0
Research Papers

Steady-State Performance of a Rectangular Natural Circulation Loop With Differentially Heated Parallel Channels

[+] Author and Article Information
Shubhankar Chakraborty

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur,
Kharagpur 721302, West Bengal, India
e-mail: shubhankar@mech.iitkgp.ernet.in

Prasanta Kr. Das

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur,
Kharagpur 721302, West Bengal, India
e-mail: pkd@mech.iitkgp.ernet.in

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Heat Transfer Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF THERMAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS. Manuscript received June 4, 2014; final manuscript received February 10, 2015; published online November 11, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Suman Chakraborty.

J. Thermal Sci. Eng. Appl 8(1), 011022 (Nov 11, 2015) (9 pages) Paper No: TSEA-14-1143; doi: 10.1115/1.4030692 History: Received June 04, 2014

Natural circulation loop (NCL) transfers thermal energy without using any external power. As with phase change, one can expect a higher rate of heat transfer and a greater change in density, NCL with a phase change of the circulating fluid is a more effective energy transfer device. Though in many of the practical NCLs there are multiple heating risers, the characteristics of NCLs with parallel boiling risers have not been investigated in detail. In the present work, the steady-state behavior of a two-phase NCL with two parallel boiling risers for water as the working fluid has been investigated. Emphasis has been given to the performance of the loop when the risers are differentially heated. Effect of different parameters on the loop circulation rate and energy transport for both equally and differentially heated conditions has been thoroughly examined and compared to the performance of a single-riser loop under equivalent working condition.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Basu, D. N. , Bhattacharyya, S. , and Das, P. , 2014, “A Review of Modern Advances in Analyses and Applications of Single-Phase Natural Circulation Loop in Nuclear Thermal Hydraulics,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 280, pp. 326–348. [CrossRef]
Bhattacharyya, S. , Basu, D. N. , and Das, P. K. , 2012, “Two-Phase Natural Circulation Loops: A Review of the Recent Advances,” Heat Transfer Eng., 33(4–5), pp. 461–482. [CrossRef]
Nayak, A. , and Vijayan, P. , 2008, “Flow Instabilities in Boiling Two-Phase Natural Circulation Systems: A Review,” Sci. Technol. Nucl. Install., 2008, p. 573192. [CrossRef]
Lee, Y. , and Mital, U. , 1972, “A Two-Phase Closed Thermosyphon,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 15(9), pp. 1695–1707. [CrossRef]
Ramos, E. , Sen, M. , and Trevino, C. , 1985, “A Steady-State Analysis for Variable Area One- and Two-Phase Thermosyphon Loops,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 28(9), pp. 1711–1719. [CrossRef]
Nayak, A. , Dubey, P. , Chavan, D. , and Vijayan, P. , 2007, “Study on the Stability Behaviour of Two-Phase Natural Circulation Systems Using a Four-Equation Drift Flux Model,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 237(4), pp. 386–398. [CrossRef]
Kim, J. C. , Ha, K. S. , Park, R. J. , Kim, S. B. , and Hong, S. W. , 2008, “Loop Analysis of a Natural Circulation Two-Phase Flow Under an External Reactor Vessel Cooling,” Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transfer, 35(8), pp. 1001–1006. [CrossRef]
Rao, N. , Sekhar, C. C. , Maiti, B. , and Das, P. , 2006, “Steady-State Performance of a Two-Phase Natural Circulation Loop,” Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transfer, 33(8), pp. 1042–1052. [CrossRef]
Basu, D. N. , Bhattacharyya, S. , and Das, P. , 2009, “Steady-State Behavior of a Two-Phase Natural Circulation Loop With Thermodynamic Nonequilibrium,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 131(2), p. 022901. [CrossRef]
Takeda, T. , Kawamura, H. , and Seki, M. , 1987, “Natural Circulation in Parallel Vertical Channels With Different Heat Inputs,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 104(2), pp. 133–143. [CrossRef]
Fukuda, K. , and Hasegawa, S. , 1979, “Analysis on Two-Phase Flow Instability in Parallel Multichannels,” J. Nucl. Sci. Technol., 16(3), pp. 190–199. [CrossRef]
Marcel, C. , Rohde, M. , and Van der Hagen, T. , 2005, “Out-of-Phase Flashing Induced Instabilities in the Circus Facility,” Proceedings of the 11th International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Reactor Thermal-Hydraulics (NURETH-11), pp. 1–7.
Goudarzi, N. , and Talebi, S. , 2013, “Linear Stability Analysis of a Double-Channel Two-Phase Natural Circulation Loop,” Prog. Nucl. Energy, 67, pp. 114–123. [CrossRef]
Basu, N. , Warrier, G. R. , and Dhir, V. K. , 2005, “Wall Heat Flux Partitioning During Subcooled Flow Boiling: Part 1—Model Development,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 127(2), pp. 131–140. [CrossRef]
Whalley, P. B. , 1987, Boiling, Condensation, and Gas–Liquid Flow, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.
Zivi, S. , 1964, “Estimation of Steady-State Steam Void-Fraction by Means of the Principle of Minimum Entropy Production,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 86(2), pp. 247–251. [CrossRef]
Ishii, M. , and Hibiki, T. , 2006, Thermo-Fluid Dynamics of Two-Phase Flow, Springer, New York.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

(a) Schematic diagram and (b) line diagram of an NCL with two parallel risers

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Temperature and quality variation along the length of the loop

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Two different configurations of parallel risers: (a) single channel and (b) parallel channel (cases 1 and 2)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Comparison between a single-riser NCL with a two-riser NCL for case 1. (a) Variation of total mass flux through the loop with heat input, (b) variation of riser exit vapor quality with heat input, and (c) variation of total mass flux through the loop with exit vapor quality.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Comparison between a single-riser NCL with a two-riser NCL for case 2. (a) Variation of total mass flux through the loop with heat input, (b) variation of riser exit vapor quality with heat input, and (c) variation of total mass flux through the loop with exit vapor quality.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Comparison of prediction by HEM with (a) HEM with slip and (b) DFM

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Effect of differential heating on the loop performance. (a) Variation of total mass flux through the loop, (b) variation of exit vapor quality of riser A, (c) variation of mass flux through riser A, (d) variation of frictional resistance in riser A, (e) variation of the ratio of mass flux through risers A and B, and (f) variation of single phase to two phase length in riser A.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Operating regime of the loop with differentially heated parallel risers

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In