0
Research Papers

Impact, Fire, and Fluid Spread Code Coupling for Complex Transportation Accident Environment Simulation

[+] Author and Article Information
Alexander L. Brown

 Sandia National Laboratories, P.O. Box 5800, Albuquerque, NM 87185-1135albrown@sandia.gov

Gregory J. Wagner

 Sandia National Laboratories, 7011 East Avenue, Livermore, CA 94551gjwagne@sandia.gov

Kurt E. Metzinger

 Sandia National Laboratories, P.O. Box 5800, Albuquerque, NM 87185-0372kemetzi@sandia.gov

J. Thermal Sci. Eng. Appl 4(2), 021004 (Apr 16, 2012) (10 pages) doi:10.1115/1.4005735 History: Received August 04, 2011; Revised November 03, 2011; Published April 16, 2012; Online April 16, 2012

Transportation accidents frequently involve liquids dispersing in the atmosphere. An example is that of aircraft impacts, which often result in spreading fuel and a subsequent fire. Predicting the resulting environment is of interest for design, safety, and forensic applications. This environment is challenging for many reasons, one among them being the disparate time and length scales that are necessary to resolve for an accurate physical representation of the problem. A recent computational method appropriate for this class of problems has been described for modeling the impact and subsequent liquid spread. Because the environment is difficult to instrument and costly to test, the existing validation data are of limited scope and quality. A comparatively well instrumented test involving a rocket propelled cylindrical tank of water was performed, the results of which are helpful to understand the adequacy of the modeling methods. Existing data include estimates of drop sizes at several locations, final liquid surface deposition mass integrated over surface area regions, and video evidence of liquid cloud spread distances. Comparisons are drawn between the experimental observations and the predicted results of the modeling methods to provide evidence regarding the accuracy of the methods, and to provide guidance on the application and use of these methods.

Copyright © 2012 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

The primary spray from the impact from Ref. [2] (used with permission from photographers). The water is dyed red for clarity.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

An illustration of the layout of the collection pans (not to scale) with the numbering scheme for this report

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

A visual representation of the initial geometry for case 7. The aluminum tank is colored light gray, the target and ground are darker gray

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Dimensionless kinetic energy in the three coordinate directions and summed for the Presto predictions with the low geometric fidelity

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Predicted Sauter mean diameters for all test cases

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Case 1 drop diameter prediction details

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

Case 7 drop diameter prediction details

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 11

Predicted parcel density at 2.5 s

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 12

Case 7 spread predictions

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 13

Particle mass as a function of time

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 14

Experimental (a) and case 7 predicted (b) liquid spread at similar times

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 15

A detailed comparison of the pan deposition data and predictions

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 16

A summary of the liquid deposition comparison

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 17

Total predicted and measured deposited mass

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 18

Predicted deposition density at 15 s for case 1 (top) through case 7 (bottom) plotted on a logarithmic scale with black contours separating regions of fixed order of magnitude

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

An illustration of typical computational time scales

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

The high fidelity aluminum geometry

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

The calculated void fraction for a given dimensionless separation distance for a regular hexahedral spaced system of uniform sphere voids

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In