Research Papers

Computational Investigation of Air-Heater Performance Using Natural Gas, Biogas, and Syngas as Fuels

[+] Author and Article Information
Gerardo Diaz

School of Engineering,
University of California,
5200 North Lake Road,
Merced, CA 95343
e-mail: gdiaz@ucmerced.edu

Contributed by the Heat Transfer Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF THERMAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS. Manuscript received May 27, 2013; final manuscript received February 3, 2014; published online March 21, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Alexander L. Brown.

J. Thermal Sci. Eng. Appl 6(3), 031011 (Mar 21, 2014) (6 pages) Paper No: TSEA-13-1093; doi: 10.1115/1.4026813 History: Received May 27, 2013; Revised February 03, 2014; Accepted February 04, 2014

Alternative fuels, mainly generated from waste, constitute a possible option to reduce the demand for fossil fuels. For instance, biogas can be obtained from cow manure using anaerobic digesters, a technology that is currently being implemented in several dairy farms. Synthesis gas, also known as syngas, is a mixture of hydrogen and carbon monoxide that may have fractions of other components such as nitrogen, carbon dioxide, and methane, depending on the gasifying method used. However, before a change to alternative fuels can be made, the performance of common appliances and industrial equipment using these fuels needs to be investigated. In this paper, a computational analysis of the performance of an air heater using natural gas, biogas, and syngas is performed. The results show that alternative fuels with heat values almost an order of magnitude lower than natural gas can be used in commercial air heaters with only minor variations in thermal performance. The main drawback is the higher flow rates required for alternative fuels, specially for syngas.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Glassman, I., and Yetter, R. A., 2008, Combustion, 4th ed., Academic, Press, New York.
Frenklach, M., Wang, H., and Rabinowitz, J. M., 1992, “Optimization and Analysis of Large Chemical Kinetic Mechanisms Using the Solution Mapping Method Combustion of Methane,” Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 18, pp. 47–73. [CrossRef]
Hunter, T. B., Wang, H., Litzinger, T. A., and Frenklach, M., 1994, “The Oxidation of Methane at Elevated Pressures: Experiments and Modeling,” Combust. Flame, 97, pp. 201–224. [CrossRef]
Li, S. C., and Williams, F. A., 1999, “NOx Formation in Two-Stage Methane-Air Flames,” Combust. Flame, 118(3), pp. 399–414. [CrossRef]
Loffler, G., Sieber, R., Harasek, M., Hofbauer, H., Hauss, R., and Landauf, J., 2006, “NOx Formation in Natural Gas Combustion—A New Simplified Reaction Scheme for CFD Calculations,” Fuel, 85, pp. 513–523. [CrossRef]
Guo, H., Liu, F., and Smallwood, G. J., 2005, “A Numerical Study on NOx Formation in Laminar Counterflow CH4/Air Triple Flames,” Combust. Flame, 143, pp. 282–298. [CrossRef]
Saqr, K. M., Aly, H. S., Sies, M. M., and Wahid, M. A., 2010, “Effect of Free Stream Turbulence on NOx and Soot Formation in Turbulent Diffusion CH4-Air Flames,” Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transfer, 37, pp. 611–617. [CrossRef]
Liu, W., Xu, Y., Tian, Z., and Xu, Z., 2003, “A Thermodynamic Analysis on the Catalytic Combustion of Methane,” J. Nat. Gas Chem., 12, pp. 237–242.
Hinton, N., and Stone, R., 2014, “Laminar Burning Velocity Measurements of Methane and Carbon Dioxide Mixtures (Biogas) Over Wide Ranging Temperatures and Pressures,” Fuel, 116, pp. 743–750. [CrossRef]
Jahangirian, S., Engeda, A., and Wichman, I. S., 2009, “Thermal and Chemical Structure of Biogas Counterflow Diffusion Flames,” Energy Fuels, 23, pp. 5312–5321. [CrossRef]
Moliere, M., 2002, “Benefiting From the Wide Fuel Capability of Gas Turbines: A Review of Application Opportunities,” Proceedings ASME Turbo Expo 2002: Power for Land, Sea, and Air, Vol. 1, pp. 227–238.
Frassoldati, A., Faravelli, T., and Ranzi, E., 2007, “The Ignition, Combustion, and Flame Structure of Carbon Monoxide/Hydrogen Mixtures. Note 1: Detailed Kinetic Modeling of Syngas Combustion Also in Presence of Nitrogen Compounds,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 32, pp. 3471–3485. [CrossRef]
Cuoci, A., Frassoldati, A., Buzzi-Ferraris, G., Faravelli, T., and Ranzi, E., 2007, “The Ignition, Combustion, and Flame Structure of Carbon Monoxide/Hydrogen Mixtures. Note 2: Fluid Dynamics and Kinetic Aspects of Syngas Combustion,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 32, pp. 3486–3500. [CrossRef]
Walton, S. M., He, X., Zigler, B. T., and Wooldridge, M. S., 2007, “An Experimental Investigation of the Ignition Properties of Hydrogen and Carbon Monoxide Mixtures for Syngas Turbine Applications,” Proc. Combust. Inst., 31, pp. 3147–3154. [CrossRef]
EIA, 2011, U.S. Energy Information Administration, Annual Energy Outlook 2011, Doe/eia-0383(2011), EIA Office of Integrated and International Energy Analysis, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC. www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo/
EPA, 2007, “U.S. Greenhouse Gas Inventory Archive,” US Environmental Protection Agency, Technical Report No. EPA 430-R-07-002.
Crookes, R. J., 2006, “Comparative Bio-Fuel Performance in Internal Combustion Engines,” Biomass Bioenergy, 30, pp. 461–468. [CrossRef]
Newman, L. L., and McGee, J. P., 1956, “Oxygen Gasification of Coal: Some Unsolved Processing Problems,” Ind. Eng. Chem., 48(7), pp. 2223–2227. [CrossRef]
Basu, P., and Mettanant, V., 2009, “Biomass Gasification in Supercritical Water a Review,” Int. J. Chem. React. Eng., 7, pp. 1–61.
Reed, T. B., Levie, B., Markson, M. L., and Graboski, M. S., 1983, “A Mathematical Model for Stratified Downdraft Gasifiers,” Symposium on Mathematical Modeling of Biomass Pyrolysis Phenomena, Fuel Chemical Division, American Chemical Society, Vol. 28(5), pp. 410–420.
Roy, P. C., Datta, A., and Chakraborty, N., 2009, “Modelling of a Downdraft Biomass Gasifier With Finite Rate Kinetics in the Reduction Zone,” Int. J. Energy Res., 33, pp. 833–851. [CrossRef]
Emmerson, V. M., and Diaz, G., 2010, “Experimental Characterization of a Small-Scale Downdraft Gasifier for Biomass Waste,” Proceedings ASME IMECE 2010, IMECE2010-37392, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, pp. 1–5.
Ramos, J. I., 1986, “Comparison Between Thermodynamic and One-Dimensional Combustion Models of Spark-Ignition Engines,” Appl. Math. Modell., 10, pp. 409–422. [CrossRef]
Wilcox, D., 1998, Turbulence Modeling for CFD, DCW Industries Inc., La Canada, CA.
Warschauer, K. A., and Leene, J. A., 1971, “Experiments on Mean and Fluctuating Pressures of Circular Cylinders at Cross Flow at Very High Reynolds Numbers,” Proceedings International Conference on Wind Effects on Buildings and Structures, pp. 305–315.
Zdravkovich, M. M., 1997, Flow Around Circular Cylinders. Fundamentals, Vol. 1, Oxford University, Oxford, UK, Chap. VI.
Catalano, P., Wang, M., Iaccarino, G., and Moin, P., 2003, “Numerical Simulation of the Flow Around a Circular Cylinder at High Reynolds Numbers,” Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 24, pp. 463–469. [CrossRef]
Churchill, S. W., and BernsteinM. A., 1977, “A Correlating Equation for Forced Convection From Gases and Liquids to a Circular Cylinder in Crossflow,” J. Heat Transfer, 99(2), pp. 300–306. [CrossRef]
Zeldovich, Y. B., 1946, “Oxidation of Nitrogen in Combustion and Explosions,” Acta Physicochim. URSS, 21, pp. 577–625.
Kee, R. J., Coltrin, M. E., and Glarborg, P., 2003, Chemically Reacting Flow, Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken, NJ.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Air heater geometry

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

External air temperature profiles at three different sections inside the air heater (fuel: natural gas)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Exhaust gases temperature profiles inside the tube of the air heater (fuel: natural gas)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Computational model of the air heater

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

External air velocity profiles at three different sections inside the air heater (fuel: natural gas). Similar profiles were obtained for biogas and syngas fuels.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Exhaust gas velocity profiles at three different sections inside the air heater (fuel: natural gas). Similar profiles were obtained for biogas and syngas fuels.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Validation of the simulation of turbulent flow past a cylinder. Pressure coefficient (Cp) versus angle measured from stagnation point (Θ). — = present work at Re = 1 × 106, ◯ = experiment by Ref. [25] at Re = 1.2 × 106, ○=experiment by Falchsbart (in Ref. [26] at Re = 6.7 × 105, and X = LES by Ref. [27] at Re = 1 × 106.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Comparison of LHV versus m· and ΔTair versus m· for the three flow rates used for natural gas, biogas, and syngas, respectively




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In