0
Research Papers

Positive Flow Response Characteristic in Vertical Tube Furnace of Supercritical Once-Through Boiler

[+] Author and Article Information
Huan Wang

State Key Laboratory of Multiphase
Flow in Power Engineering,
School of Energy and Power Engineering,
Xi'ran Jiaotong University,
Xi'an, Shaanxi 710049, China

Defu Che

State Key Laboratory of Multiphase
Flow in Power Engineering,
School of Energy and Power Engineering,
Xi'an Jiaotong University,
Xi'an, Shaanxi 710049, China
e-mail: dfche@mail.xjtu.edu.cn

2BMCR: boiler maximum continuous rating.

3BRL: boiler rated load.

4THA: turbine heat acceptance.

1Corresponding author.

Manuscript received June 28, 2013; final manuscript received October 20, 2013; published online January 31, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Jovica R. Riznic.

J. Thermal Sci. Eng. Appl 6(3), 031002 (Jan 31, 2014) (13 pages) Paper No: TSEA-13-1104; doi: 10.1115/1.4025945 History: Received June 28, 2013; Revised October 20, 2013

Positive flow response characteristic in vertical tube furnace of supercritical once-through boiler provides a feasible and effective way to alleviate the thermal maldistribution to some extent. In the present paper, theoretical derivation and simulations were performed to investigate the mechanism and forming conditions of positive flow response characteristic systematically. Two types of transition criterions were built up to judge positive or negative flow response characteristic. Parametric study was carried out to analyze the influencing factors. Both the operating conditions (mass flux, pressure, temperature or quality, heat flux) and the geometric parameters (inside diameter, length, pitch and type of tube) were investigated. In addition, thermal-hydraulic simulation of a 600 MW supercritical W-flame boiler has been carried out to take all these factors into account simultaneously. The conclusions drawn from this study will be of help to the design of large capacity supercritical once-through boilers as well as the refurbishment of existing supercritical or subcritical boilers.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

McDonald, D. K., and Kim, S. S., 2001, “Vertical Tube, Variable Pressure Furnace For Supercritical Steam Boilers,” POWER-GEN International 2001, Babcock & Wilcox, Las Vegas, NV, pp. 1–7.
Lundqist, R., Schrief, A., Kinnunen, P., Myöhänen, K., and Seshamani, M., 2003, “A Major Step Forward—The Supercritical CFB Boiler,” PowerGen International 2003Las Vegas, NV, pp. 1–22.
Li, Y., Zhao, X. M., Yue, G. X., and Liu, Q., 2006, “Analysis of Working Principle and Application of Low Mass Flow-Speed Vertical Tube-Platen Technology,” J. Eng. Thermal Energy Power, 21(6), pp. 640–643, 647. [CrossRef]
Goidich, S. J., Garcia-Mallol, J. A., Seltzer, A. H., and Wagner, D. E., 2008, “Integration of the Arch Furnace and BENSON Vertical OTU Technologies for High Efficiency Low Volatile Fuel Combustion,” Power Gen International 2008, Pennwell, Orlando, FL, pp. 1–16.
Wang, F. W., 2003, “Application of Optimized Ribbed Tubing in the Design of Low mass flux once-through boiler,” Electric Power, 36(12), pp. 17–20. [CrossRef]
Fan, Q. G., 2006, “Characteristics Analysis for Ultra-Supercritical Boilers With Vertical Rifled Tube Platen Water Wall on Variable Pressure Operation,” Boiler Technol., 37(5), pp. 5–10. [CrossRef]
Zhu, X. J., Bi, Q. C., Su, Q. H., Yang, D., Wang, J. G., Wu, G., and Yu, S. Q., 2010, “Self-Compensating Characteristic of Steam-Water Mixture at Low Mass Velocity in Vertical Upward Parallel Internally Ribbed Tubes,” Appl. Therm. Eng., 30(16), pp. 2370–2377. [CrossRef]
Lalot, S., Florent, P., Lank, S. K., and Bergles, A. E., 1999, “Flow Maldistribution in Heat Exchangers,” Appl. Therm. Eng., 19(8), pp. 847–863. [CrossRef]
Minzer, U., Barnea, D., and Taitel, Y., 2006, “Flow Rate Distribution in Evaporating Parallel Pipes—Modeling And Experimental,” Chem. Eng. Sci., 61(22), pp. 7249–7259. [CrossRef]
Baikin, M., Taitel, Y., and Barnea, D., 2011, “Flow Rate Distribution in Parallel Heated Pipes,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 54(19–20), pp. 4448–4457. [CrossRef]
Kakac, S., and Bon, B., 2008, “A Review of Two-Phase Flow Dynamic Instabilities in Tube Boiling System,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 51(3–4), pp. 399–433. [CrossRef]
Kakaç, S., Veziroğlu, T. N., Padki, M. M., Fu, L. Q., and Chen, X. J., 1990, “Investigation of Thermal Instabilities in a Forced Convection Upward Boiling System,” Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci., 3(2), pp. 191–201. [CrossRef]
Ablanque, N., Oliet, C., Rigola, J., Perez-Segarra, C. D., and Oliva, A., 2010, “Two-Phase Flow Distribution in Multiple Parallel Tubes,” Int. J. Therm. Sci., 49(6), pp. 909–921. [CrossRef]
Pustylnik, L., Barnea, D., and Taitel, Y., 2006, “Prediction of Two-Phase Flow Distribution in Parallel Pipes Using Stability Analysis,” AIChE J., 52(10), pp. 3345–3352. [CrossRef]
Mueller, A. C., and Chiou, J. P., 1998, “Review of Various Types of Flow Maldistribution in Heat Exchangers,” Heat Transfer Eng., 9(2), pp. 36–50. [CrossRef]
Yamagata, K., Yoshida, S., Fujii, T., Hasegawa, S., and Nishikaw, K., 1972, “Forced Convective Heat-Transfer to Supercritical Water Flowing in tubes,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 15(12), pp. 2575–2593. [CrossRef]
Ozawa, M., Akagawa, K., and Sakaguchi, T., 1989, “Flow Instabilityies in Parallel-Channel Flow Systems of Gas-Liquid Two-Phase Mixtrues,” Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 15(4), pp. 639–657. [CrossRef]
Tong, L. S., and Tang, Y. S., 1997, Boiling Heat Transfer and Two-Phase Flow, Taylor & Francis, Washington, D.C.
Tang, R. H., Hu, Z. H., Chen, T. K., and Luo, Y. S., 2002, “An Analysis of the Water Wall Modification Scheme For a Chinese-Made Once-Through Boiler,” J. Eng. Thermal Energy Power, 17(6), pp. 641–643. [CrossRef]
Wu, J. G., 1996, “A New Design of Vertical Water Wall for BENSON-Boiler,” Dongfang Electr. Rev., 10(2), pp. 82–93.
Li, H., and Zhang, F., 2007, “Design Features and Production Practice of 2953 t/h Boiler in the Ultra-Supercritical Pressure Power Plant,” Electr. Equip., 8(5), pp. 6–10.
Huang, J. T., and Chen, T. K., 1999, “Analysis of Spiral Water-Wall Tube in Once-Through Boiler,” Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 33(11), pp. 51–54. [CrossRef]
Wang, W., Zhu, X., Bi, Q., Wu, G., and Huang, J., 2012, “Heat Sensitivity of Vertical Water Wall at Low Mass Velocity in Supercritical Pressure W-Shaped Flame Boiler,” Int. J. Therm. Sci., 53(0), pp. 202–208. [CrossRef]
Churchill, S. W., 1977, “Friction-Factor Equation Spans all Fluid-Flow Regimes,” Chem. Eng., 84(24), pp. 91–92.
Collier, J. G., and Thome, J. R., 1994, Convective Boiling and Condensation, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
Zhu, X. J., 2010, “Investigation on Two Parameters Measurement of High Pressure Steam-Water Two Phase Flow and Self-Compensating Characteristics of Vertical Water Wall at Low Mass Velocity in Supercritical Pressure CFB Boiler,” Ph.D. thesis, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Chisholm, D., 1973, “Pressure Gradients Due to Friction During the Flow of Evaporating Two-Phase Mixtures In Smooth Tubes and Channels,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 16(2), pp. 347–358. [CrossRef]
Chisholm, D., 1983, Two-Phase Flow in Pipelines and Heat Exchangers, George Godwin in Association With Institution of Chemical Engineers Press, London.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Once-through boiler furnace arrangements

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Positive versus negative flow response characteristic (a) positive flow response characteristic, and (b) negative flow response characteristic

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Schematic diagram of averaged condition tube and malfunctioning tube (a) averaged condition tube, and (b) malfunctioning tube

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Verification of the proposed judgment method for flow response characteristics (pin = 30 MPa, Tin = 325 °C, (ρw)0 = 1200 kg/(m2s), q = 130 kW/m2, d = 17.63 mm, l = 31.5 m, and s = 44.5 mm); (a) variation of pressure drop against heat absorption deviation at constant mass flux, (b) flow maldistribution due to thermal effect under constant pressure drop, and (c) variation of sensitivity coefficient with heat flux maldistribution coefficient

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Effect of mass flux on flow response characteristic (pin = 30 MPa, Tin = 325 °C, q = 130 kW/m2, d = 17.63 mm, l = 31.5 m, and s = 44.5 mm, (ρw)0 = 500, 800, 1200, 1600, 2000 kg/(m2s))

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Effect of pressure on flow response characteristic (Tin = 325 °C, (ρw)0 = 1600 kg/(m2s), q = 130 kW/m2, d = 17.63 mm, l = 31.5 m, s = 44.5 mm, and pin = 15, 20, 25, 30 MPa)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Effect of temperature on flow response characteristic (pin = 30 MPa, (ρw)0 = 1600 kg/(m2s), q = 130 kW/m2, d = 17.63 mm, l = 31.5 m, s = 44.5 mm, and Tin = 275, 295, 315, 335 °C)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Effect of heat flux on flow response characteristic (pin = 30 MPa, Tin = 325 °C, (ρw)0 = 1600 kg/(m2s), d = 17.63 mm, l = 31.5 m, s = 44.5 mm, and q = 50, 100, 150, 200, 250 kW/m2)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Effect of tube inside diameter on flow response characteristic (pin = 30 MPa, Tin = 325 °C, (ρw)0 = 1600 kg/(m2s), q = 130 kW/m2, l = 31.5 m, s = 44.5 mm, and d = 11, 15.24, 17.63, 22.8 mm)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Effect of tube length on flow response characteristic (pin = 30 MPa, Tin = 325 °C, (ρw)0 = 1600 kg/(m2s), q = 130 kW/m2, d = 17.63 mm, s = 44.5 mm, and l = 15.76, 23.76, 31.5, 42 m)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Effect of tube pitch on flow response characteristic (pin = 30 MPa, Tin = 325 °C, (ρw)0 = 1600 kg/(m2s), q = 130 kW/m2, d = 17.63 mm, l = 31.5 m, and s = 44.5, 50.8, 62.5, 76.2 mm)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Effect of tube type on flow response characteristic at supercritical pressure (pin = 30 MPa, Tin = 325 °C, (ρw)0 = 1600 kg/(m2s), q = 130 kW/m2, d = 17.63 mm, l = 31.5 m, and s = 44.5 mm)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Effect of tube type on flow response characteristic at subcritical pressure (pin = 12 MPa, Tin = 265 °C, (ρw)0 = 500 kg/(m2s), q = 80 kW/m2, d = 17.63 mm, l = 31.5 m, and s = 44.5 mm)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Flow response characteristics of the lower water wall tubes in a 600 MW supercritical once through boiler under full and partial load conditions

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In