0
Research Papers

Development of an Analytical Design Tool for Monolithic Emission Control Catalysts and Application to Nano-Textured Substrate System

[+] Author and Article Information
Chad A. Baker

Research and Advanced Engineering,
Ford Motor Company,
2151 Village Rd
Dearborn, MI 48124
e-mail: cbake134@ford.com

Alaattin Osman Emiroglu

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Abant Izzet Baysal University,
Bolu 14100, Turkey
e-mail: aosmanemiroglu@gmail.com

Rehan Mallick

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Texas at Austin,
204 E. Dean Keeton,
Austin, TX 78712
e-mail: rmallick6806@gmail.com

Ofodike A. Ezekoye

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Texas at Austin,
204 E. Dean Keeton,
Austin, TX 78712
e-mail: dezekoye@mail.utexas.edu

Li Shi

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Texas at Austin,
204 E. Dean Keeton,
Austin, TX 78712
e-mail: lishi@mail.utexas.edu

Matthew J. Hall

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Texas at Austin,
204 E. Dean Keeton,
Austin, TX 78712
e-mail: mjhall@mail.utexas.edu

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Heat Transfer Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF THERMAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS. Manuscript received December 5, 2012; final manuscript received February 14, 2014; published online April 11, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Ranganathan Kumar.

J. Thermal Sci. Eng. Appl 6(3), 031014 (Apr 11, 2014) (11 pages) Paper No: TSEA-12-1217; doi: 10.1115/1.4026944 History: Received December 05, 2012; Revised February 14, 2014

An analytical transport/reaction model was developed to simulate the catalytic performance of ZnO nanowires as a catalyst support. ZnO nanowires were chosen because they have easily characterized, controllable features and a spatially uniform morphology. The analytical model couples convection in the catalyst flow channel with reaction and diffusion in the porous substrate material; it was developed to show that a simple analytical model with physics-based mass transport and empirical kinetics can be used to capture the essential physics involved in catalytic conversion of hydrocarbons. The model was effective at predicting species conversion efficiency over a range of temperature and flow rate. The model clarifies the relationship between advection, bulk diffusion, pore diffusion, and kinetics. The model was used to optimize the geometry of the experimental catalyst for which it predicted that maximum species conversion density for fixed catalyst surface occurred at a channel height of 520 μm.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Laing, P. M., Shane, M. D., Son, S., Adamczyk, A. A., and Li, P., 1999, “A Simplified Approach to Modeling Exhaust System Emissions: SIMTWC,” Technical Report No. 1999-01-3476, SAE International, Warrendale, PA.
Koltsakis, G. C., Konstantinidis, P. A., and Stamatelos, A. M., 1997 “Development and Application Range of Mathematical Models for 3-Way Catalytic Converters,” Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 12(2-3), pp. 161–191. [CrossRef]
Lambert, C. K., Laing, P. M., and Hammerle, R. H., 2002, “Using Diesel After treatment Models to Guide System Design for Tier II Emission Standards,” Technical Report No. 2002-01-1868, SAE International, Warrendale, PA.
Heck, R. M., Farrauto, R. J., and Gulati, S. T., 2009, Catalytic Air Pollution Control: Commercial Technology, 3rd ed., Wiley, New York.
Katare, S., and Laing, P. M., 2006, “A Hybrid Framework for Modeling After Treatment Systems: A Diesel Oxidation Catalyst Application,” Technical Report No. 2006-01-0689, SAE International, Warrendale, PA.
Katare, S., Caruthers, J. M., Nicholas Delgass, W., and Venkatasubramanian, V., 2004, “An Intelligent System for Reaction Kinetic Modeling and Catalyst Design,” Indus. Eng. Chem. Res., 43(14), pp. 3484–3512. [CrossRef]
Bhattacharya, M., Harold, M. P., and Balakotaiah, V., 2004, “Shape Normalization for Catalytic Monoliths,” Chem. Eng. Sci., 59(18), pp. 3737–3766. [CrossRef]
Bhattacharya, M., Harold, M. P., and Balakotaiah, V., 2004, “Low-Dimensional Models for Homogeneous Stirred Tank Reactors,” Chem. Eng. Sci., 59(22-23), pp. 5587–5596. [CrossRef]
Joshi, S. Y., Harold, M. P., and Balakotaiah, V., 2009, “Low-Dimensional Models for Real Time Simulations of Catalytic Monoliths,” AIChE J., 55(7), pp. 1771–1783. [CrossRef]
Joshi, S. Y., Harold, M. P., and Balakotaiah, V., 2009, “On the Use of Internal Mass Transfer Coefficients in Modeling of Diffusion and Reaction in Catalytic Monoliths,” Chem. Eng. Sci., 64(23), pp. 4976–4991. [CrossRef]
Joshi, S. Y., Harold, M. P., and Balakotaiah, V., 2010, “Overall Mass Transfer Coefficients and Controlling Regimes in Catalytic Monoliths,” Chem. Eng. Sci., 65(5), pp. 1729–1747. [CrossRef]
Yang, P., Yan, H., Mao, S., Russo, R., Johnson, J., Saykally, R., Morris, N., Pham, J., He, R., and Choi, H. J., 2002, “Controlled Growth of ZnO Nanowires and Their Optical Properties,” Adv. Funct. Mater., 12(5), pp. 323–331. [CrossRef]
Greene, L. E., Law, M., Goldberger, J., Kim, F., Johnson, J. C., Zhang, Y., Saykally, R. J., and Yang, P., 2003, “Low-Temperature Wafer-Scale Production of ZnO Nanowire Arrays,” Angew. Chem. Int., Ed., 42(26), pp. 3031–3034. [CrossRef]
Greene, L. E., Law, M., Tan, D. H., Montano, M., Goldberger, J., Somorjai, G., and Yang, P., 2005, “General Route to Vertical ZnO Nanowire Arrays Using Textured ZnO Seeds,” Nano Lett., 5(7), pp. 1231–1236. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Greene, L. E., Yuhas, B. D., Law, M., Zitoun, D., and Yang, P., 2006, “Solution-Grown Zinc Oxide Nanowires,” Inorg. Chem., 45(19), pp. 7535–7543. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Wang, X., Song, J., and Wang, Z. L., 2007, “Nanowire and Nanobelt Arrays of Zinc Oxide From Synthesis to Properties and to Novel Devices,” J. Mater. Chem., 17(8), pp. 711–720. [CrossRef]
Wu, Y., Yan, H., Huang, M., Messer, B., Song, J. H., and Yang, P., 2002, “Inorganic Semiconductor Nanowires: Rational Growth, Assembly, and Novel Properties,” Chem. A Eur. J., 8(6), pp. 1260–1268. [CrossRef]
Guo, X.-N., Shang, R.-J., Wang, D.-H., Jin, G.-Q., Guo, X.-Y., and Tu, K. N., 2009, “Avoiding Loss of Catalytic Activity of Pd Nanoparticles Partially Embedded in Nanoditches in SiC Nanowires,” Nanoscale Res. Lett., 5(2), pp. 332–337. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Wang, G., Johannessen, E., Kleijn, C. R., de Leeuw, S. W., and Coppens, M. O., 2007, “Optimizing Transport in Nanostructured Catalysts: A Computational Study,” Chem. Eng. Sci., 62(18-20), pp. 5110–5116. [CrossRef]
Malek, K., and Coppens, M.-O., 2003, “Knudsen Self- and Fickian Diffusion in Rough Nanoporous Media,” J. Chem. Phys., 119(5), pp. 2801–2811. [CrossRef]
Coppens, M.-O., 2001, “Characterization of Fractal Surface Roughness and Its Influence on Diffusion and Reaction,” Colloids Surf. A, 187-188, pp. 257–265. [CrossRef]
Coppens, M. O., 1999, “The Effect of Fractal Surface Roughness on Diffusion and Reaction in Porous Catalysts-From Fundamentals to Practical Applications,” Catal. Today, 53(2), pp. 225–243. [CrossRef]
Naumann d'Alnoncourt, R., Xia, X., Strunk, J., Löffler, E., Hinrichsen, O., and Muhler, M., 2006, “The Influence of Strongly Reducing Conditions on Strong Metal–Support Interactions in Cu/ZnO Catalysts Used for Methanol Synthesis,” Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 8(13), pp. 1525–1538. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Aryafar, M., and Zaera, F., 1997, “Kinetic Study of the Catalytic Oxidation of Alkanes Over Nickel, Palladium, and Platinum Foils,” Catal. Lett., 48(3), pp. 173–183. [CrossRef]
Kolmakov, A. A., and Goodman, D. W., 2003, “Size Effects in Catalysis by Supported Metal Clusters,” Quantum Phenomena in Clusters and Nanostructures, S.Khanna and W.Castleman, eds., Springer, Berlin, pp. 159–197.
Pisani, L., 2008, “Multi-Component Gas Mixture Diffusion Through Porous Media: A 1D Analytical Solution,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 51(3-4), pp. 650–660. [CrossRef]
Morbidelli, M., Gavriilidis, A., and Varma, A., 2001, Catalyst Design: Optimal Distribution of Catalyst in Pellets, Reactors, and Membranes, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Gao, F., McClure, S. M., Cai, Y., Gath, K. K., Wang, Y., Chen, M. S., Guo, Q. L., and Goodman, D. W., 2009, “CO Oxidation Trends on Pt-Group Metals From Ultrahigh Vacuum to Near Atmospheric Pressures: A Combined in Situ PM-IRAS and Reaction Kinetics Study,” Surf. Sci., 603(1), pp. 65–70. [CrossRef]
Bejan, A., 2003, “Optimal Internal Structure of Volumes Cooled by Single-Phase Forced and Natural Convection,” ASME J. Electron. Packaging, 125(2), pp. 200–207. [CrossRef]
da Silva, A. K., Lorente, S., and Bejan, A., 2006, “Constructal Multi-Scale Structures for Maximal Heat Transfer Density,” Energy, 31(5), pp. 620–635. [CrossRef]
da SilvaA. K., and Bejan, A., 2005, “Constructal Multi-Scale Structure for Maximal Heat Transfer Density in Natural Convection,” Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 26(1), pp. 34–44. [CrossRef]
da Silva, A. K., Bejan, A., and Lorente, S., 2004, “Maximal Heat Transfer Density in Vertical Morphing Channels With Natural Convection,” Numerical Heat Transf., Part A: Appl., 45(2), pp. 135–152. [CrossRef]
MillsA. F., 1998, Heat Transfer, 2 ed., Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Byron Bird, R., Stewart, W. E., and Lightfoot, E. N., 2001, Transport Phenomena, 2nd ed., Wiley, New York.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic of catalyst test rig

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Schematic of alumina sample holder

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

SEM image of nanowires grown on Si wafer. Scale bar is 1 μm.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

TEM image of nanowire after being sputter coated with 1 nm Pt/Pd. Scale bar is 10 nm.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Plot of conversion efficiency versus Pt/Pd loading on nanowires at 450 °C and 500 sccm.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

SEM images showing how Pt/Pd agglomeration is affected by sputter thickness. Scale bars are 100 nm.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Plot of conversion efficiency versus temperature for three flow rates for Si wafers coated with nanowires with 10 nm Pt/Pd sputter deposition thickness.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Schematic of catalyst model with coordinate system defined. Not to scale.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Nondimensional parameters and corresponding rate-limiting mechanisms

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Plot of hydrocarbon conversion efficiency versus temperature comparing performance of catalyst with control experiment

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Parameterized plot showing hydrocarbon conversion efficiency as a function of temperature for various flow rates for experimental and modeling results. Values of Da, Peh, and ϕ for select temperatures are shown in Table 3.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Plot of conversion efficiency per unit volume versus channel height. Channel height is the vertical distance between adjacent catalyst plates. The baseline flow velocity was 16.7 cm/s and the temperature was 400 °C.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Contour plots showing species concentration profile as a function of x˜ and y˜ for one-term and four-term Fourier series solutions as well as the numerical solution for a fully developed parabolic flow. V·=500sccm and T = 400 °C.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Plot showing predicted conversion efficiency for the numerical model that accounts for fully developed parabolic flow and the analytical model using 1 to 10 terms. V·=500sccm.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In