Dip Heterogeneous Fractured Reservoir,” Fuel, 122, pp. 82–93. [CrossRef]
Liang, G. , Liu, S. Q. , Shen, P. P. , Liu, Y. , and Luo, Y. Y. , 2016, “ A New Optimization Method for Steam-Liquid Level Intelligent Control Model in Oil Sands Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) Process,” Pet. Explor. Dev., 43(2), pp. 301–307. [CrossRef]
Faroiq-Ali, S. M. , 1997, “ Is There Life After SAGD?,” J. Can. Pet. Technol., 36(6), pp. 20–24.
Ito, Y. , and Suzuki, S. , 1996, “ Numerical Simulation of the SAGD Process in the Hangingstone Oil Sands Reservoir,” Annual Technical Meeting, Calgary, AB, Canada, June 10–12, SPE Paper No. PETSOC-96-57.
Edmunds, N. , 1999, “ On the Difficult Birth of SAGD,” J. Can. Pet. Technol., 38(1), pp. 14–24. [CrossRef]
Ito, Y. , and Suzuki, S. , 1999, “ Numerical Simulation of the SAGD Process in the Hangingstone Oil Sands Reservoir,” J. Can. Pet. Technol., 38(9), pp. 27–35. [CrossRef]
Jimenez, J. , 2008, “ The Field Performance of SAGD Projects in Canada,” International Petroleum Technology Conference, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Dec. 3–5, SPE Paper No. IPTC-12860-MS.
Sharma, J. , and Gates, I. D. , 2011, “ Convection at the Edge of a Steam-Assisted-Gravity-Drainage Steam Chamber,” SPE J., 16(3), pp. 503–512. [CrossRef]
Irani, M. , and Ghannadi, S. , 2013, “ Understanding the Heat-Transfer Mechanism in the Steam-Assisted Gravity-Drainage (SAGD) Process and Comparing the Conduction and Convection Flux in Bitumen Reservoirs,” SPE. J., 18(1), pp. 134–145. [CrossRef]
Irani, M. , and Gates, I. D. , 2013, “ Understanding the Convection Heat-Transfer Mechanism in Steam-Assisted-Gravity-Drainage Process,” SPE. J., 18(6), pp. 1202–1216. [CrossRef]
Sharma, J. , and Gates, I. D. , 2010, “ Multiphase Flow at the Edge of a Steam Chamber,” Can. J. Chem. Eng., 88(3), pp. 312–321.
Ito, Y. , Suzuki, S. , and Yamada, H. , 1998, “ Effect of Reservoir Parameter on Oil Rates and Steam Oil Ratios in SAGD Projects,” Seventh UNITAR International Conference on Heavy Crude and Tar Sands, Beijing, Oct. 17–30, pp. 36–43.
Braden, W. B. , 1966, “ A Viscosity-Temperature Correlation at Atmospheric Pressure for Gas-Free Oils,” J. Pet. Technol., 18(11), pp. 1487–1490. [CrossRef]
Birrell, G. , 2003, “ Heat Transfer Ahead of a SAGD Steam Chamber: A Study of Thermocouple Data From Phase B of the Underground Test Facility (Dover Project),” Petroleum Society of CIM's Canadian International Petroleum Conference, Calgary, AB, Canada, June 12–14, SPE Paper No. PETSOC-03-03-04.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic of SAGD process

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

The results of heat fluxes: (a) the results of conductive heat flux, (b) the results of convective heat flux, and (c) the results of total heat flux

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

The results of the mobility of oil and water phase: (a) the results of oil and water mobility and (b) the mobility difference (λo/λw) between oil and water

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Effect of oil relative permeability

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Effect of the advancing front of steam–chamber velocity

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Effect of constant m

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Effect of constant n

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Three-dimensional gravity drainage experiment apparatus

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

The temperature-field characteristics in SAGD experiment: (a) the result after 130 min, (b) the result after 230 min, and (c) the result after 320 min

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

The temperature distribution and pressure distribution in SAGD experiment

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

The viscosity difference (m = 3.6, n = 2.075)




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In