0
Research Papers

A Simplified Model for Effective Thermal Conductivity of Highly Porous Ceramic Fiber Insulation

[+] Author and Article Information
Nicholas P. G. Lumley

Colorado School of Mines,
Golden, CO 80401
e-mail: nlumley@burnsmcd.com

Emory Ford

Materials Technology Institute,
St. Louis, MO 63141
e-mail: eford@mti-global.org

Eric Minford

Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.,
Allentown, PA 18195
e-mail: minfore@airproducts.com

Jason M. Porter

Colorado School of Mines,
Golden, CO 80401
e-mail: jporter@mines.edu

Contributed by the Heat Transfer Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF THERMAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS. Manuscript received October 16, 2014; final manuscript received July 13, 2015; published online October 6, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Srinath V. Ekkad.

J. Thermal Sci. Eng. Appl 7(4), 041022 (Oct 06, 2015) (11 pages) Paper No: TSEA-14-1247; doi: 10.1115/1.4031540 History: Received October 16, 2014; Revised July 13, 2015

Highly porous ceramic fiber insulations are beginning to be considered as a replacement for firebrick insulations in high temperature, high pressure applications by the chemical process industry. However, the implementation of such materials has been impeded by a lack of experimental data and predictive models, especially at high gas pressure. The goal of this work was to develop a general, applied thermophysical model to predict effective thermal conductivity, keff, of porous ceramic fiber insulation materials and to determine the temperature, pressure, and gas conditions under which natural convection is a possible mode of heat transfer. A model was developed which calculates keff as the sum of conduction, convection, and radiation partial conductivities. The model was validated using available experimental data, including laboratory measurements made by this research effort. Overall, it was concluded that natural convection is indeed possible for the most porous insulations at pressures exceeding 10 atm. Furthermore, keff for some example insulations was determined as a function of temperature, pressure, and gas environment.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

SEM images at 500× magnification of Danser Vacuduct 2300 (a), Zircar AL30 (b), and Unifrax Durablanket S #6 (c). Materials A and B are composed of a heterogeneous matrix of fibers, sheets, spheroidal particles, and other irregular geometries. Material C is composed of smooth cylindrical fibers with nonuniform orientation.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Illustration of heat transport pathways in porous ceramic insulation. (a) Convective cells can form in highly porous insulations. (b) and (c) Heat transfer at the microscale is a combination of several mechanisms including fluid conduction, kfluid, solid conduction, ksolid, radiation, krad, and convection, kconv.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Fibrous (C-like) material validation, plotted as Tmean. A strong agreement between literature data (markers) and the model is seen both at low temperatures, validating the conduction model, and at high temperatures validating the radiation model. All data points at 1 atm air. Data from Refs. [14] and [16].

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Fibrous (C-like) material validation in vacuum, data from Ref. [2]. Vacuum data validate the conduction model at low temperature and radiation model at high temperature.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Fibrous (C-like) material validation in vacuum, experimental data. The model shows excellent agreement at temperatures below 850 K, validating the conduction model. Data from contract laboratory.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Validation against data from manufacturer of material B. Comparison was made to manufacturer supplied data in air at 1 atm. A strong agreement is found at temperatures above 500 K.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Material A validation in 1 atm N2. Good general agreement between the model and measured data is observed. The model slightly underpredicts keff at low temperatures. Data from contract laboratory.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Material A validation in vacuum. The model performs well in the vacuum condition, where fluid conduction and convection are not possible. Data from contract laboratory.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Variation of keff with permeability. keff increases with the square root of permeability at temperature and pressure conditions sufficient to drive natural convection. The model is not sensitive to permeability in the absence of natural convection. The variation is relatively strong, especially for geometrically heterogeneous materials. Note that the ordinate scale is small due to the small values of permeability in the SI system.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Variation of keff with mean diameter. The variation of keff with mean diameter is almost linear due to a linear increase in radiation transport with larger diameter and reduced number density of fibers. The effect on permeability and convective transport is relatively smaller.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Conduction contribution to keff in N2 at 1 atm

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Pressure dependence of keff at low pressure. Under full vacuum, heat transfer is solely by solid conduction and radiation. As pressure increases the saturating gas assumes a continuum behavior and attains its limiting fluid conductivity value.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

krad shows the typical power-law response of radiative heat transport. High-density material B shows superior attenuation. The large number of scattering centers in material C results in better performance than the denser material A.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Onset of natural convection at 20 atm in N2. The more permeable material C supports natural convection at a lower temperature than the denser, less permeable materials A and B.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Onset of natural convection at 800 K in N2. Note that the pressure where Ra > 40 decreases with increasing temperature. The most permeable materials A and C allow natural convection at lower pressures than material B.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Sensitivity of keff of material C to porosity, φ. Analysis conducted at 800 K in N2. The inflection point reflects a balance between solid conduction by increased fiber-to-fiber contact versus reduced radiative and convective transport due to increased fiber density.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

keff of materials A, B, and C in N2 at 1, 20, and 40 atm

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In