Technical Brief

Lower Dimensional Model for Modeling the Heat Transfer and Detailed Reactions Inside Long Channels

[+] Author and Article Information
Rakesh Yadav

ANSYS, Inc.,
San Diego, CA 92121
e-mail: Rakesh.yadav@ansys.com

Ellen Meeks

ANSYS, Inc.,
San Diego, CA 92121
e-mail: Ellen.meeks@ansys.com

Graham Goldin

ANSYS, Inc.,
Lebanon, NH 03766

Stefano Orsino

ANSYS, Inc.,
Lebanon, NH 03766
e-mail: stefano.orsino@ansys.com

Contributed by the Heat Transfer Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF THERMAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS. Manuscript received January 11, 2014; final manuscript received December 23, 2015; published online September 27, 2016. Assoc. Editor: John C. Chai.

J. Thermal Sci. Eng. Appl 9(1), 014501 (Sep 27, 2016) (4 pages) Paper No: TSEA-14-1009; doi: 10.1115/1.4032606 History: Received January 11, 2014; Revised December 23, 2015

A methodology has been developed for coupling the one-dimensional (1D) solution of flow inside the nonpermeable channels with the 3D outer flow in shell and tube type of configurations. In the proposed reacting channel, the 1D channels have detailed reactions while the outer 3D flow can be reactive or nonreactive. The channels are discretized into 1D grid points and a parabolic solver is used to solve the species transport and energy equations inside the channels. Since the walls of the channels are nonpermeable, the two zones are coupled only through the heat transfer. The current approach is tested and validated for a series of problems with increasing complexities. The predictions of the channel model (CM) are compared with 3D modeling of the channels and experimental data. The CM predictions are in excellent agreement with the fully resolved (FR) model with much less computational cost. The discussed methodology is useful for applications such as fuel reformers, hydrocarbon cracking furnaces, heat exchangers, etc.

Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Sundaram, K. M. , and Froment, G. F. , 1977, “ Modeling of Thermal Cracking Kinetics. 1. Thermal Cracking of Ethane, Propane and Their Mixtures,” Chem. Eng. Sci., 32(6), pp. 601–608. [CrossRef]
Lee, S. , Bae, J. , Lim, S. , and Park, J. , 2008, “ Improved Configuration of Supported Nickel Catalysts in a Steam Reformer for Effective Hydrogen Production From Methane,” J. Power Sources, 180(1), pp. 506–515. [CrossRef]
Kattkea, K. J. , Brauna, R. J. , Colclasurea, A. M. , and Goldin, G. , 2011, “ High-Fidelity Stack and System Modeling for Tubular Solid Oxide Fuel Cell System Design and Thermal Management,” J. Power Sources, 196(8), pp. 3790–3802. [CrossRef]
Lindström, B. , Karlsson, J. A. J. , Ekdunge, P. , De Verdier, L. , Häggendal, B. , Dawody, J. , Nilsson, M. , and Petterssonc, L. J. , 2009, “ Diesel Fuel Reformer for Automotive Fuel Cell Applications,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 34(8), pp. 3367–3381. [CrossRef]
Goldin, G. , Zhu, H. , Kattke, K. , Dean, A. M. , Braun, R. , Kee, R. J. , Zhang, D. , Maier, L. , and Deutchmann, O. , 2009, “ Coupling Complex Reformer Chemical Kinetics With Three-Dimensional Computational Fluid Dynamics,” ECS Trans., 25(2), pp. 1253–1262.
Stefanidis, G. D. , Merci, B. , Heynderickx, G. J. , and Marin, G. B. , 2006, “ CFD Simulations of Steam Cracking Furnaces Using Detailed Combustion Mechanisms,” Comput. Chem. Eng., 30(4), pp. 635–649. [CrossRef]
Detemmerman, T. , and Froment, F. , 1998, “ Three Dimensional Coupled Simulation of Furnaces and Reactor Tubes for the Thermal Cracking of Hydrocarbons,” Rev. Inst. Fr. Pet., 53(2), pp. 182–194.
Grcar, J. F. , Kee, R. J. , Smooke, M. D. , and Miller, J. A. , 1988, “ A Hybrid Newton/Time-Integration Procedure for the Solution of Steady, Laminar, One-Dimensional, Premixed Flames,” Proc. Combust. Inst., 21(1), pp. 1773–1782. [CrossRef]
Incropera, F. , DeWitt, D. , Bergman, T. , and Lavine, F. , 2007, Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer, 6th ed., Wiley, New York.
ANSYS Fluent 14.5 User Guide, “ ANSYS Inc.,” www.ansys.com
Westbrook, C. K. , and Dryer, F. L. , 1981, “ Simplified Reaction Mechanisms for the Oxidation of Hydrocarbon Fuels in Flames,” Combust. Sci. Technol., 27(1–2), pp. 31–43. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Curved channel with variable area: (a) geometry and dimensions and (b) temperature and the velocity profiles along channel length

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

T-shaped configuration with (a) geometry, and profiles of bulk mean and wall temperature with two modeling approaches for (b) tube-1, (c) tube-2, and (d) tube-3

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Ethane fuel cracking with the CM: (a) geometry and (b) species mole fractions at the exit



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In