0
Technical Brief

Experimental and Numerical Investigations of Shock-Film Cooling Interaction on a Turbine Blade With Fan-Shaped Cooling Holes

[+] Author and Article Information
S. Xue

Mechanical Engineering Department,
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University,
Blacksburg, VA 24061
e-mail: xuesong@vt.edu

A. Arisi

Mechanical Engineering Department,
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University,
Blacksburg, VA 24061
e-mail: arisi@vt.edu

W. Ng

Mechanical Engineering Department,
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University,
Blacksburg, VA 24061
e-mail: wng@vt.edu

1Corresponding author.

2Currently at Techsburg Inc. in Christiansburg, VA 24073; email: sxue@techsburg.com.

Contributed by the Heat Transfer Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF THERMAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS. Manuscript received February 7, 2015; final manuscript received June 10, 2015; published online September 22, 2015. Assoc. Editor: John C. Chai.

J. Thermal Sci. Eng. Appl 7(4), 044502 (Sep 22, 2015) (6 pages) Paper No: TSEA-15-1038; doi: 10.1115/1.4031465 History: Received February 07, 2015; Revised June 10, 2015

This paper presents the findings of an experimental and numerical investigation on the shock effect on heat transfer coefficient and film-cooling effectiveness. In this study, coolant was injected on the blade surface through a fan-shaped hole in a transonic cascade. The experimental results indicate that on the film-cooled suction surface of the blade, the shock from the adjacent blade impinging on the suction surface causes the film-cooling effectiveness to drop quickly by 18%, and then stay at a low level downstream of the shock. The shock also causes the local heat transfer coefficient to decrease rapidly by 25%, but then rise back up immediately after the shock. The results from the numerical study supported the film-cooling effectiveness and heat transfer coefficient trends that were observed in the experiment. A detailed analysis of the numerical results reveals that the rapid change of the film-cooling effectiveness is due to the near surface secondary flows, which push the hot mainstream air toward the injection centerline and lifts the low temperature core away from the surface. This secondary flow is a result of a spanwise pressure gradient. The drop in heat transfer coefficient is caused by a boundary layer separation bubble which results from an adverse streamwise pressure gradient at the shock position.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Popp, O. , Smith, D. E. , Bubb, J. V. , Grabowski, H. C. , Diller, T. E. , Schetz, J. A. , and Ng, W. F. , 2000, “ An Investigation of Heat Transfer in a Film Cooled Transonic Turbine Cascade, Part II: Unsteady Heat Transfer,” ASME Paper No. GT-2000-203.
Ligrani, P. M. , Saumweber, C. , Schulz, A. , and Wittig, S. , 2001, “ Shock Wave-Film Cooling Interactions in Transonic Flows,” ASME J. Turbomach., 123(4), pp. 788–797. [CrossRef]
Zhang, C. X.-Z. , and Hassan, I. , 2009, “ Computational Study of the Effects of Shock Waves on Film Cooling Effectiveness,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 131(3), p. 031901. [CrossRef]
Göttlich, E. , Lang, H. , Sanz, W. , and Woisetschläger, J. , 2002, “ Experimental Investigation of an Innovative Cooling System (ICS) for High Temperature Transonic Turbine Stages,” ASME Paper No. GT-2002-30341.
Ochs, M. , Schulz, A. , and Bauer, H.-J. , 2007, “ Investigation of The Influence of Trailing Edge Shock Waves on Film Cooling Performance of Gas Turbine Airfoils,” ASME Paper No. GT-2007-27482.
Carnevale, M. , D'Ammaro, A. , Montomoli, F. , and Salvadori, S. , 2014, “ Film Cooling and Shock Interaction: An Uncertainty Quantification Analysis With Transonic Flows,” ASME Paper No. GT2014-25024.
Xue, S. , Ng, W. , Zhang, L. , and Moon, H. , 2012, “ Fan-Shaped Hole Film Cooling on Turbine Blade in a Transonic Cascade With High Freestream Turbulence,” 50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Nashville, TN, AIAA Paper No. AIAA-2012-0368.
Xue, S. , Roy, A. , Ng, W. F. , and Ekkad, S. V. , 2014, “ A Novel Transient Technique to Determine Recovery Temperature, Heat Transfer Coefficient, and Film Cooling Effectiveness Simultaneously in a Transonic Turbine Cascade,” ASME J. Therm. Sci. Eng. Appl., 7(1), p. 011016. [CrossRef]
Wu, H. , Nasir, S. , Ng, W. F. , and Moon, H. K. , 2008, “ Showerhead Film Cooling Performance of a Transonic Turbine Vane at High Freestream Turbulence (Tu = 16%): 3-D CFD and Comparison with Experiment,” ASME Paper No. IMECE2008-67782.
Xue, S. , 2012, “ Fan-Shaped Hole Film Cooling on Turbine Blade and Vane in a Transonic Cascade With High Freestream Turbulence,” Ph.D. thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA.
Carullo, J. S. , Nasir, S. , Cress, R. D. , Ng, W. F. , Thole, K. , Zhang, L. , and Moon, H. , 2010, “ The Effects of Freestream Turbulence, Turbulence Length Scale, and Exit Reynolds Number on Turbine Blade Heat Transfer in a Transonic Cascade,” ASME J. Turbomach., 133(1), p. 011030. [CrossRef]
Berhe, M. K. , and Patankar, S. V. , 1999, “ Curvature Effects on Discrete Hole Film Cooling,” ASME J. Turbomach., 121(4), pp. 781–791. [CrossRef]
Berhe, M. K. , and Patankar, S. V. , 1999, “ Investigation of Discrete-Hole Film Cooling Parameters Using Curved-Plate Models,” ASME J. Turbomach., 121(4), pp. 792–803. [CrossRef]
de la Loma, A. , Paniagua, G. , Verrastro, D. , and Adami, P. , 2008, “ Transonic Turbine Stage Heat Transfer Investigation in Presence of Strong Shocks,” ASME J. Turbomach., 130(3), p. 031019. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Test blade and fan-shaped hole geometry

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Mach number distributions comparison between numerical and experimental results

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Film cooling effectiveness comparison between numerical and experimental results

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Heat transfer coefficient comparison between numerical and experimental results

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Cross stream vector plot and streamwise velocity colormap at different distance from SS injection. (a) sinject/d = 1.0, (b) sinject/d = 3.0, (c) sinject/d = 6.0.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Cross stream contour of Mach number at 2.0d upstream of the shock

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Suction surface 2D contour map of (a) Eta and (b) HTC

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Secondary flow velocity vector and static temperature color map (a) 1.0d before shock, (b) at shock, and (c) 1.0d after shock

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In